Oh....oh!!!!!!!

[LEP]

Al Gore is Not a scientist
But what he Was Relaying was Peer reviewed science

Were you homeschooled?

[Oliver88]

Al Gore is Not a scientist
But what he Was Relaying was Peer reviewed science

BAHAHAHA.......how did his 2012 prediction turn out?

What is your level of education and what discipline?

[Guest]

So no One has answered why they Pick and Choose the science they believe in...

Exxon Knew for years beginning in Early 60’s the damage the increased C02 would do.

Kept it hush and then later heavily funded The Denial Side
The Insurance Companies know it’s happening
Politician know it
Even The Pope knows it
So again Why do you pick and choose the science you believe

But, but... why did obama buy that multi million $ mansion on the water ?

[jazz]

Say a theory was developed and you said this science is settled. For instance, you have the theory of gravity for orbital bodies totally cased, its sound, trust me and and 97% of publicly funded mouse maze scientists agree with you. And you got the drooling MSM to totally buy in and parrot it every day.

Then your theory predicted the moon would slam into the earth the next day and it didnt happen, but you claim it will happen, the next day, and then the next and it still doesnt happen even after 20 yrs of the same prediction and you even get the gullible govts to throw a moon tax on everyone which you redistribute to believers, my friend, you aint a scientist anymore. Cult leader is more like it.

[furrowtickler]

“Why do you pick and choose what science to believe ?”

Simple , we don’t live in North Korea, and there are a lot of scientific studies that debunk the climatology cult belief
Also when the UN , the main driver of the cult with the con men at IPCC , including Gore, have openly stated the carbon tax has little to do with climate change but is a defacto for the distribution of wealth....... that’s why most of us consider “Other” science .

[AlbertaFarmer5]

So again anyone out there, Why pick and choose the science you believe? ( and I’m talking peer reviewed,not ‘science’ from ‘Wing nut weekly’

So, are the IPCC reports considered part of Wing Nut Weekly? I posted a graph from the IPCC 1990 report, can you kindly post some peer reviewed science that debunks the IPCC's claim that sea ice was much lower during the satellite record prior to 1979 when Chucks graph starts?

[A990]

So again anyone out there, Why pick and choose the science you believe? ( and I’m talking peer reviewed,not ‘science’ from ‘Wing nut weekly’

...predictive validity

[AlbertaFarmer5]

...predictive validity

Best response in the entire History of This futile debate on agriville. Extra points for only using two words.

[mustardman]

BAHAHAHA.......how did his 2012 prediction turn out?

What is your level of education and what discipline?

Post secondary -industrial Chemical Technology- As well as farmed for 46 years

[mustardman]

Were you homeschooled?

I WAS - if you think of out in the field at 10 or 11 years of age learning the in and outs of agriculture as being homeschooled.

[jazz]

Post secondary -industrial Chemical Technology- As well as farmed for 46 years

Then you should have a keen eye for critical thinking. Let me see;

Any other industry, group, govt forecasting anything 25, 50 and 100 yrs out, especially based on a theory that has failed every prediction it has made in the pas 30 yrs.

Have you actually seen any real science conferences? I will just let you know, they are still debating the big bang and that theory predates climate change.

Have you ever seen the response to any scientific issue become a govt tax with redistribution? Any scientific basis for anything like that in our history?

Are scientists infallible? I will remind you the food guide stood for 35+ years and created a nation of diabetics.

[fjlip]

Then you should have a keen eye for critical thinking. Let me see;

Any other industry, group, govt forecasting anything 25, 50 and 100 yrs out, especially based on a theory that has failed every prediction it has made in the pas 30 yrs.

Have you actually seen any real science conferences? I will just let you know, they are still debating the big bang and that theory predates climate change.

Have you ever seen the response to any scientific issue become a govt tax with redistribution? Any scientific basis for anything like that in our history?

Are scientists infallible? I will remind you the food guide stood for 35+ years and created a nation of diabetics.

Well stated, BIGGEST failure is NO PREDICTIONS have come to pass! If there are NONE, why believe the DOOMSDAY ones? Please give us ONE that has been predicted!