Originally posted by chuckChuck
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Heads up in oil patch.
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Originally posted by Hamloc View PostSo I am curious Chuck, do you have a reading comprehension problem or in typical Liberal fashion are you refusing to actually address the questions I asked?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hamloc View PostSo I am curious Chuck, do you have a reading comprehension problem or in typical Liberal fashion are you refusing to actually address the questions I asked?
Some were exceptional and answered directly to the question asked of them.
I don't think the current PM has ever answered a question with a direct answer.
When he got into trouble with the firing of Jodie Wilson Raybould, his answer was extremely repetitive and deflective during question period, coach Butts probably rewarded him accordingly.
Three pocket Justin has the CBC, CTV, and the RCMP in his pockets so he doesn't even have to answer the really tough questions that should be asked of him on a daily basis.
It should be against the law for any government involvement in media, you can see Justin's chicom envy showing through by avoiding question period and the house of commons which can be enterpreted as a very one party only regime.
It's only a matter of time before he starts wearing the Mao black tunic suit.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TASFarms View PostLook at raging river resources. Their stock was over $12 a couple years ago. Funds pulled out and went states side. Now they are well under 50 cents . The loss in this country is mind boggling
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hamloc View PostSimple question for you Chuck, would you be happy with a 25% sales tax? Do you believe more people employed by the government as opposed to private industry is diversification?
And who is suggesting more civil servants when a sizable heritage fund and sensible tax policies could have been used to help diversify and stabilize Alberta's economy to reduce the impact of low oil prices.
If you want to be taken seriously ask reasonable questions and don't exaggerate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostWhen is Alberta going to make plans for diversifying their economy? How many times do we need to go through this cycle of boom and bust before industry and governments start investing in developing a resilient economy that is not so dependent on one or 2 export dependent commodities?
Perhaps they should ask Norway for advice?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hamloc View PostOk so you think my questions were exaggerated? First you said we need to diversify our economy and perhaps we should ask Norway for advice. So when I looked at Norway's for any information on what Norway was doing business wise lately I found they were working on a new gas pipeline to Poland, installing carbon capture technology on a large cement plant. It looks similar to Canada. One large difference would be government certainly spends far more per capita than Canada with their cradle to grave social programs, hence why I asked if you considered increasing the size of government to be diversification. Personally I believe Alberta should have a sales tax, and I believe all energy royalties should go into savings so that the revenue earned from those savings can be used by future generations but if you want to use Norway as the example to follow you should be ready to accept their levels of taxation or quit using them as the model to follow.
And yes, Norway is one of the most heavily taxed countries in the world with a total tax burden of roughly 45% of GDP– almost 4x Hong Kong and nearly twice the US.
VAT here is a whopping 25%. Personal income tax rates border 55%. Corporate profits tax ranges from 28% to as high as 78%. Norway even has a direct WEALTH TAX.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hamloc View PostOk so you think my questions were exaggerated? First you said we need to diversify our economy and perhaps we should ask Norway for advice. So when I looked at Norway's for any information on what Norway was doing business wise lately I found they were working on a new gas pipeline to Poland, installing carbon capture technology on a large cement plant. It looks similar to Canada. One large difference would be government certainly spends far more per capita than Canada with their cradle to grave social programs, hence why I asked if you considered increasing the size of government to be diversification. Personally I believe Alberta should have a sales tax, and I believe all energy royalties should go into savings so that the revenue earned from those savings can be used by future generations but if you want to use Norway as the example to follow you should be ready to accept their levels of taxation or quit using them as the model to follow.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostWe are in some agreement. Even with Sask. tax rates Alberta would have been much farther ahead and probably could have saved a lot more for a rainy day. I am not advocating Norway tax rates. But Sask tax rates would be a great start. Higher royalties, a large heritage fund and Albertans would have still had many advantages over the rest of Canada.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment