CO2 levels too low?

[FarmJunkie]

Who pays the scientific organizations? Christ sakes

[chuckChuck]

I've never been able to authenticate that 97% survey.

Can you post that up for us Chuck?

It's referenced in millions of articles but I have never seen a link.

NASA has the sources of the consensus here:
https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/17/do-scientists-agree-on-climate-change/ https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/17/do-scientists-agree-on-climate-change/

[chuckChuck]

Now you are back to global warming, what happened to climate change? I think you are a few catch phrases behind the cool kids.
Because the definition makes all the difference. There is undeniable evidence of human caused climate change on many scales, and by many measures and definitions, thanks to planting crops, deforestation, urbanization, pollution/particulates in the air, dams, irrigation, desertification, etc etc. Whereas global warming is a very specific and definable metric. Could you please be more consistent and confirm which you want to prove? Because if you are willing to narrow it down to just warming, rather than the meaningless catch-all of climate change then it becomes a much easier job.

Edit, good to see you got the LMAO after a statement that wasn't the slightest bit funny, you had me concerned that you had lost your sense of humor when you forgot it in the last post. Now you just need to discuss you belief system to make it complete.

I corrected my mistake so are you happy now? Lol

Climate change is the correct term because not only is warming happening on a global scale, disruptions to weather patterns and increased numbers of extreme weather events are likely the result of changes to the jet streams and other climate systems.

Not every part of the world is warming at the same rate.

And within climate change some regions can experience average or below average temperatures. Variability of weather still exists on a seasonal and annual basis. But long term trends don't lie.

You really should provide evidence from a recognized scientific organization that global cooling or no change is occurring. Surely if cooling actually exists a large number of scientists would be publishing studies with supporting data. Where are they?

That's why I keep asking for evidence from a recognized and credible scientific organization that human caused climate change is not occurring.

All I get in response is the usual denials, insults, attacks, change the subject, conspiracy theories, political theories, allegations of fraud, scams and run arounds.

Show us the evidence by providing a credible scientific organization that says human caused climate change is not occurring.

The obvious reason you don't is you cant find one! You have had many months running into years to provide an organization. Give up!

[chuckChuck]

Who pays the scientific organizations? Christ sakes

Trump and the US Federal Government fund NASA and NOAA. So they must be biased! LOL

[rumrocks]

Chuck, any suggestions on how we fix the global climate change.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I corrected my mistake so are you happy now? Lol

Just glad I could help. Making a not so minor transgression as that could easily have cost you your job, And then who would we have to make fun of.

Just think, if you hadn't have caught that mistake, You would have been left with a falsifiable hypothesis, Well-defined, quantifiable and measurable on a reasonable timeframe, Then even a dumb farmer could easily have discredited wiith data. Now you are back in your safe zone with a meaningless all encompassing term that includes everything formerly known as weather , Therefore can never be falsified, Like any real scientific theory could be.

This mistake is even more serious than that time I cornered you into conceding that sea level rise Show no acceleration, That you have no clue what percentage of sea level rise could be human caused. Fortunately DML came just in time to save you that time, He appears to have abandoned you to your own incompetent devices now.

And don't forget that you have forfeited the right to use The jet stream is changing weather patterns argument, When you declined my offer of help to prove your theory last winter under the pretext that us dumb farmers just aren't smart enough to read weather records.

[rumrocks]

Just glad I could help. Making a not so minor transgression as that could easily have cost you your job, And then who would we have to make fun of.

Just think, if you hadn't have caught that mistake, You would have been left with a falsifiable hypothesis, Well-defined, quantifiable and measurable on a reasonable timeframe, Then even a dumb farmer could easily have discredited wiith data. Now you are back in your safe zone with a meaningless all encompassing term that includes everything formerly known as weather , Therefore can never be falsified, Like any real scientific theory could be.

This mistake is even more serious than that time I cornered you into conceding that sea level rise Show no acceleration, That you have no clue what percentage of sea level rise could be human caused. Fortunately DML came just in time to save you that time, He appears to have abandoned you to your own incompetent devices now.

And don't forget that you have forfeited the right to use The jet stream is changing weather patterns argument, When you declined my offer of help to prove your theory last winter under the pretext that us dumb farmers just aren't smart enough to read weather records.

Good point, when you bet on weather changing/no change, that's money in the bank every time.

[Misterjade9]

I am so sorry I made the crack about crayons up the Liberal noses, look at where it has got this thread.

[LEP]

Tried the heavy breathing thing last night. Didn’t seem to budge it. But what can you expect after only 3 minutes I guess.

If don't first succeed , try try again.

[farmaholic]

Tried the heavy breathing thing last night. Didn’t seem to budge it. But what can you expect after only 3 minutes I guess.

You might have to get more people involved and make it a group effort.