• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Scotland 100% Renewable, Almost

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #37
    Originally posted by jazz View Post
    Carbon tax. $150M alone GST on the tax. So if GST is 5%, that means the carbon tax is bringing in $3B.

    There's your golden subsidy. Tax gouge topped off with a tax on a tax. Don't you just love socialism. What better subsidy than that. Are they doing anything with it? $3B buys a lot of windmills. Where are they?
    Carbon tax isn't a subsidy to renewable energy.

    Comment


      #38
      Which do you think cost more and takes more effort?

      1. Research and develop new systems that convert/produce energy from basically limitless energy sources (waves, sun, wind, geothermal)

      2. **** the ground till the stored energy is gone and pretend it will last forever (by forever i mean your own lifetime)

      There is a shocking theme on here by the majority. Don't do any renewable energy until it costs less then just burning stored energy. It is very easy to spend money from someone else's savings account rather then making money sustainably in your own. This unfortunately is how renewable energy is viewed, that spending money from someone else's savings account is a viable long term strategy.

      Comment


        #39
        Originally posted by tweety View Post
        Carbon tax isn't a subsidy to renewable energy.
        Actually Tweety in Alberta under the former NDP government roughly 1/3 of the C02 tax went to subsidize solar installations and other programs like installation of more energy efficient lighting and to fund rebates for installing more energy efficient heating systems. Justin Trudeau's new tax is really just an income transfer from energy intensive industries to city dwellers.


        In your next post you lecture us on our concern of the cost of electrical generation. Actually my main concern is that electricity won't be available when needed due to the dependence on intermittent rather than proven sources of generation.

        Comment


          #40
          Originally posted by tweety View Post
          Which do you think cost more and takes more effort?
          How are you going to mine the lithium, cobalt, manganese and other rare elements to created your renewable utopia. They are in way shorter supply than hydrocarbons. A good portion of them are lying on the ocean floor. Should we dreg them up? That seems a little disruptive.

          To convert an average country like the UK to all renewables and electric vehicles would require doubling the output of all of those rare elements. Guess we can ask china to do it so your feel better and don't have to see the open mines.

          Comment


            #41
            Originally posted by tweety View Post
            Which do you think cost more and takes more effort?

            1. Research and develop new systems that convert/produce energy from basically limitless energy sources (waves, sun, wind, geothermal)

            2. **** the ground till the stored energy is gone and pretend it will last forever (by forever i mean your own lifetime)

            There is a shocking theme on here by the majority. Don't do any renewable energy until it costs less then just burning stored energy. It is very easy to spend money from someone else's savings account rather then making money sustainably in your own. This unfortunately is how renewable energy is viewed, that spending money from someone else's savings account is a viable long term strategy.
            Can someone cue the violins?

            Comment


              #42
              Spending money from someone else’s savings account is exactly what carbon tax is all about

              Comment


                #43
                Originally posted by Hamloc View Post
                Actually Tweety in Alberta under the former NDP government roughly 1/3 of the C02 tax went to subsidize solar installations and other programs like installation of more energy efficient lighting and to fund rebates for installing more energy efficient heating systems. Justin Trudeau's new tax is really just an income transfer from energy intensive industries to city dwellers.


                In your next post you lecture us on our concern of the cost of electrical generation. Actually my main concern is that electricity won't be available when needed due to the dependence on intermittent rather than proven sources of generation.
                There will be proven sources of power as long as we can just pull them from the ground. As i said above, not a problem for our generation, so let's just take that stored energy and use it up. Screw the future generations, let them figure it out.

                Comment

                • Reply to this Thread
                • Return to Topic List
                Working...