Eco windmills ......

[flea beetle]

You and Chuck beat me to it. I was going to say that this is not the way to attack the green energy scam, because there are similar long term environmental consequences for every energy source, or resource extraction humans do. When the fossil fuel industry is eventually eclipsed, or exhausted, all the pipelines and well casings will remain in the ground(the metal ones will eventually corrode, the plastic or composite may last as long as the blades though, all the wastes pumped into deep wells will remain. Nuclear waste will remain for even longer. The scars from mining etc etc.

But as caseih so correctly points out, the difference is, that unlike wind or solar, in exchange for the environmental legacy of fossil fuels, or nuclear, they powered and enabled civilization on a global scale for centuries already, and likely for centuries to come.

I would be willing to accept that windmills and solar panels have unintended and negative environmental consequences, IF, they had actually served some purpose during their intended lifespan, and done it at a cost that was an improvement over what it replaced. They have failed on both counts, making their environmental transgressions unacceptable.

Not to mention that oil and gas don’t tout themselves as environmentally friendly like “clean energy” does. It is all a farce. “Clean energy” snubs it’s nose at oil and gas environmental footprint all the while closing the door to the closet to hide all the skeletons.

[furrowtickler]

Not to mention that oil and gas don’t tout themselves as environmentally friendly like “clean energy” does. It is all a farce. “Clean energy” snubs it’s nose at oil and gas environmental footprint all the while closing the door to the closet to hide all the skeletons.

That’s the point , not attacking , just pointing out the hypocrisy is all .

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Not to mention that oil and gas don’t tout themselves as environmentally friendly like “clean energy” does. It is all a farce. “Clean energy” snubs it’s nose at oil and gas environmental footprint all the while closing the door to the closet to hide all the skeletons.

Definitely, the attitude of the Chuck's of the world, that their sh** doesn't smell, is definitely coming back to haunt them. And the labels of clean and green, or even renewable certainly aren't justified.

But there is so much other low hanging fruit that can be used to discredit this folly, and unlike the ecological footprint, it can't be turned around and use against the reliable energy sources they try so hard to denigrate.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

That’s the point , not attacking , just pointing out the hypocrisy is all .

But hypocrisy is not only a badge of honour to these brainwashed shills, it seems to be a prerequisite. They seem to be proud when you point it out to them. Cognitive dissonance at its finest.

[chuckChuck]

The only way to assess the environmental impact of anything is too do a life cycle analysis taking into account all the positives and negatives including the external costs not accounted for.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

The only way to assess the environmental impact of anything is too do a life cycle analysis taking into account all the positives and negatives including the external costs not accounted for.

Speaking of life cycle, here is a good place to start doing your lifecycle analysis:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/energy/windpower/9770837/Wind-farm-turbines-wear-sooner-than-expected-says-study.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/energy/windpower/9770837/Wind-farm-turbines-wear-sooner-than-expected-says-study.html

The report concludes that a wind turbine will typically generate more than twice as much electricity in its first year than when it is 15 years old.

The report’s author, Prof Gordon Hughes, an economist at Edinburgh University and a former energy adviser to the World Bank, discovered that the “load factor” — the efficiency rating of a turbine based on the percentage of electricity it actually produces compared with its theoretical maximum — is reduced from 24 per cent in the first 12 months of operation to just 11 per cent after 15 years.

The decline in the output of offshore wind farms, based on a study of Danish wind farms, appears even more dramatic. The load factor for turbines built on platforms in the sea is reduced from 39 per cent to 15 per cent after 10 years.

Prof Hughes said in his conclusion: “Adjusted for age and wind availability, the overall performance of wind farms in the UK has deteriorated markedly since the beginning of the century.

[Guest]

Was just pricing out a barrel of motor oil and pump instead of ****ing around with jugs and pails anymore
Was surprised to find out they dont take barrels back anymore ?
That was a good system and environmentally friendly
Fu ck we are going backwards ?
Asked retailer in saskatoon what the fu ck i do with old barrels , he said they work good to burn chemical jugs in
What a fu cked up system
Or i guess we can put barrels in landfill with blades off of wind turbines and all the fu cked up home appliances that only last until warranty is off now

[fjlip]

Was just pricing out a barrel of motor oil and pump instead of ****ing around with jugs and pails anymore
Was surprised to find out they dont take barrels back anymore ?
That was a good system and environmentally friendly
Fu ck we are going backwards ?
Asked retailer in saskatoon what the fu ck i do with old barrels , he said they work good to burn chemical jugs in
What a fu cked up system
Or i guess we can put barrels in landfill with blades off of wind turbines and all the fu cked up home appliances that only last until warranty is off now

Yes basically it NEVER pays to recycle anything at all! What a shame. Being GREEN cost more every time so business will not ruin their bottom line. There are many horror stories of feel good recycle programs ending up in landfills. Quebec plastic recycle recently in the news, went broke.

Canada should copy Sweden and BURN it all to generate heat/energy. End of problem...