Originally posted by chuckChuck
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Electricity in Alberta today
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostDecember and January are some the worst months for solar because of the suns angle and short days. But when the sun starts to move north the production goes up significantly on sunny days and snow free solar panels put out near their capacity for 4-5 hours per day in March. Cold panels are more efficient and the snow will reflect more energy onto the panels.
Long live King Natural Gas, King Coal and King Hydro!!! I’m going to turn up my gas fireplace and celebrate tonight my warm house.
Bye bye Suzuki and Greta....biggest jokes from the last decade.
Comment
-
Ontario is a good example of what not to do with renewables. I mean wind and solar. When I see sask power bringing in more wind power and solar I get a sick feeling. This is going to cost me more. Carbon capture is costing every sask power customer $100 a year for the foreseeable future. These wind mills are an 100% expense
Comment
-
When talking about solar, we need to think about that as a seasonal supplement for about 3 or 4 months of the year. Battery tech is never going to allow us to store from one season to another, so thats done. Niche technology for this latitude. Give some homeowners a grant and get the virtuous to throw some panels up on their roofs. I expect about a 5% of homeowners would do this. Maybe some businesses. You will still need back up, people are not going to stand for summer AC going down with brownouts.
When talking wind, we need to be talking about a intermittent resource that could possibly interact with temporary storage, however it would still need to be backed up.
The logistics of managing 5 or 6 different sources of power and heat would become overwhelming and just stress the grid leading to more brown and blackouts. Why would you start cycling on nat gas and other base units to allow a fleeting intermittent load onto the system. That's never going to happen and that would be irresponsible management of our energy grid.
Comment
-
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-climate-change-denmark-windpower/denmark-sources-record-47-of-power-from-wind-in-2019-idUSKBN1Z10KE https://www.reuters.com/article/us-climate-change-denmark-windpower/denmark-sources-record-47-of-power-from-wind-in-2019-idUSKBN1Z10KE
COPENHAGEN (Reuters) - Denmark sourced almost half its electricity consumption from wind power last year, a new record boosted by steep cost reductions and improved offshore technology.
Wind accounted for 47% of Denmark’s power usage in 2019, the country’s grid operator Energinet said on Thursday citing preliminary data, up from 41% in 2018 and topping the previous record of 43% in 2017.
European countries are global leaders in utilising wind power but Denmark is far in front of nearest rival Ireland, which sourced 28% of its power from wind in 2018 according to data from industry group WindEurope.
Comment
-
Yep. We know solar is intermittent and its not going to replace fossil fuels in Canada. But what it does do is reduce the use of fossil fuels and reduce carbon emissions. Wind is also in this category.
According to Bloomberg and the IEA, solar and wind are going to play a bigger role in electricity production world wide.
Solar is better adapted to dry southern climates but the southern prairies also have a good solar resource.
A 25 kw solar install will produce about 35000 kwh in the southern prairies.
Peak loads in summer because of AC are getting close to peak loads in winter. So solar is well matched to service the hottest parts of the summer day.
At this point it's not renewables vs fossil fuels which some like to frame the argument. The question is how do we integrate cleaner renewable sources in a cost effective and strategic way to reduce emissions? Canada's hydro resources are an important advantage.
Both Saskatchewan and Alberta have carbon taxes on large emitters and a plan to reduce emissions.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Glad someone brought up Denmark. They certainly do prove that wind energy is possible. If you have agreeable neighbors willing to take the excess if you pay them enough to TAKE it, and provide back up at extortionate rates.
Resulting in this:
Denmark has the most expensive electricity rates for households in Europe, if not the world. The consumer electricity rate in Denmark is about 50% higher than the European average.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostGlad someone brought up Denmark. They certainly do prove that wind energy is possible. If you have agreeable neighbors willing to take the excess if you pay them enough to TAKE it, and provide back up at extortionate rates.
Resulting in this:
[ATTACH]5476[/ATTACH]
Just try and sell that idea.
Another VOLCANO in Philippines, a few more and soon NO summer, will be TOO cold and where can we get more C02!Last edited by fjlip; Jan 12, 2020, 11:53.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostYep. We know solar is intermittent and its not going to replace fossil fuels in Canada. But what it does do is reduce the use of fossil fuels and reduce carbon emissions. Wind is also in this category.
According to Bloomberg and the IEA, solar and wind are going to play a bigger role in electricity production world wide.
Solar is better adapted to dry southern climates but the southern prairies also have a good solar resource.
A 25 kw solar install will produce about 35000 kwh in the southern prairies.
Peak loads in summer because of AC are getting close to peak loads in winter. So solar is well matched to service the hottest parts of the summer day.
At this point it's not renewables vs fossil fuels which some like to frame the argument. The question is how do we integrate cleaner renewable sources in a cost effective and strategic way to reduce emissions? Canada's hydro resources are an important advantage.
Both Saskatchewan and Alberta have carbon taxes on large emitters and a plan to reduce emissions.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment