Climate Crisis Rebuffed

[oldguy48]

I do recommend reading the article I posted above, regardless which side of the debate you may be on. It shows exactly the lengths the climate cabal will go to to destroy the reputation and career of anyone who isn't extreme enough. It explains a lot of the apparent cognitive dissonance.

Can not read it because it is behind a Èpaid subscriptionÈ service.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Can not read it because it is behind a Èpaid subscriptionÈ service.

Try this, starting on page 8 is the WSJ article, but the whole testimony is worth reading:
https://science.house.gov/imo/media/doc/Pielke%20Testimony_0.pdf https://science.house.gov/imo/media/doc/Pielke%20Testimony_0.pdf

This is strange though. I read it this afternoon on the WSJ site, with no paywall, in its entirety. Come back to copy and paste, and it is paywalled, went to every other link that had the same article, and every one is only partial, and links to the same paywalled WSJ article. Had to find his testimony to finally read it. Perhaps Chuck reported that we were reading inconvenient facts...

[burnt]

An interesting clip from the "National Geographic".



"A cache of fosslized feathers found in Australia provides solid evidence that small carnivorous dinosaurs, like the one illustrated here, sported insulating plumage to help them survive life within the southern polar circle.
Illustration by Peter Trusler
Science
In a first, fossil dinosaur feathers found near the South Pole
The ancient plumage hints at how small carnivorous dinosaurs weathered long, cold winters inside the Antarctic Circle 118 million years ago.
4 Minute Read








By John Pickrell
________________________________________
PUBLISHED November 18, 2019
Ten exquisitely preserved fossil feathers found in Australia represent the first solid evidence that feathered dinosaurs lived at Earth’s poles, paleontologists report in an upcoming study in the journal Gondwana Research.
The feathers date back 118 million years to the early Cretaceous period, when Australia was much farther south and joined with Antarctica to form Earth’s southern polar landmass. Although the environment would have been warmer than Antarctica today, the dinosaurs that sported this plumage probably endured many months of darkness and potentially freezing temperatures during winter. (By the late Cretaceous, Antarctica was warm enough for South American sauropods to trek across the south polar region and into Australia.)
“Fossils feathers have never been found in polar settings before,” says study coauthor Benjamin Kear, a paleontologist at Uppsala University in Sweden. “Our discovery … shows for the first time that a diverse array of feathered dinosaurs and flight-capable primitive birds inhabited the ancient polar regions.”
..."

If interested, you can read the whole thing on the NG website.

[fjlip]

Perhaps Chuck reported that we were reading inconvenient facts...

And MSM, bury all truth with FAKE twisted news.

[furrowtickler]

Try this, starting on page 8 is the WSJ article, but the whole testimony is worth reading:
https://science.house.gov/imo/media/doc/Pielke%20Testimony_0.pdf https://science.house.gov/imo/media/doc/Pielke%20Testimony_0.pdf

This is strange though. I read it this afternoon on the WSJ site, with no paywall, in its entirety. Come back to copy and paste, and it is paywalled, went to every other link that had the same article, and every one is only partial, and links to the same paywalled WSJ article. Had to find his testimony to finally read it. Perhaps Chuck reported that we were reading inconvenient facts...

This is exactly why I distrust the majority of the climate crisis b/s, as do many others .
The distortion of info is sickening to push an agenda.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Another inconvenient paper. David Keith is another ardent supporter of the AGW hypothesis, and the need to do something about CO2, even has his own company to capture CO2. This is no denier.

Yet he and a colleague wrote a paper showing that wind turbines cause more warming than they could potentially reduce.

Harvard professor of applied physics and public policy David Keith and his postdoctoral researcher, Lee Miller, recently found that heavy reliance on wind energy actually increases climate warming! ...
The study, published in the journal Joule, found that if wind power supplied all U.S. electricity demands, it would warm the surface of the continental United States by 0.24 degree C (0.43 Fahrenheit). That is far more than any reduction in warming achieved by totally decarbonizing the nation’s electricity sector (around 0.1 C or 0.2 F)) during the 21st century – assuming climate models are correct about the amount of warming that carbon dioxide emissions are allegedly causing...
...As the authors explain, the warming is produced because wind turbines generate electricity by extracting energy out of the air, slowing down wind and otherwise altering “the exchange of heat, moisture, and momentum between the surface and the atmosphere.”...

And, as expected, the rest of the alarmists are trying to discredit them for having math skills, and understanding physics. As Chuck shows us every day, those skills are not permitted in these debates. Only belief and consensus(formerly called bullying)

Link to the paper: Paywalled. https://www.cell.com/joule/fulltext/S2542-4351(18)30446-X?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com %2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS254243511830446X%3Fshowall%3D true https://www.cell.com/joule/fulltext/S2542-4351(18)30446-X?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com %2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS254243511830446X%3Fshowall%3D true

[sumdumguy]

Seems the Madrid Climate conference is running into rough times. Pitty!

[AlbertaFarmer5]

An interesting clip from the "National Geographic".

Yet another organization who thinks cognitive dissonance is a positive attribute. I've lost count of all the discrepancies in a single issue of NG on the issue of global warming. Such as an article about Doggerland ( the English channel before sea level rise inundated it), and warnings about unprecedented sea level rise now.

[burnt]

Seems the Madrid Climate conference is running into rough times. Pitty!

Not that they really care since they're just a bunch of climate Madridiots.

[jazz]

And now our woke feminist and socialists profs are trying to recuit a bunch of home grown Gretas right here. Going after kids should be off limits.

Turns out that Sauchyn guy isnt just some climate observer, he is chair of a socialist think tank at the university and he calmly targets Ag in the article.

The only way to deal with this group is to give them what they want. Starve and freeze them for just a few weeks.

https://outline.com/6CrtWs Looking to the future in Sask.'s unique environment

WTF this is parenting?

“My parents tell me that ‘we left you this huge mess and now you have to clean it up.’ And they say that at this point it’s unethical to have kids because of what (their) generation has done,” Sellinger said.
“And it really upsets me that I’m not going to be able to have kids and I’m not going to be able to give my parents grandchildren. And I want to maybe hopefully make it better, so I can live a long happy life with a family that I can support and love.”