• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Three Big Energy Wins In 2019 weather.com Did you know â…“ of global energy comes from

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #37
    You posted the Leader post article to make your point. Now you don't like Sask Powers projections for lower emissions based on more renewables? hahaha. You will never be satisfied!

    Comment


      #38
      Yes, you are right again, I will never be satisfied when you use future projections to attempt to disprove a present day trend or event.

      Comment


        #39
        Sask plan has 90% real measures, hydro, nukes, natural gas, carbon sequestration....and 10% virtue signalling (wind and solar)

        Comment


          #40
          Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
          [ATTACH]5393[/ATTACH]
          Most of that graph of future emissions is the maritime GDP and economy going to zero, future depression in Ontario and Quebec hiding economic development while sucking in equalization. NB relying on subsidized hydro. BC reliant on Chinese money.

          In fact the entire east is planning to be dependent on carbon tax and equalization from the west while they let their economies slide.

          Actually now I agree its a climate emergency. Its a race for the west to defend its economy before virtue signalling Marxists can suck it dry.

          Click image for larger version

Name:	gdp.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	54.5 KB
ID:	769243
          Last edited by jazz; Dec 23, 2019, 12:13.

          Comment


            #41
            Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
            Perhaps you should consider fact checking your sources. And not spread misinformation before checking its validity. If you had read anything posted on this site in recent years, you would have been aware that the headline couldn't possibly be correct.

            This clickbait type headline is so common in the climate alarmist media, that is has become mandatory to read the actual article, since they rarely say the same thing as the headlines.
            You said I changed the words.-- NICE PIVOT
            Are you the censor on this site and the arbitrator of all truth?
            Last edited by Integrity_Farmer; Dec 23, 2019, 12:44.

            Comment


              #42
              Originally posted by Integrity_Farmer View Post
              You said I changed the words.-- NICE PIVOT
              Are you the censor on this site and the arbitrator of all truth?
              Have you and climatechuck switched causes from the CWB to Climate Alarmism?
              We are witnessing this group cheering for more government control, taxes and intrusion into our lives.
              Last edited by Oliver88; Dec 23, 2019, 13:54.

              Comment


                #43
                "Are you the censor on this site and the arbitrator of all truth?"

                That would be "your people's" CBC...for all of Canada.

                Click image for larger version

Name:	026.JPG
Views:	2
Size:	89.7 KB
ID:	769244

                Comment


                  #44
                  Originally posted by Integrity_Farmer View Post
                  You said I changed the words.-- NICE PIVOT
                  Are you the censor on this site and the arbitrator of all truth?
                  I was wrong, I apologize for falsely accusing you. When I opened it the first time it went right to the video with no text, I tried it on my phone, and I saw the accompanying headline text after you pointed that out. And, to your credit, you actually came back and responded after I suggested you wouldn't.

                  Have you notified weather.com about their false and misleading headline yet, to save other people the embarrassment of sharing something obviously wrong?

                  Never quite certain if these type of journalistic gaffes are intentional clickbait, knowing that most people won't know any better, and likely won't read past the headline anyways, or just gross incompetence by supposed journalists who are so far out of their technical league that they really have no idea that they are wrong.

                  Merry Christmas.

                  Comment


                    #45
                    Look like the other two "wins" are equally dubious.

                    Regarding Norway, just out yesterday, this has the greens all up in arms:
                    https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/norway-puts-controversial-ex-justice-minister-in-charge-of-oil https://www.bloombergquint.com/business/norway-puts-controversial-ex-justice-minister-in-charge-of-oil

                    And is this the lawsuit in Ecuador they are referring to?:

                    https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Ecuadorian-Plaintiffs-Drop-95B-Lawsuit-Against-Chevron.html https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Ecuadorian-Plaintiffs-Drop-95B-Lawsuit-Against-Chevron.html

                    I suppose unconditionally dropping a frivolous lawsuit and being forced to pay court costs counts as a win, then who am I to argue.

                    Comment

                    • Reply to this Thread
                    • Return to Topic List
                    Working...