• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Seed Tax - is this a "toe in the water?"

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by wiseguy
    Sumdum and bucket what yous waiting for ??

    Go protest !
    The WCWGA and APAS people will probably show up to give me a stern talking to.

    Comment


      #17
      Hey I have no problem with
      Someone being rewarded for their
      Innovation . And exactly how that
      Is collected is not really the issue

      The issue is the restriction of access
      To any seed.
      Once you remove access to any other
      Options for seed.
      The value of your innovation is not
      What determines price, but the value
      Of cartel does.

      Canola for example.
      You cannot buy 25 year old Quest.
      RR canola seed for 1/3 or 1/4 the
      Cost of the new stuff.
      You should be able to but you are
      Not allowed to.
      (user agreements, canceled varieties etc.)

      If you could seed them, you have a basis to value
      the newer varieties improvements.

      When it is all done ,there will only be 3 corporations
      Own every seed. No public , no Secan, gone just like
      Canola

      Once you grant them their seed cartel.
      They do not even have to innovate.
      Why bother
      They have got you by the balls already,
      Because you can not use even 30 year old
      Varieties.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by sawfly1 View Post
        Hey I have no problem with
        Someone being rewarded for their
        Innovation . And exactly how that
        Is collected is not really the issue

        ...

        Once you grant them their seed cartel.
        They do not even have to innovate.
        Why bother
        They have got you by the balls already,
        Because you can not use even 30 year old
        Varieties.
        Bad Choice with Quest RR Canola Sawfly,
        Quest was a Monsanto RR Canola with contamination in the RR genetics. Monsanto had an obligation to pull Quest from the seed bank in western Canada.

        Western Producer 2001:

        "Quest is a Roundup Ready variety that was created by Monsanto Canada and produced, multiplied and sold to farmers by Agricore and Sask Pool.

        Routine quality assurance tests conducted by the pool earlier this spring unveiled “trace levels” of an unwanted gene in the genetically modified crop.

        Monsanto confirmed the problem on April 16 and immediately notified the federal government that the variety was being recalled.

        Monsanto spokesperson Trish Jordan stressed that the GM canola is being recalled because of trade implications, not for food safety reasons.

        She said the GT-200 gene that was discovered in the variety is “almost identical” to the GT-73 gene that makes Quest resistant to the Roundup Ready herbicide. Monsanto developed both genes simultaneously, but chose to commercialize GT-73 rather than GT-200."

        Sawfly;

        If western Canadian Farmers allow the 'NSO utopia' to terminate the CSGA and our farmer rights under the Canada Seeds Act.... then by allowing varieties developed by public AAFC/University plant breeding; genetic advancements being funded by Western Canadian Farmer/Producer checkoff programs... to then enforce Trailing royalties with acreage fees for many years on these publically developed genetics/varieties... enforced by CPTA through NSO records...

        that would be a real shift in who controls seeds in western Canada to the Seed Trade... with farmers largely paying for the advancements in future varieties... without compensation for our many investments.

        Comment

        • Reply to this Thread
        • Return to Topic List
        Working...