PM's mother Margaret and brother Alexandre were both paid to speak at WE Charity

[Taiga]

This is a pretty good article:
https://m.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/we-charity-volunteer-white-saviour_ca_5f0e0652c5b648c301f07314

[ajl]

I would define it as anyone who thinks a federal party should run on a social conservative platform in the year 2020. You are welcome to hold whatever views you like, but stop ruining the chances of a potentially fiscal conservative government by associating them with social views inconsistent with most Canadians in 2020. And stop giving the leftwing media ammunition to use against fiscal conservatives. We have an economic crisis to solve. The social issues won't matter if the country collapses economically. Put the greater good ahead of your personal beliefs, or else we will be stuck with Trudeau or worse forever.

The real problem conservative have is that socially liberal and fiscally conservative can't coexist. That is mixed messaging. We need to pivot from pro death to pro life and pro family if you really want to fix some problems. To revive the economy we need to fire about 1/3 of the civil disservice. This would have the effect of increasing family size and allow us to reduce immigration significantly. The lieberals have been pedaling the lie that you can replace families with immigration. Can't and wont happen. You will not fix the economic and political malaise that we find ourselves in without doing the above.

[dmlfarmer]

T

I am fascinated by your post. Could you please explain your logic behind your claim "To revive the economy we need to fire about 1/3 of the civil disservice. This would have the effect of increasing family size and allow us to reduce immigration significantly." What is the correlation between family size and the size of the civil service? I do not know of a single family that made the decision as to family size based on number of government employees. They make the choice based on lifestyle they want, cost of living (which includes taxes) and opportunities they see for their children. If cost of living including taxes were as oppressive as some suggest, why would immigrants (who tend to have larger families) even want to immigrate here? And what is wrong with immigrants? Other than the first nations we are all offspring of immigrants. Today's immigrants either work in jobs that are not seen as opportunities by Canadian citizens or come highly skilled, such as doctors and nurses.

And if you get a chance, maybe tell us what 1/3 of the civil service should be fired? What government departments do you feel are not needed?

[Sheepwheat]

First Nations ppl are offspring of immigrants too.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

First Nations ppl are offspring of immigrants too.

Yes, I can't understand why Anyone on either side of the debate would want to open that Pandora's box.
Just look at the scandal surrounding the Kennewick Man. Probably never will learn the whole truth around that.
There is increasing evidence that they came over multiple waves.
The distribution of the various tribes certainly wasn't static throughout history, With war and genocide slavery and the equivalent of colonization.
There is there is the coincidental disappearance of many species of large land mammals shortly after their arrival.

[dmlfarmer]

Point taken. Very poor wording on my part. You are right, everyone living in NA immigrated from somewhere. So if we do not question the right of First Nations to live here, or for European immigrants to live here, or anyone else whose parents or previous generations come to NA, what right to we have to question today's immigrants legally applying and moving here. Why is families of present citizens having more children preferable than having immigration - especially if parents do not want bigger families?

But this is a distraction from what I am really interested in learning, and that is how getting rid of 1/3 of the civil service will result in larger families?

[furrowtickler]

I am fascinated by your post. Could you please explain your logic behind your claim "To revive the economy we need to fire about 1/3 of the civil disservice. This would have the effect of increasing family size and allow us to reduce immigration significantly." What is the correlation between family size and the size of the civil service? I do not know of a single family that made the decision as to family size based on number of government employees. They make the choice based on lifestyle they want, cost of living (which includes taxes) and opportunities they see for their children. If cost of living including taxes were as oppressive as some suggest, why would immigrants (who tend to have larger families) even want to immigrate here? And what is wrong with immigrants? Other than the first nations we are all offspring of immigrants. Today's immigrants either work in jobs that are not seen as opportunities by Canadian citizens or come highly skilled, such as doctors and nurses.

And if you get a chance, maybe tell us what 1/3 of the civil service should be fired? What government departments do you feel are not needed?

Cause civil servants do not create wealth they only drain wealth .
This country desperately needs wealth creation...... now

[ajl]

I am fascinated by your post. Could you please explain your logic behind your claim "To revive the economy we need to fire about 1/3 of the civil disservice. This would have the effect of increasing family size and allow us to reduce immigration significantly." What is the correlation between family size and the size of the civil service? I do not know of a single family that made the decision as to family size based on number of government employees. They make the choice based on lifestyle they want, cost of living (which includes taxes) and opportunities they see for their children. If cost of living including taxes were as oppressive as some suggest, why would immigrants (who tend to have larger families) even want to immigrate here? And what is wrong with immigrants? Other than the first nations we are all offspring of immigrants. Today's immigrants either work in jobs that are not seen as opportunities by Canadian citizens or come highly skilled, such as doctors and nurses.

And if you get a chance, maybe tell us what 1/3 of the civil service should be fired? What government departments do you feel are not needed?

I would start with closing the office of climate change and work from there. The larger issue is why is the government so large and growing all the time. One of the answers to that is to create career opportunities for women. There is your connection between the civil disservice and family size. The main problem with immigration today is today's welfare immigrant is not the same as those who came in the 50's and 60's. We would still have immigration depending on labor market needs and only that.

[macdon02]

I would start with closing the office of climate change and work from there. The larger issue is why is the government so large and growing all the time. One of the answers to that is to create career opportunities for women. There is your connection between the civil disservice and family size. The main problem with immigration today is today's welfare immigrant is not the same as those who came in the 50's and 60's. We would still have immigration depending on labor market needs and only that.

Screw it, let it burn. Once the crash happens like Rome, then a true reset can happen. A conservative win next election will only have more bat shit crazy lefties out denouncing fascists, while they impose their ideas on everyone else, or risk being called a racist, fascist, sexist, capitalist, etc. Etc.. this is a Dunkirk moment, you gotta know when to cut and run. If you can't see the flames in the cities from 20 miles away, it hasn't cooked enough yet. They need this GOOD AND HARD.

[farmaholic]

Remind me again, we are where?

[helmsdale]

Screw it, let it burn. Once the crash happens like Rome, then a true reset can happen. A conservative win next election will only have more bat shit crazy lefties out denouncing fascists, while they impose their ideas on everyone else, or risk being called a racist, fascist, sexist, capitalist, etc. Etc.. this is a Dunkirk moment, you gotta know when to cut and run. If you can't see the flames in the cities from 20 miles away, it hasn't cooked enough yet. They need this GOOD AND HARD.

THIS!!!

It is NOT the time for conservatives right now. The mob isn't even the slightest bit interested. Anyone to the right of Mao, or Stalin is "literally a fascist." We are clearly at the stage where weak men are making hard times. You will get ZERO traction telling them to buck up!

When the mob finally becomes concerned about:
-where they'll find a job in the "new normal,"
-how they'll afford a friggin roof over their head,
-how they'll put FOOD ON THEIR PLATE,
-having children, so that:
-they can once again be concerned about planning for someone elses future rather than their own,
-they can get reacquainted with sacrifice for the future,
-god forbid they think about anything other than their own feeble existence
-etc...

rather than:
-what gender pronoun they'd prefer enforced on others when referring to their delicate sensibilities,
-whether they feel sufficiently guilty for the sins of their great great great great grandparents, or even the empires of the ancient world.
-whether the state will force whomever they desire to bake them a god forsaken cake for their celebration of choice.
-whether the world is going to cease to exist in 5, 10, or 15 years from human causes,
-(insert cause de jour)

Then, and ONLY then, will their once again be fertile ground for conservative ideas.

[Guest]

[ATTACH]6432[/ATTACH]

Remind me again, we are where?

about to reboot , thats where we are