I see by your post, climate change is based on a moving 30 year time period.
Why was 30 years chosen.
Who decided on this figure.
What year was this decided.
Do you personally think thirty years is a long enough time period considering temperature records go back hundreds of millions of years.
To me this seems like a suspicious and ridiculously short period of time to base a decision on that will have life changing consequences for hundreds of thousands of people initially and later millions world wide.
People don't invest money, buy a house, buy equipment or choose a mate in what would be the equivalent of a few seconds of data in a 500 million year time span. More data is good, right?
Global warmers once again look suspect by ignoring valuable data.
Why was 30 years chosen.
Who decided on this figure.
What year was this decided.
Do you personally think thirty years is a long enough time period considering temperature records go back hundreds of millions of years.
To me this seems like a suspicious and ridiculously short period of time to base a decision on that will have life changing consequences for hundreds of thousands of people initially and later millions world wide.
People don't invest money, buy a house, buy equipment or choose a mate in what would be the equivalent of a few seconds of data in a 500 million year time span. More data is good, right?
Global warmers once again look suspect by ignoring valuable data.
Comment