Three Big Energy Wins In 2019 weather.com Did you know â…“ of global energy comes from

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Maybe there are some opportunities for hydro in Sask but Alameda is not one of them as the seasonal water flows are too small and irregular.

Yes, you are probably right, seasonal and irregular energy sources just aren't going to be viable against consistent reliable sources.
Kind of funny really. For how many years have we been trying to explain this simple concept to you , No suddenly you think it's your own idea.

[samhill]

I’m as far from technology and electric power as you can get https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potassium-ion_battery was used in vehicles 19teens. My neighbour had one in a vehicle and one day government guys showed up and confiscated it. Apparently was a powerful long lasting battery. Wikipedia says was developed in 2004? or something. Not true.
Go figure.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

The saying about a lie being half way around the world before the truth even gets its shoes on rings truer than ever.

So, these alarmists repeat ( with some added embellishments, and outright lies), an untrue, and highly suggestively written piece of propaganda. But leave it in the public domain, with no corrections, or acknowledgement of the mistake, or that their gullibility has been exploited. Just keep passing on the same lies and false information.

[Integrity_Farmer]

Perhaps you should learn to read before posting on Agriville. That is not what it says.



Power being electricity, not total of all energy. And capacity being nameplate capacity, whereas what is defined as a renewable( solar and wind), typically have actual output in the 20-30% range compared to nameplate capacity(edit, UK solar is down in the single digit range). And the vast majority of what they are including as renewables is hydroelectric(not considered renewable by most of the greens), wind and solar are still in the very low single digits. And even if we ignore all of that, it still is nowhere near 1/3 according to any of the recognized energy agencies.

But it sure sounds impressive when you twist a few words around like you did.

GLOBAL VIDEOS3 days ago

I posted this directly from Weather.com I do not make up their headlines you might want to argue with them
Here is the direct post from there site or do you want me to make up the headline for them

Three Big Energy Wins In 2019
weather.com
Did you know â…“ of global energy comes from renewable sources now?

[fjlip]

And because "infallible genius all knowing god" Leonardo says so?

F*ck the SOB crook, liar, billionaire cultist!

[AlbertaFarmer5]

GLOBAL VIDEOS3 days ago

I posted this directly from Weather.com I do not make up their headlines you might want to argue with them
Here is the direct post from there site or do you want me to make up the headline for them

Three Big Energy Wins In 2019
weather.com
Did you know â…“ of global energy comes from renewable sources now?

Perhaps you should consider fact checking your sources. And not spread misinformation before checking its validity. If you had read anything posted on this site in recent years, you would have been aware that the headline couldn't possibly be correct.

This clickbait type headline is so common in the climate alarmist media, that is has become mandatory to read the actual article, since they rarely say the same thing as the headlines.

[chuckChuck]

Yes, you are probably right, seasonal and irregular energy sources just aren't going to be viable against consistent reliable sources.
Kind of funny really. For how many years have we been trying to explain this simple concept to you , No suddenly you think it's your own idea.

Hydro decisions are based on water flows. This has nothing to do with intermittent supplies of solar and wind.

I have never said solar or wind were going to replace all other supplies of electricity. But according to the IEA and Bloomberg they will become significant sources of electricity. But you obviously know more than the IEA and Bloomberg global energy analysis teams!

But you continue to deny their viability even in the face of their current existence and further implemention across North America, around the world and here on the prairies.

Remember Saskpower 50% renewables by 2030? They are building significant wind capacity at the moment. Why would they do that if it doesn't work?

[jazz]

First rule, dont believe fact perpetrated by weathermen.

Renewable energy is roughly 10% of the entire energy mix in the world. That is sources from solar, wind, hydro and biofuels.

Burning wood and natural biomass should not be considered renewable. If you cut down a tree and burn it now, you have a carbon balance within the past few decades or so. Its is the exact same thing as burning plant life thats millions of years old and turned to coal or oil, just balancing carbon from a different timeline. One cannot be considered carbon neutral and the other not, they are the same thing.

[jazz]

Remember Saskpower 50% renewables by 2030? They are building significant wind capacity at the moment. Why would they do that if it doesn't work?

Just trying to duck an economy killing tax.

if they works so well why didn't skippy buy them? Climate change is a global threat so that means the feds need to find the solution.

He could have invested in carbon sequestration. Nope, wants to plant a billion more trees to add to our trillion trees.

Stop defending the indefensible. If its a climate emergency then why isn't the govt putting all infrastructure spending to solar and wind?

Nope its all about the carbon tax. Its the ultimate squeeze, keep raising it and keep tightening the screws while people have no alternatives.

[chuckChuck]

First rule, dont believe fact perpetrated by weathermen.

Renewable energy is roughly 10% of the entire energy mix in the world. That is sources from solar, wind, hydro and biofuels.

Burning wood and natural biomass should not be considered renewable. If you cut down a tree and burn it now, you have a carbon balance within the past few decades or so. Its is the exact same thing as burning plant life thats millions of years old and turned to coal or oil, just balancing carbon from a different timeline. One cannot be considered carbon neutral and the other not, they are the same thing.

Weathermen? You said the same about economists! You probably don't believe anybody with specialized training and expertise if their expertise or facts don't suit your political views.

Its the flat earth society at work.

[jazz]

Weathermen? You said the same about economists! You probably don't believe anybody with specialized training and expertise if their expertise or facts don't suit your political views.

Its the flat earth society at work.

Yup and still waiting for that super cold winter big snow forecast to come to fruition. Above average temps now predicted into the mid of January, but that will be climate change then wont it.

These guys have no clue no matter how many phds they add to their name.

As soon as they gave their dire winter forecast, I knew it would be exactly the opposite. Only in weather and climate studies can you be wrong 100% of the time and still get paid.

[chuckChuck]

Just trying to duck an economy killing tax.

if they works so well why didn't skippy buy them? Climate change is a global threat so that means the feds need to find the solution.

He could have invested in carbon sequestration. Nope, wants to plant a billion more trees to add to our trillion trees.

Stop defending the indefensible. If its a climate emergency then why isn't the govt putting all infrastructure spending to solar and wind?

Nope its all about the carbon tax. Its the ultimate squeeze, keep raising it and keep tightening the screws while people have no alternatives.

Wrong again Einstein. BC has had a carbon tax for a long time and their economy is strong.

Alberta and Saskatchewan both have a carbon tax on large emitters and a plan to reduce carbon emissions!

Provinces are responsible for their electricity grids not the federal government.

Brad Wall invested in CCS at Boundary with federal and provincial government support paid for by taxpayers. It was expensive way to capture carbon and didn't work as planned.

Trees capture carbon just like crops except they hold it for much longer than annual crops. Wood used in buildings can sequester carbon for many decades.

Preston Manning supports a carbon tax. He must be a climate radical! LMAO

[jazz]

And this is why you never believe a forecast or a climate study accompanied by a scaremongering headline.

https://www.theweathernetwork.com/ca/news/article/canadas-winter-forecast-update-2019-2020-winter-pattern-locks-in-for-january UPDATED: Most of Canada still on track for cold winter

[AlbertaFarmer5]

You are easily distracted Chuck. Much to my surprise, Integrity actually responded, yet you have nothing at all to say about the fake headline about the fake news, just deflecting about CO2 taxes and politicians boondoggles.

[chuckChuck]

So same question why didn't skippy buy up 500k acres of land in sask and plant trees, solar panels and windmills. Half a million acres dedicated to your wonderful ideas should have solved our problems right?

Its so entertaining when hypocrits double down.

He doesn't have to Sask Power is busy installing cleaner capacity and reducing emissions on its own.