Originally posted by mustardman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Canada, a huge carbon sink
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
Try measuring our carbon footprint in economic terms, like emissions per unit real GDP and emissions per unit real parity purchase power. You will see that a 1M people strike way above the world average in those areas. Which means any policy to the contary like a carbon tax instantly makes us poorer.
Comment
-
Imagine our per capita output had the ndp still been in power? You know, back when our population was at 930 000, not almost 1.2 million. Low population growth, just what the commies want...
Comment
-
Originally posted by mustardman View PostSaskatchewan is one of the Largest CO2 Emitters on the planet.....per capita
WIth Scott Moe's growth plan we should be reducing our per capita emissions...per capita measurement is a bit illogical...Last edited by bucket; Mar 7, 2020, 07:29.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mustardman View PostSaskatchewan is one of the Largest CO2 Emitters on the planet.....per capita
Comment
-
Canada's total carbon sink would have been larger prior to settlement because grassland soils and forests held large amounts of carbon in equilibrium. Carbon is still released through decomposition in equilibrium but the inputs equal outputs with some year to year variability.
Soils can only hold so much carbon before they hit a certain maximum after that it is difficult to add additional carbon unless grasslands change to forest.
Farmers should be paid to sequester carbon but that will mean they will also have to pay when grasslands are broken up, trees are cutdown, or farm practices release carbon.
If all the grasslands are returned to grazing that would store the maximum amount of carbon. Increasing soil organic matter is a long process in cropping systems especially when conventional tillage is used. Grazing systems can do it faster.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostCanada's total carbon sink would have been larger prior to settlement because grassland soils and forests held large amounts of carbon in equilibrium. Carbon is still released through decomposition in equilibrium but the inputs equal outputs with some year to year variability.
Soils can only hold so much carbon before they hit a certain maximum after that it is difficult to add additional carbon unless grasslands change to forest.
Farmers should be paid to sequester carbon but that will mean they will also have to pay when grasslands are broken up, trees are cutdown, or farm practices release carbon.
If all the grasslands are returned to grazing that would store the maximum amount of carbon. Increasing soil organic matter is a long process in cropping systems especially when conventional tillage is used. Grazing systems can do it faster.
As you know virtually no one uses conventional tillage in western Canada anymore. The last one in your area rented his land out a few years ago.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostGrazing systems can do it faster.
The natural grass where we farmed was about as high as your ankle and finished its intensive growth season a month before our crops did.Last edited by jazz; Mar 7, 2020, 10:26.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment