You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Yup cops bad ...
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
Fortunately in the internet era, the government/church/elite no longer have a monopoly on information dissemination. Too bad some woke people refuse to use this miraculous technology to verify.
Yup let’s burn the country down over harsh treatment criminals who do atrocities then celebrate them as hero’s .
Nice society we are building.
Why was that not put out there on msm ??
Did you come to this conclusion based on the picture and discription that you shared without validating it? As it turned out that picture is not even someone living in US. It is a picture of a lady from Madrid who was the victim of a violent **** inSpain. Nothing to do with Floyd. And the attached report is a complete exaggeration compared to police report. Also, Floyd has not been in trouble with police for over 10 years. But I guess you believe people can not change so hope no one on here has never been in trouble or seldom seen will call you a filthy animal and post fake pictures of you
Fortunately in the internet era, the government/church/elite no longer have a monopoly on information dissemination. Too bad some woke people refuse to use this miraculous technology to verify.
Too bad posters here don’t validate things before sharing too
Too bad posters here don’t validate things before sharing too
Yes, it works on both sides. The supposed picture of Floyds victim is incorrect, although the story is mostly factual. Just because some twit on the internet attached the wrong picture as clickbait, doesn't make the crime any less heinous, or the perpetrator any better person.
I previously checked Snopes about Aunt Jemima. A lot o unknowns, and suppositions on their part, not sure that the entire truth is even knowable at this point. A previous lawsuit was thrown out because the supposed family couldn't even prove they were related. Mostly a political football at this point, with a pointless he said she said arguement about someone who has been gone for almost 100 years, so probably isn't too concerned.
Yup let’s burn the country down over harsh treatment criminals who do atrocities then celebrate them as hero’s .
Nice society we are building.
Why was that not put out there on msm ??
Because it is not true so says more about people sharing and liking shares of such garbage than of of msm
Like the garbage of pushing Jessie Smollette fake news , the Kid at the Washington rally last Year who most major msm tried desperately to push the race card , and lost huge with lawsuits?
Or the fake hijab cutting in Montreal that our own PM jumped on instantly and the Canadian press as well only to be called out a hoax
Again , you too can get off your high horse
There is two sides to every story , and only one getting pushed ... you can not deny that .
Yes there is b/s from all sides . But it’s the one getting forced that is vastly one sided .
Also agree the base of that story is true , Floyd was no angel at all . No justification for what happened at all , but the whole story needs to be shown . Otherwise we are heading for a dictatorship style society where all info is run through the narrative of the government and msm. That’s not democracy...
The thug in the video should be charged with attempted murder for punching a female police officer that many times and with that much force. As far as George Floyd goes he was a career criminal, been found guilty of 9 serious crimes INCLUDING ROBBERY OF A FEMALE IN HER HOME AT GUNPOINT.
The supposed picture of Floyds victim is incorrect, although the story is mostly factual.
Furrowtickler posted: "Also agree the base of that story is true".
you guys are too funny. You get all defensive when I call a poster for sharing a fake picture/post intended to inflame anger against Floyd. And your response is that most of the story though is true. Really? Did you check or just spew that out in defense too? I want to point out (besides a picture that is not of the victim, but that implies that it is): 1. there was no kidnapping, as the post claims. 2. She was not brutally beaten by George Floyd, she was hit but by someone else while Floyd was searching the home for drugs. 3. Floyd charged with aggravated robbery, not assault or kidnapping. 4. There is no evidence pointing to the victim being pregnant or that Floyd threatened to kill the baby(???) The only factual information in the post was that Floyd was part of an armed home invasion seeking drugs. All the rest was exaggeration. Here are the court documents presenting the case. https://www.snopes.com/tachyon/2020/06/Screen-Shot-2020-06-11-at-2.46.27-PM.png
Nor does this story point out that the last time he was charged with a crime was back in 2007.
Just wondering how far you think it is okay to spin a story and still consider it basically true or mostly factual?
This website uses tracking tools, including cookies. We use these technologies for a variety of reasons, including to recognize new and past website users, to customize your experience, perform analytics and deliver personalized advertising on our sites, apps and newsletters and across the Internet based on your interests.
You agree to our and by clicking I agree.
Comment