Both charts are interesting.
But deaths from climate catastrophes are likely to be lower from the early 20th century as a result of rural populations moving to cities, economic development and better management and prevention of human disasters.
Chart 2 shows that post war the US may have invested more resources in fire fighting that likely reduced the acres burned.
It also shows a clear trend of increase in in acres burned from the 1970s to 2010 which fits with the impact of climate change.
Its hard to draw any conclusions from the charts without taking in the multitude of factors that may be involved.
But deaths from climate catastrophes are likely to be lower from the early 20th century as a result of rural populations moving to cities, economic development and better management and prevention of human disasters.
Chart 2 shows that post war the US may have invested more resources in fire fighting that likely reduced the acres burned.
It also shows a clear trend of increase in in acres burned from the 1970s to 2010 which fits with the impact of climate change.
Its hard to draw any conclusions from the charts without taking in the multitude of factors that may be involved.
Comment