• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

“Rex Murphy: The folly of green economics“

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
    A people wonder why you get picked on .. lol

    And the CWB had 80% support eh lol
    Just think, if Chuck made the same claim today with all of the tricks he has learned from the climate change industry, he would be able to claim a full 97% consensus.
    Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Sep 9, 2020, 18:29.

    Comment


      #32
      Case and furrow do you really think black pavement near weather stations is an issue in Canada's arctic where average temperatures have risen more dramatically than the rest of Canada? I don't think so!

      Here is a link to how global temperatures are calculated and how the data is collected.

      https://granthaminstitute.com/2015/10/16/taking-the-planets-temperature-how-are-global-temperatures-calculated/ https://granthaminstitute.com/2015/10/16/taking-the-planets-temperature-how-are-global-temperatures-calculated/

      Click image for larger version

Name:	arctic-temperature-increase.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	19.5 KB
ID:	770100
      Last edited by chuckChuck; Sep 10, 2020, 07:20.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
        That’s the flat earthers scientific method. The earth looks flat right? To actually know what the trend is you need to look at the temperature and seasonal data for the last 30 - 100 years at numerous locations across the prairies. Opinion and recollection from your backyard are not considered evidence for or against. Let us know what you find out!
        “Opinion and recollection from my backyard”, make me laugh. First off out of the previous five harvests four I have had early snow and cold, that is not an opinion, that is fact. Secondly why is a record warm temperature in Greenland news and an indication of global warming but many record cold temperatures in Saskatchewan mean nothing?! No consistency in your outlook!! One other difference I don’t constantly call you names or insult your intelligence, why do climate change supporters always do that, do you think that helps?!

        Comment


          #34
          Hamloc take a look at NOAA's temperature anomaly map for 2019. Can you see that NOAA captured the lower than normal temperatures in much of central north america in 2019?

          Now look at that the rest of the world. What do you see? We can see that a large majority of the world had temperatures above normal! Correct?

          Why would you equate what happened in central north america in 2019 with representing what happened in the rest of the world?

          Nobody is ignoring the cooler than normal year in central north america. But are you trying to tell us that because you have had cooler than normal conditions in your part of the world that somehow human caused climate change is not causing increasing temperatures on a global scale?

          Because if you are, you are using the flat earther scientific method.

          Hamloc, the world is a big place. What happens in your small part of the world does not represent the rest of the world whether measured over 1 year, 10 years, 30 years, or several hundred years.

          Click image for larger version

Name:	map-blended-mntp-201901-201912.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	19.7 KB
ID:	770105

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
            Hamloc, the world is a big place. What happens in your small part of the world does not represent the rest of the world whether measured over 1 year, 10 years, 30 years, or several hundred years.
            How about a thousand yrs, or 10 thousand yrs or a million years, or 10 million or a billion?

            Funny how climate radicals always chop down the time scale to their lifetime.

            How did the dinosaurs release all that carbon 100M years ago? Can you show us a NOAA chart from 500 yrs ago?

            Comment


              #36
              Click image for larger version

Name:	map-blended-mntp-201601-201612.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	19.5 KB
ID:	770107
              Click image for larger version

Name:	map-blended-mntp-201701-201712.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	19.9 KB
ID:	770108
              Click image for larger version

Name:	map-blended-mntp-201801-201812.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	19.8 KB
ID:	770109

              Comment


                #37
                Jazz quote "Funny how climate radicals always chop down the time scale to their lifetime."


                Jazz did you miss this graphic from NASA (a climate radical organization....) that covers the last 800,000 years of CO2 levels?

                Like a lot of posts you seem to be short on observation and logic! LOL

                Click image for larger version

Name:	BAMS_SOTC_2019_co2_paleo_1000px.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	86.2 KB
ID:	770110


                Carbon dioxide concentrations are rising mostly because of the fossil fuels that people are burning for energy. Fossil fuels like coal and oil contain carbon that plants pulled out of the atmosphere through photosynthesis over the span of many millions of years; we are returning that carbon to the atmosphere in just a few hundred years. According to State of the Climate in 2019 from NOAA and the American Meteorological Society,

                In fact, the last time the atmospheric CO2 amounts were this high was more than 3 million years ago, when temperature was 2°–3°C (3.6°–5.4°F) higher than during the pre-industrial era, and sea level was 15–25 meters (50–80 feet) higher than today.
                Last edited by chuckChuck; Sep 11, 2020, 07:45.

                Comment

                • Reply to this Thread
                • Return to Topic List
                Working...