• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Scheer resigns

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #73
    Originally posted by blackpowder View Post
    Drinking water?? Surely you jest.
    Billions buying votes under the banner of public safety or stopping the climate is much more important.
    I am not referencing the Liberals, I don't know why you are.

    I am looking for the party not to become like evangelical Republicans which are terribly concerned about the fetus, but could give shit less once it is born.

    Comment


      #74
      Originally posted by jazz View Post
      A news conf with a couple graphic slides and I could turn half the population against abortion in an afternoon. It's accepted because people put the horror out of their minds.
      You can do that, which most center voters would view as antagonistic and then the Left can pull out the history card and some photos of Yvonne Jurewicz. And while they are at it, they can haul Deborah Grey's feelings on the matter back into the public light and show just how much those social Conservatives, particularly a social Conservative WOMAN, care about the health of women seeking abortions. Remember good old hypocritical **** Grey? The literal and figurative hog that wanted her spot in the trough in the end anyways.

      Oh yeah. Your gonna win the next election by a landslide...Brad Trost is definitely your man.

      Comment


        #75
        Originally posted by 15444 View Post
        Oh yeah. Your gonna win the next election by a landslide...Brad Trost is definitely your man.
        Only a matter of time before its dealt with. RvW will be back in front of the Supreme Court in the US within 5 yrs. It wont be ruled on that same way as it was back in the 70s and that's got nothing to do with social conservatives.

        Rights will be conferred to a fetus at 26 weeks or so because its been shown to be able to survive outside the womb.

        The resetting of this will be a realigning of our moral code and match the mantra that a how a society treats its most vulnerable. I would consider the unborn the most vulnerable group of all.

        If smoke, booze, guns and drugs can be regulated then so can state backed infanticide.

        Comment


          #76
          Originally posted by jazz View Post
          Only a matter of time before its dealt with. RvW will be back in front of the Supreme Court in the US within 5 yrs. It wont be ruled on that same way as it was back in the 70s and that's got nothing to do with social conservatives.

          Rights will be conferred to a fetus at 26 weeks or so because its been shown to be able to survive outside the womb.

          The resetting of this will be a realigning of our moral code and match the mantra that a how a society treats its most vulnerable. I would consider the unborn the most vulnerable group of all.

          If smoke, booze, guns and drugs can be regulated then so can state backed infanticide.

          Completely different countries in terms of social policies. And Quebec, Toronto and Vancouver are not the Prairies in terms of social views. And you may have to fact check this, but I am pretty sure that is where the votes are.

          But hey official opposition for eternity is something right? Unless of course the party alienates all the Red Tories in the party and gets bumped to 3rd party status.

          Comment


            #77
            The west needs to leave this dominion. And have our own republic. We are too diametrically different. There is no one conservative enough for the west, and today’s liberal, ahem, Conservative party is scary and too right for the big cities, especially out east.

            And we are supposed to function as a country? My mom is 75. She is pure Canadian. She is ready for the west to be its own country already...

            Comment


              #78
              Originally posted by jazz View Post
              Nobody I know is against same sex marriage. So long as its between 2 consenting adults, marry who you want. Lots of us are married to the farm already. Who cares.
              This part of your post has been bugging me for a few days now.

              Simply because almost everyone I know around here IS against same sex marriage, and always will be. I ain’t talking just my church mates. I’m talking almost everyone I know.

              Just saying my truth, I mean no ill will. It is not nearly as accepted as the leftists would have us believe.

              Comment


                #79
                Originally posted by Sheepwheat View Post
                This part of your post has been bugging me for a few days now.

                Simply because almost everyone I know around here IS against same sex marriage, and always will be. I ain’t talking just my church mates. I’m talking almost everyone I know.

                Just saying my truth, I mean no ill will. It is not nearly as accepted as the leftists would have us believe.
                Ya, sorry but maybe you need to get out abit more. Get a wider circle. That is so 1980's. Anyone around here doesn't even discuss it as it is a non issue.

                Comment


                  #80
                  Originally posted by LEP View Post
                  Ya, sorry but maybe you need to get out abit more. Get a wider circle. That is so 1980's. Anyone around here doesn't even discuss it as it is a non issue.
                  I have a stance, I have principles. My circle is wide, and my circle is diverse. Everyone has theirs. No reason to take a dig is there? It’s not like I don’t know there is a law, that it is not going to change. But I will stand forever that marriage is for one man, and one woman, and won’t apologize for that. I do think we all have our own stance. But to belittle a huge part of the population that shares my stance is rich.

                  Carry on, I’m all good my friend. I am just fine not having a typical view, and have no shame for having that view. The world keeps turning and life goes on.

                  The reason it was bugging me is that I just felt I had to share what I think, and that if I didn’t, it would continue to bother me a bit...

                  Comment


                    #81
                    Hard to comprehend why the so called followers of the 2000 year old good book have such a big issue with same sex marriage. Of what concern is it of their's if a same sex couple in Montreal want to get married.

                    Isn't there a verse in the BIBLE stating "Judge Not lest Ye Be Judged" ?

                    Can only imagine what the teachings are in the home schooling.

                    Comment


                      #82
                      Originally posted by foragefarmer View Post
                      Hard to comprehend why the so called followers of the 2000 year old good book have such a big issue with same sex marriage. Of what concern is it of their's if a same sex couple in Montreal want to get married.

                      Isn't there a verse in the BIBLE stating "Judge Not lest Ye Be Judged" ?

                      Can only imagine what the teachings are in the home schooling.
                      Who is preaching at whom here? Wow.

                      Comment


                        #83
                        Originally posted by Sheepwheat View Post
                        This part of your post has been bugging me for a few days now.

                        Simply because almost everyone I know around here IS against same sex marriage, and always will be. I ain’t talking just my church mates. I’m talking almost everyone I know.

                        Just saying my truth, I mean no ill will. It is not nearly as accepted as the leftists would have us believe.
                        Your not going to be happy with the next conservative leaders stance on this subject.Guess the conservatives are about to get a lefty for a leader under your definition.

                        Comment


                          #84
                          Originally posted by newguy View Post
                          Your not going to be happy with the next conservative leaders stance on this subject.Guess the conservatives are about to get a lefty for a leader under your definition.
                          You’re correct 100%.

                          Comment

                          • Reply to this Thread
                          • Return to Topic List
                          Working...