Originally posted by caseih
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Flu
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
malleefarmer; An anti-parasitic drug available throughout the world has been found to kill COVID-19 within 48 hours. A Monash University-led study has shown a single dose of the drug Ivermectin could stop the SARS-CoV-2 virus growing in cell culture. #coronavirus
Mallee apparently Ivermectin is used on humans all the time:
"Ivermectin Dosage
Medically reviewed by Drugs.com. Last updated on Jan 3, 2020.
OverviewSide EffectsDosageProfessionalInteractionsMore
Applies to the following strengths: 3 mg; 6 mg
Usual Adult Dose for:
Onchocerciasis
Strongyloidiasis
Ascariasis
Cutaneous Larva Migrans
Filariasis
Scabies
Usual Pediatric Dose for:
Filariasis
Additional dosage information:
Renal Dose Adjustments
Liver Dose Adjustments
Dose Adjustments
Precautions
Dialysis
Other Comments
Usual Adult Dose for Onchocerciasis
0.15 mg/kg orally once every 12 months
Patients with heavy ocular infection may require retreatment every 6 months. Retreatment may be considered at intervals as short as 3 months.
Dosage guidelines based on body weight:
15 to 25 kg: 3 mg orally one time
26 to 44 kg: 6 mg orally one time
45 to 64 kg: 9 mg orally one time
65 to 84 kg: 12 mg orally one time
85 kg or more: 0.15 mg/kg orally one time
Usual Adult Dose for Strongyloidiasis
0.2 mg/kg orally once
In immunocompromised (including HIV) patients, the treatment of strongyloidiasis may be refractory requiring repeated treatment (i.e., every 2 weeks) and suppressive therapy (i.e., once a month), although well-controlled studies are not available. Cure may not be achievable in these patients.
Dosage guidelines based on body weight:
15 to 24 kg: 3 mg orally one time
25 to 35 kg: 6 mg orally one time
36 to 50 kg: 9 mg orally one time
51 to 65 kg: 12 mg orally one time
66 to 79 kg: 15 mg orally one time
80 kg or more: 0.2 mg/kg orally one time
Usual Adult Dose for Ascariasis
0.2 mg/kg orally once...
https://www.drugs.com/dosage/ivermectin.html
Drug Companies would never go for this... just like cheap malaria drugs...
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Bulletin
Past issues
Information for contributors
Editorial members
How to order
About the Bulletin
Disclaimer
Mass treatment with ivermectin: an underutilized public health strategy
Rick Speare (1) & David Durrheim (1)
Ivermectin was a revolutionary drug in the 1980s, the forerunner of a new group of antiparasitic agents with activity against both parasitic nematodes and arthropods. Initially it was marketed for veterinary use by Merck & Co. Inc.; it was used largely for nematode control in cattle, horses, pigs and dogs and became the standard for control of the ectoparasitic disease, scabies. The injectable cattle formulation, Ivomec, became the world’s most profitable veterinary drug (1).
Merck recognized Ivermectin’s potential for human use, particularly in the control of filariasis and most notably onchocerciasis, the cause of river blindness in West Africa, in the early 1980s. In collaboration with WHO, nongovernmental organizations and affected national governments, the company initiated a drug donation programme for onchocerciasis control that subsequently became the global model for philanthropic partnerships between pharmaceutical companies and countries unable to afford the drug. Profits from the veterinary use of ivermectin supported this programme (1).
Merck’s patent on ivermectin expired in 1996, though it was extended for different periods in various countries. Thus, other companies’ ivermectin preparations are now commercially available. Bioavailability of drugs depends on formulation and manufacturing processes, so the results obtained with the ivermectin manufactured by Merck may not apply to the new products. It is thus encouraging to see clinical trials evaluating new formulations of this valuable drug.
Heukelbach et al. (pp.563–579) report a study that investigates changes in parasitological parameters and the occurrence of side-effects after treatment with ivermectin in a Brazilian community heavily parasitized with intestinal helminths and ectoparasites. The trial was unblinded and uncontrolled, but provided valuable information. Community members, ineligible for ivermectin, were treated with mebendazole, albendazole or deltamethrin to achieve a high level of coverage. Of particular importance was the finding that ivermectin was highly effective against Strongyloides stercoralis, with a 94% reduction in prevalence that was sustained for nine months. This provided field evidence for a paper that predicted that strongyloidiasis in heavily endemic communities could be successfully controlled with a highly effective drug, owing to its low transmission potential (2). The evidence presented by Heukelbach et al. adds considerably to evidence from smaller-scale controlled trials (3–6).
Ivermectin has valuable public health applications for controlling strongyloidiasis and scabies (by breaking the infection cycle through its the****utic effect) and filariasis, through its effect on transmission. Ivermectin also acts against other intestinal nematodes, but it is not the most effective drug available. In control programmes for filariasis, ivermectin is the drug of choice in areas with onchocerciasis, but can be replaced by diethylcarbamazine for control of other filarial diseases.
Since ivermectin’s use in the human field, adverse reactions occurred in 50% or more of the population (7) and ivermectin was “tainted†with a high adverse reaction profile, despite evidence that the majority of such reactions were attributable to the interaction between the drug and the disease, not to the drug itself (8). A number of follow-up studies have found that inadvertent filariasis mass campaign use of ivermectin during pregnancy has not been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes or negative effects on pregnant women or their offspring (9). The lack of serious adverse events found in the study reported by Heukelbach et al. is reassuring, as the low incidence of minor adverse events fell from 14% after the initial treatment to 5% 10 days later.Last edited by TOM4CWB; Apr 4, 2020, 07:15.
Comment
-
Originally posted by newguy View PostI assume you are referring to the injectable and not the pour on.When our cats get ear mites 2 drops in each ear and they are gone.
Scientists from Monash University in Melbourne showed that a single dose of the drug, Ivermectin, could stop the SARS-CoV-2 virus growing in cell culture - effectively eradicating all genetic material of the virus within 48 hours.
The next steps are to determine the correct human dosage - ensuring the doses shown to effectively treat the virus in the test tube are safe levels for humans.
The use of Ivermectin to combat COVID-19 depends on pre-clinical testing and clinical trials, with funding urgently required to progress the work.
Ivermectin is an FDA-approved anti-parasitic drug that has also been shown to be effective in vitro against a broad range of viruses including HIV, Dengue, Influenza and Zika virus.
The findings of the study were published today in Antiviral Research.
A collaborative study led by Monash University's Biomedicine Discovery Institute (BDI) in Melbourne, Australia, with the Peter Doherty Institute of Infection and Immunity (Doherty Institute), has shown that an anti-parasitic drug already available around the world kills the virus within 48 hours.
The Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute's Dr Kylie Wagstaff, who led the study, said the scientists showed that the drug, Ivermectin, stopped the SARS-CoV-2 virus growing in cell culture within 48 hours.
"We found that even a single dose could essentially remove all viral RNA by 48 hours and that even at 24 hours there was a really significant reduction in it," Dr Wagstaff said.
Ivermectin is an FDA-approved anti-parasitic drug that has also been shown to be effective in vitro against a broad range of viruses including HIV, Dengue, Influenza and Zika virus.
Dr Wagstaff cautioned that the tests conducted in the study were in vitro and that trials needed to be carried out in people.
"Ivermectin is very widely used and seen as a safe drug. We need to figure out now whether the dosage you can use it at in humans will be effective - that's the next step," Dr Wagstaff said.
"In times when we're having a global pandemic and there isn't an approved treatment, if we had a compound that was already available around the world then that might help people sooner. Realistically it's going to be a while before a vaccine is broadly available.
Although the mechanism by which Ivermectin works on the virus is not known, it is likely, based on its action in other viruses, that it works to stop the virus 'dampening down' the host cells' ability to clear it, Dr Wagstaff said.
Royal Melbourne Hospital's Dr Leon Caly, a Senior Medical Scientist at the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (VIDRL) at the Doherty Institute where the experiments with live coronavirus were conducted, is the study's first author.
"As the virologist who was part of the team who were first to isolate and share SARS-COV2 outside of China in January 2020, I am excited about the prospect of Ivermectin being used as a potential drug against COVID-19," Dr Caly said.
Dr Wagstaff made a previous breakthrough finding on Ivermectin in 2012 when she identified the drug and its antiviral activity with Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute's Professor David Jans, also an author on this paper. Professor Jans and his team have been researching Ivermectin for more than 10 years with different viruses.
Dr Wagstaff and Professor Jans started investigating whether it worked on the SARS-CoV-2 virus as soon as the pandemic was known to have started.
The use of Ivermectin to combat COVID-19 would depend on the results of further pre-clinical testing and ultimately clinical trials, with funding urgently required to keep progressing the work, Dr Wagstaff said.
###
Read the full paper in Antiviral Research titled: The FDA-approved Drug Ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011
'This would be too simple...'
If Malaria medicine can work...Last edited by TOM4CWB; Apr 4, 2020, 07:37.
Comment
-
One day does not make a trend, but this is the first day since Italy delved head first into this mess that Serious and Critical numbers have declined. Yesterday they had 4068, today it is 3994. Current hospitalization occupancy has not started to decline yet. Yesterday 28741 in hospital, today 29,010. That's 24 days after they went full quarantine.
Comment
-
Over a 3 day average not including today, % increase in (cases) and [deaths] for a few countries:
Italy: (4.13%) / [5.67%]
Spain: (7.51%) / [9.79%]
Germany: (8.21%) / [18.85%]
France: (7.30%) / [22.95%]-death number is anomalous as it included a significant # of deaths that had not been previously counted. number is trending around 17-19%
Switzerland: (6.82%) / [16.09%]
UK: (14.93%) / [26.36%]
US: (13.52%) / [20.76%]
Canada: (13.44%) / [23.24%]
Comment
-
Updated numbers on cases / 1M population:
Spain: 2668
Switzerland: 2343
Italy: 2061
Belgium: 1590
Austria: 1308
France: 1259
Germany: 1100
Portugal: 1032
Norway: 1024
Netherlands: 970
USA: 887
Israel: 877
Ireland: 865
Denmark: 704
Sweden: 638
UK: 617
Canada: 342
Finland: 340
Australia: 218
New Zealand: 197
Greece: 161
Comment
-
Interesting figures NZ had harshest and quickest lockdown border closure, flight bans in western world then we followed suit maybe 5 days later.
Seems by those figures were doing ok?
Could be geographic wide open spaces could be climatic to a degree pardon the pun.
Most cases in aust are nsw most populace state.
Sad a 5 yr old passed on in UK.
Lots o logical debate on here and illogical I must add.
Not a crime to change your mind or opinion which is rare as rocking horse shit on agriville.
But initially I thought the idea of herd immunity in uk was a measured logical control option, I posted about it way back when some agreed with principle some disagreed.
Well I was wrong could be called a abject failure in fact.
Last comment both sides of the argument on agriville none of us know jack shit or his brother John but best to err on side of caution logic suggests ou tough measures in oz MAY be working as in other countries.
If I was a person who just become unemployed because of cv19 with no idea when normality will resume or if I will have a job to go back might view things way differently.
Comment
-
Guest
Comment
-
Originally posted by malleefarmer View PostInteresting figures NZ had harshest and quickest lockdown border closure, flight bans in western world then we followed suit maybe 5 days later.
Seems by those figures were doing ok?
Could be geographic wide open spaces could be climatic to a degree pardon the pun.
Most cases in aust are nsw most populace state.
Sad a 5 yr old passed on in UK.
Lots o logical debate on here and illogical I must add.
Not a crime to change your mind or opinion which is rare as rocking horse shit on agriville.
But initially I thought the idea of herd immunity in uk was a measured logical control option, I posted about it way back when some agreed with principle some disagreed.
Well I was wrong could be called a abject failure in fact.
Last comment both sides of the argument on agriville none of us know jack shit or his brother John but best to err on side of caution logic suggests ou tough measures in oz MAY be working as in other countries.
If I was a person who just become unemployed because of cv19 with no idea when normality will resume or if I will have a job to go back might view things way differently.
Very interesting to see NZ numbers and quick reactions to ban flights and close boarders . North America left the barn doors open too long.
My oldest brother lost his job , at 53 , his future looks bleak. We will be able to use his help for a few months this spring , we don’t run a big farm with any full time people , but after that it looks grim for him. We will do what we can but there is a ton of jobs being lost weekly in this area. Some jobs will not come back for a very long time.
Will be interesting to watch how NZ holds out and how much their economy is affected .
Comment
-
Our state has 407 cases as of this morning.
Here’s the clincher 85% have come from cruise liner either tourists coming in and spreading it or locals disembarking. Another 4% from airport.
Remainder people to people transmission since.
So if we had harder border restrictions probably be even less.
Ps our population is almost 1.8 million. 78% main city and environs then another 10% in regional cities or large towns meaning 15 thousand or more.
Demographics suggest we’re the state that should have lowest cv19 rate
Comment
-
Originally posted by furrowtickler View PostGood post .
Very interesting to see NZ numbers and quick reactions to ban flights and close boarders . North America left the barn doors open too long.
My oldest brother lost his job , at 53 , his future looks bleak. We will be able to use his help for a few months this spring , we don’t run a big farm with any full time people , but after that it looks grim for him. We will do what we can but there is a ton of jobs being lost weekly in this area. Some jobs will not come back for a very long time.
Will be interesting to watch how NZ holds out and how much their economy is affected .
Issues is can’t export anything at present.
We export heaps to China but there ports are only partially open. And if anyone on here studies pandemics for noteworthy sources it’s not unusual for a second wave to occur sometime after initial outbreak is waiting. If China get another second wave logic suggests rest of world will then were up shite without a paddle o a canoe for that fact.
Sooner they fin a viable vaccine cure antidote the better months away yet it seems.
The anti Vaxxer crowd have gone eerily quite
Try not to get into bs debates about cv19 hopefully ain’t stirred anyone up.
Comment
-
Interestingly, there has apparently been a shortage of Ivermectin this winter. And many complaints about its effectiveness, causing many to redo, or use another product, which are also now back ordered( or were).
Is this just the inevitable result of over use and abuse, resulting in resistance, leading to more applications, and therefore to shortages? Or is the shortage due to it already being rerouted to human use earlier this winter? Maybe the base chemical is made in China with all the rest, and was not quite up to standard as some was redirected to human use, so we got watered down version? Is every batch tested?
I'm sure most of us have breathed, ingested, or absorbed more than our fair share. We did our cows just about the time this was getting to be newsworthy, wonder if it has any preventative effect, or only curative?
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostInterestingly, there has apparently been a shortage of Ivermectin this winter. And many complaints about its effectiveness, causing many to redo, or use another product, which are also now back ordered( or were).
Is this just the inevitable result of over use and abuse, resulting in resistance, leading to more applications, and therefore to shortages? Or is the shortage due to it already being rerouted to human use earlier this winter? Maybe the base chemical is made in China with all the rest, and was not quite up to standard as some was redirected to human use, so we got watered down version? Is every batch tested?
I'm sure most of us have breathed, ingested, or absorbed more than our fair share. We did our cows just about the time this was getting to be newsworthy, wonder if it has any preventative effect, or only curative?
Ivermectin is not really used here a lot for resistance reasons on sheep. Next generation drenches superseded ivermectin hmmm maybe 10/12 years ago. But sure your right though base chemical comes from China and is reconstituted in Canada of Australia were ever
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment