Originally posted by mustardman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Oh....oh!!!!!!!
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Guest
Originally posted by mustardman View PostSo no One has answered why they Pick and Choose the science they believe in...
Exxon Knew for years beginning in Early 60’s the damage the increased C02 would do.
Kept it hush and then later heavily funded The Denial Side
The Insurance Companies know it’s happening
Politician know it
Even The Pope knows it
So again Why do you pick and choose the science you believe
Comment
-
Say a theory was developed and you said this science is settled. For instance, you have the theory of gravity for orbital bodies totally cased, its sound, trust me and and 97% of publicly funded mouse maze scientists agree with you. And you got the drooling MSM to totally buy in and parrot it every day.
Then your theory predicted the moon would slam into the earth the next day and it didnt happen, but you claim it will happen, the next day, and then the next and it still doesnt happen even after 20 yrs of the same prediction and you even get the gullible govts to throw a moon tax on everyone which you redistribute to believers, my friend, you aint a scientist anymore. Cult leader is more like it.
Comment
-
“Why do you pick and choose what science to believe ?â€
Simple , we don’t live in North Korea, and there are a lot of scientific studies that debunk the climatology cult belief
Also when the UN , the main driver of the cult with the con men at IPCC , including Gore, have openly stated the carbon tax has little to do with climate change but is a defacto for the distribution of wealth....... that’s why most of us consider “Other†science .
Comment
-
Originally posted by mustardman View Post
So again anyone out there, Why pick and choose the science you believe? ( and I’m talking peer reviewed,not ‘science’ from ‘Wing nut weekly’
Comment
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by mustardman View PostPost secondary -industrial Chemical Technology- As well as farmed for 46 years
Any other industry, group, govt forecasting anything 25, 50 and 100 yrs out, especially based on a theory that has failed every prediction it has made in the pas 30 yrs.
Have you actually seen any real science conferences? I will just let you know, they are still debating the big bang and that theory predates climate change.
Have you ever seen the response to any scientific issue become a govt tax with redistribution? Any scientific basis for anything like that in our history?
Are scientists infallible? I will remind you the food guide stood for 35+ years and created a nation of diabetics.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jazz View PostThen you should have a keen eye for critical thinking. Let me see;
Any other industry, group, govt forecasting anything 25, 50 and 100 yrs out, especially based on a theory that has failed every prediction it has made in the pas 30 yrs.
Have you actually seen any real science conferences? I will just let you know, they are still debating the big bang and that theory predates climate change.
Have you ever seen the response to any scientific issue become a govt tax with redistribution? Any scientific basis for anything like that in our history?
Are scientists infallible? I will remind you the food guide stood for 35+ years and created a nation of diabetics.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mustardman View PostI WAS - if you think of out in the field at 10 or 11 years of age learning the in and outs of agriculture as being homeschooled.
This whole thing about education is nuts really. I have conversations with a whole spectrum of people on all sides of different issues and I don't automatically discount someone's opinion because they went to tech versus holding a master's degree and likewise I don't accept an opinion blindly because it was touted by someone who might have a Phd over a tech certificate.
My own life experience and information gets weighed as part of all information collected. If something doesn't appear to make sense on the surface I may not accept a finding until there is more evidence. Maybe I am a doubting Thomas but so far it has served me well through my life.
I firmly believe that you have every right to your opinion as do I.
Comment
-
The predictions on Temperature in relation to CO2 from the Charney Group in 1979 - 41 years Ago is bang on.
The nasa models of prediction Also came to pass.
Wing- Nut weekly will tell you there is no crisis ,every thing is normal but there have been HEAT waves around the world ,and warmest years have All come lately.
Pine bark beetles expanding territory
Wood ticks , west Nile mosquitoes, more violent hurricanes, acidifying oceans, more bush fires
Oh yea right No predictions have come to pass. Lol
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment