Sask Economic Outlook

[bucket]

A public private ownership consortium is the only way to get it off the ground. This is the one time govt has a role. Beefed up rail access for oil grains potash, adjacent utility corridor back to sk for hydro, return hydrocarbons ROW to a built out deep water port with tanker loading improvements.

It's all we got better get after it.

True but I am still waiting for Al Gore's prediction of open water to come true....just a sarcastic remark....dont take offence...

[bucket]

Is this the same projections used as prior to the last 2 elections? Because nothing has come out of anything projected. I could say I m gonna grow a million bushels more of canola so what if no one wants it. Do they have a market 20 years ahead for the oil? Lmao
How about something concrete here and now today to deal with the ag mega disaster we’ll under way?
What does fat boy have over these guys no one else gets the inside track besides the ones that buy land around the empty bypasses?

Pictures and videos is my guess....

[15444]

I am not an advocate for nuclear but i won't rail against it either....fence sitting that debate....some have said one of the reasons of Lake Deifenbaker was a water source for power generation that included nuclear....

I don't think it makes sense to mine uranium and send it all over the world when it could be used here and put back where it came from...on fairly safe ground/rock....

***ushima only had one fault and that was it wasn't built on high enough land... They censored that...

The prairies seem like a safe place to build a plant from a ground stability and weather events...

And Canada is world renowned for nuclear power plants....are we not?

As long as you're willing to have the nuclear waste buried in your own backyard and not shipped off somewhere else, I am ok with it as well.

[bucket]

As long as you're willing to have the nuclear waste buried in your own backyard and not shipped off somewhere else, I am ok with it as well.

Dumb question....but couldn't it go back where it came from?

[jazz]

If we are staying in Canada and it looks like we are, then we are going to be partially landlocked by commie leftists. We will be lucky to get a corridor out of here. There wont be one to the west coast again, thats done. TMX will be last pipeline that way. Nothing thru Ont and Que for sure. So its US, Churchill or the odd chance of something off the NWT arctic coast.

Make our own energy cooridor across the center of easter BC, AB, SK and MB to hudson bay. Make the thing a km wide and get owned by the provincial govts outright so no land claims can come back.

[Horse]

With global climate change and the artic warming faster than the rest of the world are you ready to put your money on a railroad built on muskeg and permafrost, Lets see who is first to step up,all you climate change deniers should feel it a safe investment??

[jazz]

With global climate change and the artic warming faster than the rest of the world are you ready to put your money on a railroad built on muskeg and permafrost, Lets see who is first to step up,all you climate change deniers should feel it a safe investment??

Construction methods have improved since the 1800s. If they can build skysc****rs on slurry and sand they can put a track and pipeline through MB.

Alaska has a pipeline through the arctic and they are building a highway to Tuktyuktuk. Can be done.

And MB which is a have not province that finally turfed their socialists should be hungry for this opportunity.

And Churchill make more economic sense than EE, gateway or even TMX. Its all downhill, friendlier area and having commodities offshore in the middle of the country gives them an option to go east or west.

All it would take is some leadership and vision. Instead we have limp dick running the country.

[TASFarms]

With global climate change and the artic warming faster than the rest of the world are you ready to put your money on a railroad built on muskeg and permafrost, Lets see who is first to step up,all you climate change deniers should feel it a safe investment??

Obama was all in on climate change. Yet he spent $15 million on some ocean front property. Climate change is U.N. scam

[Horse]

Construction methods have improved since the 1800s. If they can build skysc****rs on slurry and sand they can put a track and pipeline through MB.

Alaska has a pipeline through the arctic and they are building a highway to Tuktyuktuk. Can be done.

And MB which is a have not province that finally turfed their socialists should be hungry for this opportunity.

And Churchill make more economic sense than EE, gateway or even TMX. Its all downhill, friendlier area and having commodities offshore in the middle of the country gives them an option to go east or west.

All it would take is some leadership and vision. Instead we have limp dick running the country.

Construction methods have indeed improved,but costs have increased substanchuly, Alaska is a mountian range so probably has a firm base ,could an industry like oil survive by only shipping oil 4 or5 mo of the year? What is the shipping season ??
All it would take is leadership and MONEY, as for limp dick I dont think so as he seems able to f--k things up quite well.

[malleefarmer]

Dumb question....but couldn't it go back where it came from?

That’s a very good question.

Guess from unprocessed to processed the radiation levels blow out hence can’t be returned to soil that’s my assumption