• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Canada, a huge carbon sink

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by mustardman View Post
    Saskatchewan is one of the Largest CO2 Emitters on the planet.....per capita
    And so Mustard. Maybe we should scroll down one more level. Perhaps you are one of the worst emitters in the Province and should get hammered worse than the rest.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by mustardman View Post
      Saskatchewan is one of the Largest CO2 Emitters on the planet.....per capita
      Shoot yourself in the foot much? Believe in self harm much?

      Comment


        #13
        Try measuring our carbon footprint in economic terms, like emissions per unit real GDP and emissions per unit real parity purchase power. You will see that a 1M people strike way above the world average in those areas. Which means any policy to the contary like a carbon tax instantly makes us poorer.

        Comment


          #14
          Imagine our per capita output had the ndp still been in power? You know, back when our population was at 930 000, not almost 1.2 million. Low population growth, just what the commies want...

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by mustardman View Post
            Saskatchewan is one of the Largest CO2 Emitters on the planet.....per capita
            There is an article in the Western Producer about a greenhouse in Alberta.....they blow C02 into the greenhouse to make things grow better...interesting concept...

            WIth Scott Moe's growth plan we should be reducing our per capita emissions...per capita measurement is a bit illogical...
            Last edited by bucket; Mar 7, 2020, 07:29.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by mustardman View Post
              Saskatchewan is one of the Largest CO2 Emitters on the planet.....per capita
              So I am curious Mustardman have ever thought past your statement, the why and how of Saskatchewan residents being the "largest C02 emitters on the planet.....per capita." Saskatchewan has roughly 31.3 acres of crop land per capita, by comparison Alberta has 5.48 acres per capita. I would say with a relatively small population Saskatchewan's economy is based on export. So now that you have made this sanctimonious statement how do you propose that you lower Saskatchewan's C02 output with its small population and it industries that export goods to survive?!

              Comment


                #17
                Canada's total carbon sink would have been larger prior to settlement because grassland soils and forests held large amounts of carbon in equilibrium. Carbon is still released through decomposition in equilibrium but the inputs equal outputs with some year to year variability.

                Soils can only hold so much carbon before they hit a certain maximum after that it is difficult to add additional carbon unless grasslands change to forest.

                Farmers should be paid to sequester carbon but that will mean they will also have to pay when grasslands are broken up, trees are cutdown, or farm practices release carbon.

                If all the grasslands are returned to grazing that would store the maximum amount of carbon. Increasing soil organic matter is a long process in cropping systems especially when conventional tillage is used. Grazing systems can do it faster.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                  Canada's total carbon sink would have been larger prior to settlement because grassland soils and forests held large amounts of carbon in equilibrium. Carbon is still released through decomposition in equilibrium but the inputs equal outputs with some year to year variability.

                  Soils can only hold so much carbon before they hit a certain maximum after that it is difficult to add additional carbon unless grasslands change to forest.

                  Farmers should be paid to sequester carbon but that will mean they will also have to pay when grasslands are broken up, trees are cutdown, or farm practices release carbon.

                  If all the grasslands are returned to grazing that would store the maximum amount of carbon. Increasing soil organic matter is a long process in cropping systems especially when conventional tillage is used. Grazing systems can do it faster.
                  When you return all your farm to grassland let us know .
                  As you know virtually no one uses conventional tillage in western Canada anymore. The last one in your area rented his land out a few years ago.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                    Grazing systems can do it faster.
                    What a crock. Where in the f did you get that idea? Intensive continuous cropping of annuals sequesters way more CO2 than idle grasslands.

                    The natural grass where we farmed was about as high as your ankle and finished its intensive growth season a month before our crops did.
                    Last edited by jazz; Mar 7, 2020, 10:26.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Some people likely won't be satisfied until Western Canada is entirely grazed by buffalo.
                      Hope they all have the cash to live in Jane Fonda's zip code.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...