“Rex Murphy: The folly of green economics“

[Hamloc]

More Jazz logic? Or should I say lack of logic? LOL

So increased temperatures and longer droughts have nothing to do with the intensity and severity of fires?

Regardless of who or what starts fires, climate change has an impact and the science clearly says this.

Interesting article on CBC Saskatchewan on how 20 locations broke low temperature records. Looking through there were some records that had stood since 1910, so in your world Chuck2 is this a trend or just a weather event? I am also interested you have many times told us how we will have more frost free days to grow crops, it certainly doesn’t appear that way to me!

[furrowtickler]

California is getting a preview of what climate change does to the length and intensity of the fire season.

At the peak of electrical demand because of scorching temperatures, they are losing generation sources and distribution infrastructure to wild fires.

Preview , or repeat ???? ......


Dam fossil fuels back then , gosh darn near 700 year drought

[furrowtickler]

Must have been this generation to blame ...


Have to blame someone, can’t be just a natural phenomenon

[chuckChuck]

Interesting article on CBC Saskatchewan on how 20 locations broke low temperature records. Looking through there were some records that had stood since 1910, so in your world Chuck2 is this a trend or just a weather event? I am also interested you have many times told us how we will have more frost free days to grow crops, it certainly doesn’t appear that way to me!

That’s the flat earthers scientific method. The earth looks flat right? To actually know what the trend is you need to look at the temperature and seasonal data for the last 30 - 100 years at numerous locations across the prairies. Opinion and recollection from your backyard are not considered evidence for or against. Let us know what you find out!

[Guest]

That’s the flat earthers scientific method. The earth looks flat right? To actually know what the trend is you need to look at the temperature and seasonal data for the last 30 - 100 years at numerous locations across the prairies. Opinion and recollection from your backyard are not considered evidence for or against. Let us know what you find out!

first fu-ken thing you gotta do is get rid of all the thermometers that are on black pavement in all the cities
start there FFS

[furrowtickler]

That’s the flat earthers scientific method. The earth looks flat right? To actually know what the trend is you need to look at the temperature and seasonal data for the last 30 - 100 years at numerous locations across the prairies. Opinion and recollection from your backyard are not considered evidence for or against. Let us know what you find out!

A people wonder why you get picked on .. lol

And the CWB had 80% support eh lol

[AlbertaFarmer5]

A people wonder why you get picked on .. lol

And the CWB had 80% support eh lol

Just think, if Chuck made the same claim today with all of the tricks he has learned from the climate change industry, he would be able to claim a full 97% consensus.

[chuckChuck]

Case and furrow do you really think black pavement near weather stations is an issue in Canada's arctic where average temperatures have risen more dramatically than the rest of Canada? I don't think so!

Here is a link to how global temperatures are calculated and how the data is collected.

https://granthaminstitute.com/2015/10/16/taking-the-planets-temperature-how-are-global-temperatures-calculated/ https://granthaminstitute.com/2015/10/16/taking-the-planets-temperature-how-are-global-temperatures-calculated/

[Hamloc]

That’s the flat earthers scientific method. The earth looks flat right? To actually know what the trend is you need to look at the temperature and seasonal data for the last 30 - 100 years at numerous locations across the prairies. Opinion and recollection from your backyard are not considered evidence for or against. Let us know what you find out!

“Opinion and recollection from my backyard”, make me laugh. First off out of the previous five harvests four I have had early snow and cold, that is not an opinion, that is fact. Secondly why is a record warm temperature in Greenland news and an indication of global warming but many record cold temperatures in Saskatchewan mean nothing?! No consistency in your outlook!! One other difference I don’t constantly call you names or insult your intelligence, why do climate change supporters always do that, do you think that helps?!

[chuckChuck]

Hamloc take a look at NOAA's temperature anomaly map for 2019. Can you see that NOAA captured the lower than normal temperatures in much of central north america in 2019?

Now look at that the rest of the world. What do you see? We can see that a large majority of the world had temperatures above normal! Correct?

Why would you equate what happened in central north america in 2019 with representing what happened in the rest of the world?

Nobody is ignoring the cooler than normal year in central north america. But are you trying to tell us that because you have had cooler than normal conditions in your part of the world that somehow human caused climate change is not causing increasing temperatures on a global scale?

Because if you are, you are using the flat earther scientific method.

Hamloc, the world is a big place. What happens in your small part of the world does not represent the rest of the world whether measured over 1 year, 10 years, 30 years, or several hundred years.

[jazz]

Hamloc, the world is a big place. What happens in your small part of the world does not represent the rest of the world whether measured over 1 year, 10 years, 30 years, or several hundred years.

How about a thousand yrs, or 10 thousand yrs or a million years, or 10 million or a billion?

Funny how climate radicals always chop down the time scale to their lifetime.

How did the dinosaurs release all that carbon 100M years ago? Can you show us a NOAA chart from 500 yrs ago?

[chuckChuck]