I had a problem with moisture on oats I was selling last summer. The mills electronic tester showed .5-1.0 percent higher than my 919 and put it over the 13.5. The we’re going to reject some loads but somehow agreed to take it with a discount - that’s pretty steep. So I took a sample to the grain commission and they got 13.5 on their 919. The mill got 14.2 on theirs. I held my ground and they realized how pissed I was and dropped the discounts.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Moisture testers
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
The elevators have learned to use it to their advantage $$. The local Richardson terminal had a 919 and a electronic tester both on the bench. The electronic one was to test the oats coming in and it always tests 1 point higher on oats than the 919. They know it but the company says they have to use the results from the electronic one. The company isn’t stupid they can make money on shrink and drying.
Comment
-
Where is it that any equipment other than the 919 is allowed and who/when was it allowed. Only been the last couple years that they have showed up. Also the protein machines have moisture built in why not use them if they don't have to use 919? Sure is weird stuff going on these days. Guessing the guys that want to totally get rid of regulation and run self regulation are getting their way.
Comment
-
Wouldn’t this be a novel project for the Canadian Grain Commission, to have all licensed elevators be required to electronically report calibration with proof of calibration, date time and employee sign off , verification, settings or calibration changes, etc.
The monies that are made or lost are way more substantial on moisture/protein/oil/falling number etc. now than scale ticket/ electronic scales ( which used to be a problem - remember the balance beams?)
This is worthy work for the CGC, provides value and protects the Canadian system with open and full disclosure. Would the producer lobby groups (commodity groups) support such activities ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rareearth View PostWouldn’t this be a novel project for the Canadian Grain Commission, to have all licensed elevators be required to electronically report calibration with proof of calibration, date time and employee sign off , verification, settings or calibration changes, etc.
The monies that are made or lost are way more substantial on moisture/protein/oil/falling number etc. now than scale ticket/ electronic scales ( which used to be a problem - remember the balance beams?)
This is worthy work for the CGC, provides value and protects the Canadian system with open and full disclosure. Would the producer lobby groups (commodity groups) support such activities ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by wiseguyI forgot about those balance beams !
The memories !
I am glad tho I had a chance to haul to the elevators in our local town before they shut em all down !
We had UGG, Pioneer, Cargill, and Sask Wheat Pool within 5 miles !
For our Farm those were great times !
Comment
-
And now, boys and girls, you see why our grandfathers and great grandfathers revolted against the "line companies" and set up the Pools a hundred years ago. All those stories we used to hear and quietly snicker at behind the old men's backs really weren't bullshit after all. In the end the Pools were no better than the line companies but they did provide competition to the families. The concept was revived with the farmer-owned terminals but the original shareholders have taken their money and ran, the families added those terminals to their warm embrace, and so here we are.
The grain commission might as well fold for all the good they do. Send in your harvest samples, get your wheat graded 2 Red. Then take the same samples to the elevators and bingo, it's 3 RS. "But the GC said it's a 2." "Oh no we have to go by our grading." Pick at each load's sample with the magnifying glass and tweezers - what the hell did I bother collecting all those pails of samples for at harvest? Waste of time and gas running all over the country with samples.
God I'm glad retirement is near.
Comment
-
Originally posted by oldjim View PostAnd now, boys and girls, you see why our grandfathers and great grandfathers revolted against the "line companies" and set up the Pools a hundred years ago. All those stories we used to hear and quietly snicker at behind the old men's backs really weren't bullshit after all. In the end the Pools were no better than the line companies but they did provide competition to the families. The concept was revived with the farmer-owned terminals but the original shareholders have taken their money and ran, the families added those terminals to their warm embrace, and so here we are.
The grain commission might as well fold for all the good they do. Send in your harvest samples, get your wheat graded 2 Red. Then take the same samples to the elevators and bingo, it's 3 RS. "But the GC said it's a 2." "Oh no we have to go by our grading." Pick at each load's sample with the magnifying glass and tweezers - what the hell did I bother collecting all those pails of samples for at harvest? Waste of time and gas running all over the country with samples.
God I'm glad retirement is near.
There are ways of helping farmers and saving or maybe getting back our industry to producers but not so sure the will of the ones we have let in charge at produce level is there. Wonder how our forefathers that realized and made a reality of CGC (In the Interest of Producers) and farmer owned elevator system got together there was a lot more of them back then and no communication like today.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment