• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is it time for Moe to step up????

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by TASFarms View Post
    Why is there no irrigation in the palliser triangle. Would be the best place to add irrigation.
    Because no farmer wants to get out their chequebook. The largest irrigation districts in Saskatchewan were taxpayer funded and after 30 years were sold to the districts a few years ago for a dollar. The asset transfer - search it on Western Producer website for more info.

    Then the Saskatchewan government is continuing to fund the districts 40 dollars an acre for 5 years and pick up the deficiencies found by a government funded engineering report . The Riverhurst district is picking up close to a million dollars a year in taxpayer funding for 15000 acres.

    Only 5 percent of the total acres in irrigation that the taxpayer funded are in higher value crops.

    Many companies have came with government backing and then left.

    Potato barns were sold for 5 cent on the dollar.

    Taxpayers are picking up the major costs of the current proposed project on the west side. All the soils to find out which quarters are irrigatible is taxpayer money. If a farmer can't afford the 2500 per quarter to sled their land , there is a good chance they can't afford to buy the $200000 pivot per quarter.

    Farmers over there are still blaming the NDP government after 40 years for shitcanning the west side project but in 40 years that group never got their cheque books out to complete it.

    Do you need more clarification.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by TASFarms View Post
      Why is there no irrigation in the palliser triangle. Would be the best place to add irrigation.
      Lack of water.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by bucket View Post
        And do what Devine did back in 1988 or just ignore the problem in agriculture...

        Devine mortgaged the province.....excellent bet when you look back...

        Do you think Scott Moe has that type of vision for the province?
        According to the Fraser Institute the Sask Party has Increased our prov.debt 90 % which is even Higher than Trudeau's increase at 83% !!!
        So I think our province is Already Mortgaged to the Hilt
        The gang who couldnt shoot straight is in charge and couldn't organize a 2 car parade when it comes to handling money

        I dont think its time for Moe to Step up but it is time for him to Step Down

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by mustardman View Post
          According to the Fraser Institute the Sask Party has Increased our prov.debt 90 % which is even Higher than Trudeau's increase at 83% !!!
          So I think our province is Already Mortgaged to the Hilt
          The gang who couldnt shoot straight is in charge and couldn't organize a 2 car parade when it comes to handling money

          I dont think its time for Moe to Step up but it is time for him to Step Down
          Likewise Romanow eviscerated the province after Devines spending but 35 years later we benefit from Devines spending but nothing to show from Roy. Not saying the Devine era didn’t blow money on stupid things and Roy had to clean up stuff but at a cost to future prosperity which the Sask party had to spend to get back into the 21 century. Can’t completely fault the Sask party spending as deficits in physical infrastructure were more than apparent after the NDP era. If you don’t realize this you’ve had your head up your ass for 35 years.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by WiltonRanch View Post
            Likewise Romanow eviscerated the province after Devines spending but 35 years later we benefit from Devines spending but nothing to show from Roy. Not saying the Devine era didn’t blow money on stupid things and Roy had to clean up stuff but at a cost to future prosperity which the Sask party had to spend to get back into the 21 century. Can’t completely fault the Sask party spending as deficits in physical infrastructure were more than apparent after the NDP era. If you don’t realize this you’ve had your head up your ass for 35 years.
            IF Devine would have had the Good Fortune that our current govt has had with Great Crops, Commodity Booms etc. he would have been Laughing.
            As far as Romanow eviserating???? there was 1 hospital closed , the others were turned into Long term care facilities. The credit card was chopped and we didnt have to declare bankruptcy which was a good thing.
            Funny how Sask Party hasnt REOpened these hospitals after 16 years???

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by mustardman View Post
              IF Devine would have had the Good Fortune that our current govt has had with Great Crops, Commodity Booms etc. he would have been Laughing.
              As far as Romanow eviserating???? there was 1 hospital closed , the others were turned into Long term care facilities. The credit card was chopped and we didnt have to declare bankruptcy which was a good thing.
              Funny how Sask Party hasnt REOpened these hospitals after 16 years???
              Good god what about roads university funding relying on land tax to fund 60% of education costs cause of a flat economy because no one would invest here. The largest exodus of people out of this province during that time was an indicator. I understand romanow had to do what he did but he didn’t do any more to encourage growth. I’ll give credit to Calvert for at least trying. He brought the synchrotron which has helped the tech cluster at the UofS. He tried but ndp was done by then. All the ndp was successful doing for years was brainwashing the people things were as good as they were going to be and you better accept it or leave. What kind of prosperity and positivity does that encourage.

              Comment

              • Reply to this Thread
              • Return to Topic List
              Working...