• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who thought Norway was "hitting it"?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #25
    Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
    https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/why-has-canada-spent-billions-of-dollars-buying-saudi-arabian-oil https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/why-has-canada-spent-billions-of-dollars-buying-saudi-arabian-oil

    Saudi Arabia supplies about 10 per cent of Canada’s oil imports. Canada, in turn, is responsible for buying roughly 1.5 per cent of total Saudi oil exports. What’s more, Saudi Arabia is climbing the leader board of countries that Canada’s relies upon for its foreign oil. As recently as 2010, Saudi Arabia ranked as Canada’s fifth largest supplier of foreign oil (behind Algeria, Norway, the U.K. and Kazakhstan). Now, Saudi Arabia is second only to the United States.

    Alberta and Saudi oil aren’t necessarily the same thing
    On paper, Canada could become energy self-sufficient tomorrow. Every day we produce about 3.9 million barrels of oil per day, and use less than 2 million barrels. A study this year from the Canadian Energy Research Institute even calculated that energy self-sufficiency might reduce emissions. But think of oil like whiskey: There are many different types and qualities. A bourbon connoisseur probably isn’t going to be happy with a bottle of Old Crow and a Manhattan isn’t going to taste the same if it’s made out of Scotch. Similarly, Alberta oil is not interchangeable with the stuff coming out of Saudi Arabia. Andrew Leach, an energy economist at the University of Alberta, even said that comparing the two is like comparing apples and oranges. “Saudi crude and WCS (Western Canadian Select) doesn’t overlap much in terms of their markets,” he told the National Post. For one thing, most eastern Canadian refineries cannot process bitumen, the thick tar-like hydrocarbon that comes out of the Athabasca Oil Sands. Almost anybody can process Saudi Arabian crude, but only an elite fraternity of the world’s most complex refineries can turn Alberta bitumen into gasoline. To get to the east coast, Canadian oil also has to be shipped overland from more than 4,000 kilometres away, significantly adding to its total costs (Saudi Arabia is 10,000 kilometres away from the Canadian east coast, but tanker shipment is cheap). It’s also why Western Canadian Select, the industry name for most oil sands bitumen, sells at such a steep discount to more conventional oil types coming out of Saudi Arabia. In June, for instance, WCS sold at an average of USD$52.10 a barrel, compared to USD$67.87 for West Texas Intermediate (WTI), an oil category priced similarly to most Middle Eastern oils. “The oil Alberta produces is simply of a lower quality than … WTI, and is located farther away from customers,” writes the Alberta government in an online briefing note describing the WCS “discount.”

    Even with a pipeline, it’s not a guarantee that refineries would buy Canadian
    The cancelled Energy East pipeline, of course, would have pumped Saskatchewan and Alberta petroleum into New Brunswick. Politicians touted the pipeline as a way to supplant foreign suppliers such as Saudi Arabia. “We believe this nation-building project would have benefited all of Canada through new jobs, investment, energy security and the ability to displace oil being imported into Canada from overseas,” Alberta premier Rachel Notley said upon the project’s cancellation. However, refineries are no different than a driver cruising gas stations looking for a fill-up: They seek out whoever has the best price and buy accordingly. If Alberta can’t sell its oil on the Atlantic Coast for a lower price than Saudi Arabia, refineries aren’t going to buy it — particularly if they can’t process it. “Getting product from Western Canada, while conceptually sounding like a good way to push out Saudi oil, doesn’t fix everything,” said Jason Parent with the Canadian oil industry analyst Kent Group. As of press time, WCS is currently selling at an incredible $30 discount over more conventional oil types. While this would likely be enough to entice Atlantic buyers, the discount isn’t always so competitive — particularly if Saudi Arabia is actively trying to overproduce and drop oil prices in order to kneecap the Canadian and U.S. oil industry. This is part of the reason why Canada never built a pipeline to the east coast in the first place. A west-to-east pipeline was indeed considered soon after the discovery of oil in Alberta in the 1940s, but it was soon scrapped. “Eastern provinces did the math and found it cheaper to import foreign oil by tanker, rather than bother with the extra cost of domestic supply,” said Peter Tertzakian, director of the Calgary-based Arc Energy Research Institute. However, even if the business case is a little complicated, Tertzakian still advocates a pipeline as something Canada should do for strategic reasons. “We could be completely self sufficient if we wanted,” he said. “It’s just a question of how much we are willing to pay for it.”
    A young moose posing for pictures along the highway near Tweedside, New Brunswick in 2014. It’s highly likely those cars are fuelled by Saudi oil. Bruce and Beatrice Messer via Stefan Morrone

    Canada can’t really hurt Saudi Arabia’s bottom line
    The easiest way for Canada to cut off Saudi Arabia imports would be simply to buy more American oil. It’s about the same price, it doesn’t require specialized facilities and considering that they already buy so much of ours, there’s a certain justice to it. The U.S. also has an excellent human rights record compared to the Saudis. But while such a move might assuage Canada’s moral compass, the practical effect would be almost nil. It’s a seller’s market for oil right now. Production of U.S. shale oil is slowing down, Iran is being hammered by sanctions and petroleum demand continues to tick upwards all over the world. All this means that if Canada could successfully prevent a drop of Saudi oil from ever entering our borders again, it’s unlikely that Riyadh would ever notice. Any oil tanker turned away at Saint John could simply set course for New Jersey. Unlike Canada, Saudi Arabia sells a product that is easy to transport and that can be processed by almost anyone. Said Andrew Leach, “Saudi oil will still sell at the world price.”
    While alternative energy will eventually cut into the Saudi royal family’s palace-gilding budget, Canada probably won’t be able to touch it. Mark Wilson/Getty Images
    So what is it? Alberta crude is too expensive or it sells at a discount. Cant be both.

    Comment


      #26
      Oh sure it can
      Its the Libtard way , flavour of the day
      Ok for SA to tell us to fu ck off with our wheat but not ok to tell them to shove their filthy dirty blood soaked oil up their ass

      Comment


        #27
        I have asked this question before but no one has ever answered it so I will try again.
        Could someone please show me where in Canada's accounts is the payments for Canada is buying Saudi Oil?

        Most here overlook that the 100,000 barrels a day of oil that is imported to Canada is not being paid for by Canada but by private refineries, mainly Irving Oil. You overlook the fact the problem and costs of moving oil to the east coast. And as we see now, you ignore the fact that the production costs of Canadian oil is higher than that of Saudi oil and they will always beat Canada in a oil price war. And that even if we have a pipeline, it is no guarantee that Irving would use WCS as it is more expensive both to produce and refine.

        So are all the self proclaimed "capitalists" on this site actually demanding that private industry should not be allowed to buy their inputs from who ever they choose? If you feel Canada should force all Canadian refineries to only use Canadian oil are you also in favor of government regulation forcing you to only buy your inputs, and equipment from Canadian suppliers regardless of supply or cost? And if you want the government to have the power to say what can be bought, expect they will also be empowered to limit who and what you can sell. And of course, as an agricultural exporter, I am sure our trading partners who we tell to screw off will be very receptive to buying our grain. Please, all socialists in favor of banning imports of oil, speak up!

        Comment


          #28
          Canada doesn't some useless Ervin Oil does and they are in bed with Trudeau. follow the money.

          The poster child for Liberals. So yes you are right.

          All they have to do is charge Irvine a tax comparable to what Alberta oil is worth.

          So for what it's worth they are 10 and Alberta is 4 as an example tax is 6. Let's see how long they squirm.

          **** I hate Liberals at the trough.

          Follow the money to Irvine from Liberals.

          Round and round we go.

          Comment


            #29
            Originally posted by dmlfarmer View Post
            I have asked this question before but no one has ever answered it so I will try again.
            Could someone please show me where in Canada's accounts is the payments for Canada is buying Saudi Oil?

            Most here overlook that the 100,000 barrels a day of oil that is imported to Canada is not being paid for by Canada but by private refineries, mainly Irving Oil. You overlook the fact the problem and costs of moving oil to the east coast. And as we see now, you ignore the fact that the production costs of Canadian oil is higher than that of Saudi oil and they will always beat Canada in a oil price war. And that even if we have a pipeline, it is no guarantee that Irving would use WCS as it is more expensive both to produce and refine.

            So are all the self proclaimed "capitalists" on this site actually demanding that private industry should not be allowed to buy their inputs from who ever they choose? If you feel Canada should force all Canadian refineries to only use Canadian oil are you also in favor of government regulation forcing you to only buy your inputs, and equipment from Canadian suppliers regardless of supply or cost? And if you want the government to have the power to say what can be bought, expect they will also be empowered to limit who and what you can sell. And of course, as an agricultural exporter, I am sure our trading partners who we tell to screw off will be very receptive to buying our grain. Please, all socialists in favor of banning imports of oil, speak up!
            More than a few “trading partners” told Canada to screw off after Skippy and crew ran around virtue signaling from the first month they got elected .... Saudi being one of them
            Check barley sales to Saudi before and after their virtue signaling tour ..

            Comment


              #30
              Originally posted by dmlfarmer View Post
              I have asked this question before but no one has ever answered it so I will try again.
              Could someone please show me where in Canada's accounts is the payments for Canada is buying Saudi Oil?

              Most here overlook that the 100,000 barrels a day of oil that is imported to Canada is not being paid for by Canada but by private refineries, mainly Irving Oil. You overlook the fact the problem and costs of moving oil to the east coast. And as we see now, you ignore the fact that the production costs of Canadian oil is higher than that of Saudi oil and they will always beat Canada in a oil price war. And that even if we have a pipeline, it is no guarantee that Irving would use WCS as it is more expensive both to produce and refine.

              So are all the self proclaimed "capitalists" on this site actually demanding that private industry should not be allowed to buy their inputs from who ever they choose? If you feel Canada should force all Canadian refineries to only use Canadian oil are you also in favor of government regulation forcing you to only buy your inputs, and equipment from Canadian suppliers regardless of supply or cost? And if you want the government to have the power to say what can be bought, expect they will also be empowered to limit who and what you can sell. And of course, as an agricultural exporter, I am sure our trading partners who we tell to screw off will be very receptive to buying our grain. Please, all socialists in favor of banning imports of oil, speak up!
              Surely to christ you have heard of a tarriff ? For the good of our country?
              Last edited by Guest; Apr 1, 2020, 16:12.

              Comment


                #31
                Irving oil was importing Saudi oil while Harper was prime minister too.

                The US shale revolution and increasing production are at the heart of the problem for WCS. We put all our eggs in one basket in one market and over produced the infrastructure needed to carry Alberta oil to US markets. Once line 3 and KXL are running we will be in better shape except The Saudis want to put us out of business. A pandemic at the same time is really killing demand.

                There is no easy way out of this unless you want government to decide to build pipelines and more refineries in eastern Canada to use Alberta oil instead of imports. Because the oil companies aren’t That interested.

                Comment


                  #32
                  Originally posted by dmlfarmer View Post
                  I have asked this question before but no one has ever answered it so I will try again.
                  Could someone please show me where in Canada's accounts is the payments for Canada is buying Saudi Oil?

                  Most here overlook that the 100,000 barrels a day of oil that is imported to Canada is not being paid for by Canada but by private refineries, mainly Irving Oil. You overlook the fact the problem and costs of moving oil to the east coast. And as we see now, you ignore the fact that the production costs of Canadian oil is higher than that of Saudi oil and they will always beat Canada in a oil price war. And that even if we have a pipeline, it is no guarantee that Irving would use WCS as it is more expensive both to produce and refine.

                  So are all the self proclaimed "capitalists" on this site actually demanding that private industry should not be allowed to buy their inputs from who ever they choose? If you feel Canada should force all Canadian refineries to only use Canadian oil are you also in favor of government regulation forcing you to only buy your inputs, and equipment from Canadian suppliers regardless of supply or cost? And if you want the government to have the power to say what can be bought, expect they will also be empowered to limit who and what you can sell. And of course, as an agricultural exporter, I am sure our trading partners who we tell to screw off will be very receptive to buying our grain. Please, all socialists in favor of banning imports of oil, speak up!

                  Irvings are one of the biggest corporate welfare cases in Canada, may as well be a kebec company.

                  Comment


                    #33
                    Originally posted by caseih View Post
                    Surely to christ you have heard of a tarriff ? For the good of our country?
                    You mean like India placed on our pulses which everyone here hates. So okay if we do it but not if the countries we export to

                    And of course you are fine with higher prices for fuel because tariffs increase prices for the buyer of goods. Carbon tax bad but higher cost of goods because government is taxing importers good. Yeah makes a lot of sense

                    Comment


                      #34
                      Not sure what happened in 2018. Fell off a cliff!
                      https://comtrade.un.org/data/ https://comtrade.un.org/data/
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Untitled-1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	13.2 KB
ID:	769561

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...