• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

6%

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ry0972
    replied
    Also released late last week is the TOTAL year to date death #'s for the USA and broken down by state.
    2020 is running BEHIND the totals to date for the last 4 years!!!

    The CDC WHO any many state coroners offices are now quietly releasing data that shows the Kung-Flu is far less deadly that a normal cold and flu season to 90% of the population.
    And finally doctors that were saying from the beginning that the elderly and high risk do to severe health issues should protect themselves and the rest of population go about life as normal with extra hand washing and sanitizing.
    Since the population that is around 16 years old and under have near 0% chance to get OR EVEN SPREAD the virus.
    Also MANY studies coming out PROVING without doubt that the Hydroxy/zinc/anthro ****tail if given early has a 98% cure rate with no side effects.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Deathsthru8-24-20(full).jpg
Views:	1
Size:	91.1 KB
ID:	770062

    Leave a comment:


  • AlbertaFarmer5
    replied
    Originally posted by tweety View Post
    They are not wrong furrow, it's just taken out of context and a conspiracy created from it, as usual. Gawd i hate social media.
    Can you explain the context of the CDC report that is being taken wrong?

    Leave a comment:


  • furrowtickler
    replied
    Originally posted by tweety View Post
    They are not wrong furrow, it's just taken out of context and a conspiracy created from it, as usual. Gawd i hate social media.
    What’s the conspiracy?
    Just askin

    Leave a comment:


  • tweety
    replied
    Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
    So is the CDC wrong ? Yes or no ?
    Just askin
    They are not wrong furrow, it's just taken out of context and a conspiracy created from it, as usual. Gawd i hate social media.

    Leave a comment:


  • jazz
    replied
    Originally posted by agstar77 View Post
    Even if you ignore the death rate , what is the cost to society of extra care for those infected .
    Caring for our elderly and at risk populations is a different conversation that should have happened long ago. Maybe it will now.

    The cdc numbers clearly show that its the at risk population that should be quarantined and masked up, not the general population.

    And yes a discussion on personal health, nutrition and fitness is long over due as well. The American population especially because obesity and inactivity is a major problem there.

    Leave a comment:


  • tweety
    replied
    Once again, and again, and again. People, critical thinking, please start sometime soon. A baseless conspiracy posted and look at all the immediate doopsters believing it.

    "
    Of note: Twitter removed a post earlier Sunday retweeted by President Trump for violating its rules with a false interpretation of the CDC's novel coronavirus data.

    The post incorrectly claimed the CDC had "quietly" updated its data "to admit that only 6%" of those listed in the U.S. coronavirus death toll "actually died from COVID" and that "the other 94% had 2-3 other serious illnesses," CNN notes.
    The post by a supporter of a baseless conspiracy theory has since been deleted.
    "

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2020/08/31/twitter-removes-claim-about-cdc-and-covid-19-coronavirus-deaths-that-trump-retweeted/#8312fbc31787 https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2020/08/31/twitter-removes-claim-about-cdc-and-covid-19-coronavirus-deaths-that-trump-retweeted/#8312fbc31787

    https://www.axios.com/cdc-covid-deaths-contributing-health-conditions-3315196c-986f-4ae3-ba35-2075fd64bce1.html https://www.axios.com/cdc-covid-deaths-contributing-health-conditions-3315196c-986f-4ae3-ba35-2075fd64bce1.html

    Leave a comment:


  • agstar77
    replied
    Even if you ignore the death rate , what is the cost to society of extra care for those infected .

    Leave a comment:


  • agstar77
    replied
    Just for fun get the virus and see if you suffer from the side effects the long haulers suffer from. Even people who recover may have lifelong problems, but who cares it is just the flu.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sheepwheat
    replied
    Originally posted by jazz View Post
    The report says that in the 94% that died, all of them had 2 or more comorbities. Many were probably obese and immobile as well. These werent healthy people who got dropped by a virus. Average age of death in these cases was well into late 70s early 80s which is beyond the average life expectancy of general population.
    So if one were to extrapolate these numbers for Saskatchewan, we have had a single one whopping death due to this overblown farce, correct?

    My wife found that report on Saturday evening.

    But thanks for throwing it up. It truly is unreal that Regina is voting today on mandatory masks, whether this report is in existence or not.

    Leave a comment:


  • jazz
    replied
    The report says that in the 94% that died, all of them had 2 or more comorbities. Many were probably obese and immobile as well. These werent healthy people who got dropped by a virus. Average age of death in these cases was well into late 70s early 80s which is beyond the average life expectancy of general population.

    Leave a comment:

  • Reply to this Thread
  • Return to Topic List
Working...