• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What will we do for Carbon , for life and plant growth?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
    If I remember correctly Tweety, aren't you an agronomist or similar? You have the education and common sense to understand this.

    First off, no need to use the Chuck tactic of distracting, trying to get off on a tangent about nutritional content. Any farmer can spot the fallacy in that. I believe we have addressed this before. By increasing yield by increasing the limiting nutrient, and not increasing all other nutrients in proportion, the plant will be starved for something else until we compensate for that. That is why wheat price increases based on protien, the market has this figured out already. By your logic, we shouldn't irrigate, shouldn't add CO2 to greenhouses, shouldn't fertilize etc.

    But that misses the point. The Omafra CO2 greenhouse article clearly indicates the yield declines as CO2 levels go lower. As indicated in the graph:


    Looks like a perfect logarithmic relationship, except it is shifted on the x axis, since photosynthesis stops long before CO2 reaches 0 ppm.
    Take the wheat yield benefits from the other link ( you happened to chose the lowest of all of them), plot them on that same curve, and extrapolate down below todays levels. Not much more benefit to be had up at these levels, but yield falls off a cliff going down below ~350 ppm
    Well it does, but at pre industrial levels it is about 95% and today about 103%. So this is the end of the world for food production? If you're not burning fossil fuels any longer, difficulty accessing nitrogen would be of a much bigger concern.

    Professional lobbyist actually But don't tell anyone.

    Comment


      A5, are you sure you are a farmer and not a fisher? Because you sure seem to come up with a lot of red herrings!

      Comment


        Click image for larger version

Name:	E591951B-20BD-4583-8C4D-CF23455F956E.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	8.2 KB
ID:	770122Click image for larger version

Name:	E591951B-20BD-4583-8C4D-CF23455F956E.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	8.2 KB
ID:	770122
        Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
        A5, are you sure you are a farmer and not a fisher? Because you sure seem to come up with a lot of red herrings!
        AF5, lol

        Comment


          Originally posted by tweety View Post
          Well it does, but at pre industrial levels it is about 95% and today about 103%. So this is the end of the world for food production? If you're not burning fossil fuels any longer, difficulty accessing nitrogen would be of a much bigger concern.

          Professional lobbyist actually But don't tell anyone.
          Actually, going back to the first page, accessing Sulphur is the biggest concern in a post fossil fuel world, N is easy, even intermittent unreliable renewable energy could pull N out of thin air whenever electricity supply exceeds demand, in fact it is a very good fit, since we have no way to cost effectively store the excess electricity, better to put it to use for a job task that doesn't have to fit any particular schedule.

          Using your very conservative figure of 8%, that means we need to find a way to become 8% more efficient, or add 8% more farmland worldwide. That only means adding 3 more Canada's worth of farmland. The greens and NIMBY's and save the rain forest types should be tickled pink about that outcome. Using the other extreme of those studies, and adding in the much higher benefits seen during drought ( and other) stress, and this is not an insignificant issue.

          Source: https://beef2live.com/story-countries-arable-land-world-0-108929 https://beef2live.com/story-countries-arable-land-world-0-108929
          Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Sep 14, 2020, 17:50.

          Comment


            Originally posted by tweety View Post

            Professional lobbyist actually But don't tell anyone.
            On whose side...

            Comment


              Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
              A5, are you sure you are a farmer and not a fisher? Because you sure seem to come up with a lot of red herrings!
              Chuck, I am so relieved that you were still able to make an intellectual contribution to this thread. I was worried that when we started using big words and technical terms that you might think it was above your pay grade and you would be too ashamed of your lack of knowledge and compehension of the issue, to have anything meaningful and relevant to add, and therefore refrain from embarassing yourself with further posts.

              And in this era of inclusiveness, it would have been a shame if you felt excluded from the conversation just because you didn't know anything about the subject. That should never be a reason to keep quiet, it is always better to open your mouth ( or your keyboard) and remove all doubt as they say. Why, just the other day, the guys were sitting around discussing hockey, or Curling, or some winter type sport, and I wanted to feel like I fit in, so I chimed in that I think Expo's will go all the way to the Super Bowl this year.

              But thanks to your post, and caseIH's research, I learned what a fisher is.
              Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Sep 14, 2020, 18:02.

              Comment


                We are still waiting for the science to support your red herring A5!

                I think its going to be a long wait. Maybe we will get it when hell freezes over?

                Without enough CO2 do you think hell would freeze over A5? LOL

                Comment


                  Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
                  On whose side...
                  The side of money. And the only way to do that is have the rules in your favor.

                  The red herring, that is pretty funny.

                  With the release of more CO2 comes the more violent weather extremes. Those losses are much higher then the issue of CO2. ppm
                  Last edited by tweety; Sep 15, 2020, 07:16.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by tweety View Post
                    The side of money. And the only way to do that is have the rules in your favor.

                    The red herring, that is pretty funny.

                    With the release of more CO2 comes the more violent weather extremes. Those losses are much higher then the issue of CO2. ppm
                    Can you provide some evidence of the violent weather extremes increasing. And the associated crop losses? Where are yields declining?

                    I hope you can do better than Chuck on this question, since he has failed completely to prove either in the past.

                    Why not respond to my previous post about yield loss due to declining CO2. Where do you propose we find 3 more Canada's to make up for the loss. Actually much more than 3, considering most of Canada's farm land is semi arid with only 1 ( or less) crop per year. Much lower yields than all of Europe, US, South America etc.

                    Comment


                      https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab154b/pdf https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab154b/pdf

                      The effects of climate extremes on global agricultural yields

                      Abstract
                      Climate extremes, such as droughts or heat waves, can lead to harvest failures and threaten thelivelihoods of agricultural producers and the food security of communities worldwide. Improving ourunderstanding of their impacts on crop yields is crucial to enhance the resilience of the global foodsystem. This study analyses, to our knowledge for thefirst time, the impacts of climate extremes onyield anomalies of maize, soybeans, rice and spring wheat at the global scale using sub-national yielddata and applying a machine-learning algorithm. Wefind that growing season climate factors—including mean climate as well as climate extremes—explain 20%–49% of the variance of yieldanomalies(the range describes the differences between crop types), with 18%–43% of the explainedvariance attributable to climate extremes, depending on crop type. Temperature-related extremesshow a stronger association with yield anomalies than precipitation-related factors, while irrigationpartly mitigates negative effects of high temperature extremes. We developed a composite indicator toidentify hotspot regions that are critical for global production and particularly susceptible to the effectsof climate extremes. These regions include North America for maize, spring wheat and soyproduction, Asia in the case of maize and rice production as well as Europe for spring wheatproduction. Our study highlights the importance of considering climate extremes for agriculturalpredictions and adaptation planning and provides an overview of critical regions that are mostsusceptible to variations in growing season climate and climate extremes.1. Introduction Different types of climate extremes are projected tointensify and become more frequent in a number of regions worldwide due to climate change(IPCC2012).Extreme events, such as droughts and heat waves, can adversely impact agricultural production and haveimplications for the livelihoods and food security ofcommunities. Not only regions immediately experien-cing the extreme event are affected, but also regions in other parts of the world, which may suffer from indirect consequences such as.....

                      Climate change is affecting crop yields and reducing global food supplies

                      https://theconversation.com/climate-change-is-affecting-crop-yields-and-reducing-global-food-supplies-118897 https://theconversation.com/climate-change-is-affecting-crop-yields-and-reducing-global-food-supplies-118897

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...