• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sea Ice

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by 4GFarms View Post
    Ask yourself those questions in the mirror Horse. When someone shows evidence against what you preach and yet you still can’t say anything productive but attack personal character. Gets sickening! Go put your head back in the sand!!
    Talk about getting sickening,and attacking character,thats all that is going on on the subject of climate change.
    What are you all so scared of ?? Cant anyone have an opinion,right or wrong, seems to me everyone is out to be the dragon slayer,,dont like taxes,ok,but there must be other things you dont agree with,
    Give it a rest .

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Horse View Post
      What are you all so scared of ?? Cant anyone have an opinion,right or wrong, seems to me everyone is out to be the dragon slayer,,dont like taxes,ok,but there must be other things you dont agree with,
      Give it a rest .
      What we don't like is social engineering fronted by flimsy science and hypocritical politicians and enforced with unrepresented taxation.

      Maybe grab a little book on Marxism this winter and have a read.

      Comment


        #13
        I have an opinion.....I am a denier....it seems odd that planting a billion trees like trudeau has proposed will sequester 3-4 million tonnes and yet the trees here and re-growing in forests are doing nothing????

        Plus the studies on carbon sequestering on farmland have been done by scientists and yet nothing can be implemented to pay for farmer's efforts...

        It took less than 4 years to start taking the money on our energy bills ...and yet to give farmers a credit will go on for decades....

        I am also a denier because as I get older and spend more time thinking about what has happened before the weather seems cyclical....

        1994 ..we have a picture of being in light shirts for a picture outside at Christmas no snow..we just enjoyed the day ....nice weather has happened before at christmas....I don't think we can call it climate change....

        My older relatives just remember them taking the time to enjoy the weather instead of wondering what causes it....

        Comment


          #14
          I must add something....instead of using climate change as a birth control excuse maybe they could start enjoying the weather and some time outdoors .....will get people enjoying a warm embrace after a good day and start having kids....

          Comment


            #15
            And in Other News Jazz the Scientist has Found Cigarette smoking is Actually GOOD for your health.
            Vaccination is highly overrated
            And the Earth is indeed FLAT. LOL

            Comment


              #16
              Good point Jazz, if it ever went to court. Assuming you could find an impartial Judge that would conduct a fair trial. It would come down to deciding if global warming was caused solely by the burning of fossil fuel or partially or not at all. It would be be a battle involving crowds of lawyers making millions. The jury would grow old and weary and tired of charts presented by chuck.

              And the most accurate evidence won't be available for another 800 years.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by mustardman View Post
                And in Other News Jazz the Scientist has Found Cigarette smoking is Actually GOOD for your health.
                Vaccination is highly overrated
                And the Earth is indeed FLAT. LOL
                Are any of those observations and outcomes based on computer models?

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by rumrocks View Post
                  Good point Jazz, if it ever went to court. Assuming you could find an impartial Judge that would conduct a fair trial. It would come down to deciding if global warming was caused solely by the burning of fossil fuel or partially or not at all. It would be be a battle involving crowds of lawyers making millions. The jury would grow old and weary and tired of charts presented by chuck.

                  And the most accurate evidence won't be available for another 800 years.
                  Actually, the alarmists seem to lose every time they try using the courts. Which could be why they have switched to using children and gullible internet trolls instead.
                  See, all of Micheal Mann's frivolous court cases, the Peter Ridd dismissal, All of the oil companies( such as Exxon knew). etc. Seems to be almost daily lately.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Thank you you to all who QUESTION and don't blindly "believe those people"

                    They need to prove, the rest of us ONLY need to question. NO proof, all temps, rainfall, snowfall, has happened before. And prior to the BILLIONS of people now on earth, and prior to using C02 emitting fuels. End of the silent majority's case. PROVE IT!

                    So called "scientist" speak is NOT proof, just an opinion based on skewed data. It's azz wipe.

                    And the media...can go to hell...

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	Image-1.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	97.5 KB
ID:	769264

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	026.JPG
Views:	2
Size:	89.7 KB
ID:	769265

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by fjlip View Post
                      Thank you you to all who QUESTION and don't blindly "believe those people"

                      They need to prove, the rest of us ONLY need to question. NO proof, all temps, rainfall, snowfall, has happened before. And prior to the BILLIONS of people now on earth, and prior to using C02 emitting fuels. End of the silent majority's case. PROVE IT!

                      So called "scientist" speak is NOT proof, just an opinion based on skewed data. It's azz wipe.

                      And the media...can go to hell...

                      [ATTACH]5428[/ATTACH]

                      [ATTACH]5429[/ATTACH]
                      All the headlines say a certain country is warming faster or twice as fast as the rest of the world, by using that logic, the temperature of the world would go to infinity . . . . . temperature up, credibility down.

                      The National Inquirer must be concerned with all the competition they now have.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...