Scheer resigns

[fjlip]

"married". I will NEVER be agreeable to "those people" using married. Find a new one, that one is taken by heterosexuals. Ya, the law, does not mean it is right. Women have only been persons less than 100 years.

[dmlfarmer]

"married". I will NEVER be agreeable to "those people" using married. Find a new one, that one is taken by heterosexuals. Ya, the law, does not mean it is right. Women have only been persons less than 100 years.

So fjlip, you are still upset that woman are now considered persons? Well that explains many of your posts!

[Sheepwheat]

So fjlip, you are still upset that woman are now considered persons? Well that explains many of your posts!

People like you need serious help with common sense and comprehension. If you ever read fij’s posts, you would see how he and his wife farm together.

You would have a clue.

[Guest]

So fjlip, you are still upset that woman are now considered persons? Well that explains many of your posts!

astounding ! and completely uncalled for! hope i am not putting words in your mouth FJ , but this deserves a reply
what any normal person would take home from FJ's comment is that under the law at the time ,women were not considered persons, this did not make it right
or are you saying that because it was the law at the time , that made it right ?
you need to read these posts more before making wild accusations to people that don't agree with you
this is not the first time you have made wild accusations like this

[Guest]

and DML, i asked you two honest questions that i am interested in hearing you honest answers? why won't you answer?
i will refresh for you;
1) Dml serious question if you could choose between trump and turdo , who would you pick ?
Neither is not an option on this question , that is the easy one we would all pick
2) And next question dml, who would you pick if the russians or chinese were coming ?

[dmlfarmer]

and DML, i asked you two honest questions that i am interested in hearing you honest answers? why won't you answer?
i will refresh for you;
1) Dml serious question if you could choose between trump and turdo , who would you pick ?
Neither is not an option on this question , that is the easy one we would all pick
2) And next question dml, who would you pick if the russians or chinese were coming ?

I have not answered because they are ridiculous questions equivalent to me asking you "when are you going to stop beating your wife (and saying you don't beat her is not an option)" The intent of the question is not honest, but to elicit a response.

I do not think you beat your wife, even though to every reader of the question it sounds like you must if I am asking you when you are going to quit.

I am not able to vote for either Trump (only US citizens can choose him) or Trudeau (only citizens of Papineau riding can) so to insinuate I or anyone else has ome kind of choice between the two an no one else is ridiculous.

The population of countries, resources, military are not the product of either person either so to credit one over the other because of military might is also misleading. More valid would ask between Trump and Putin or Trump and Chi. Or to make the question much more valid, between 2 US presidents like Trump and JFK or Eisenhower thereby removing the variables of different countries. Do the same for Trudeau and Chretien or Trudeau and Kim Campbell.

Both leaders are deeply flawed IMHO yet you demand I choose one or the other. BS, I can dislike both and you cannot tell me I can't!

I will tell you for damn sure that I would not hire either of them on my farm if they both applied for a job because of character flaws and a lack of work ethic demonstrated by their current employment. And that is my answer.

[fjlip]

Thanks guys, I actually thought about adding "Women have only been persons less than 100 years, it was THE LAW, was it right?" I seem to assume a reader's understanding even of some of my texts, that turn out ambiguous. I should have "but some people" will twist any words to their mind set.

[Guest]

Ok DML fair enough
It was an honest question though even though i admit , it is only hypothetical
Interesting analogy

[Guest]

Thanks guys, I actually thought about adding "Women have only been persons less than 100 years, it was THE LAW, was it right?" I seem to assume a reader's understanding even of some of my texts, that turn out ambiguous. I should have "but some people" will twist any words to their mind set.

Well i think 99.9% of readers caught your drift, if i did

[seldomseen]

I was just checking out Twitter and Rona is getting roasted for being more Liberal than Conservative. Then there was a tweet from the CBC beauty Chantel saying she is not even close to being fluent in French.
Sounds like she a is getting a lot of attention.

[Guest]

Chretian wasnt fluent im english?

[seldomseen]

Chretian wasnt fluent im english?

I am not sure if that is a requirement?