What will we do for Carbon , for life and plant growth?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

We do know, it won't go down. The carbon tax is an incentive to not compound the problem. At least in theory, or rather the hope. But the problem to date of CO2 levels will remain for a millennia or more.

Who is we, and how do we know it won't go down?
I've spent this entire thread trying to get an answer to this very question, it is fundamental to the entire CAGW argument, and to the models.

What is your credible source for the millenia or more? Chuck started the thread claiming thousands of years, but could find no evidence of that, one of his go to sources claims it could be as low as single digits, now after all the effort we put into it, you start over at the same place.

[TASFarms]

Just a Reminder. Carbon tax is a wealth transfer scam. Nothing more.

[burnt]

Just a Reminder. Carbon tax is a wealth transfer scam. Nothing more.

What is totally despicable is how (farm) organizations that are supposed to represent our interests are fully involved to the scam, using its language, working with its falsehoods, giving it another layer of false legitimacy.

[Guest]

Who is we, and how do we know it won't go down?
I've spent this entire thread trying to get an answer to this very question, it is fundamental to the entire CAGW argument, and to the models.

What is your credible source for the millenia or more? Chuck started the thread claiming thousands of years, but could find no evidence of that, one of his go to sources claims it could be as low as single digits, now after all the effort we put into it, you start over at the same place.

we is the cult and its Sheeple

[Oliver88]

i still wanna see your solar panels ?
went by yesterday , are they hidden , behind the bush maybe ? , guess i shoulda came in ?

Maybe there was a hail storm this year for Chuck? It appears greenies do their goose hunting slightly different as well.



This is how Ryan Meilli, NDP, NFU wanted to create all of our power and raise our rates!

[tweety]

Who is we, and how do we know it won't go down?

Everyone not on Agriville apparently. Because gases don't magically disappear.

You've been asking the whole thread how will we grow anything in a low C02 environment assuming it will drop dramatically, but even with the simplest basic understanding of gases you know that gases don't just disappear just because you stop adding them. Does the planet have a CO2 leak only you know about?

The effects of the last century of industrialization will last thousands of years in the oceans in the form of acidity and in the atmosphere as greenhouse gases.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Everyone not on Agriville apparently. Because gases don't magically disappear.

You've been asking the whole thread how will we grow anything in a low C02 environment assuming it will drop dramatically, but even with the simplest basic understanding of gases you know that gases don't just disappear just because you stop adding them. Does the planet have a CO2 leak only you know about?

The effects of the last century of industrialization will last thousands of years in the oceans in the form of acidity and in the atmosphere as greenhouse gases.

The leak is called sequestration. It is why limestone exists in gargantuan quantities.

Please provide a source for your claim. They run counter to all current scientific literature, even by the alarmists, even Chuck backed down from such a preposterous claim.

[tweety]

The leak is called sequestration. It is why limestone exists in gargantuan quantities.

Please provide a source for your claim. They run counter to all current scientific literature, even by the alarmists, even Chuck backed down from such a preposterous claim.

Over thousands of years. You really want to talk about the challenges of food production in a low CO2 environment thousands of years from now?

[chuckChuck]

A5 has no science to back up his opinions and gets distracted easily by irrelevant issues.

But don't let that stop you from bring up wacky theories and using the flat earth scientific method! LOL

Scott Moe and Saskpower are installing lots of wind power in Saskatchewan. 50% renewablse by 2030.

Oly, you better call them up and tell them they are killing all the geese that are eating your crop. Along with all the powerlines, vehicles and windows that kill many many many birds every year. No mention of those?

And large hail stones only hit solar panels! hahaaha If the hail stones are so big as the ones that caused the damage to the solar panels in the photo, your roof and windows, siding, vehicles will be done too. So should we stop using roofs too because of hail! LMAO

[Guest]

[ATTACH]6898[/ATTACH]
Maybe there was a hail storm this year for Chuck? It appears greenies do their goose hunting slightly different as well.

[ATTACH]6897[/ATTACH]

This is how Ryan Meilli, NDP, NFU wanted to create all of our power and raise our rates!

And half a million or so geese are taken by recreational hunters per year. Nice like WasteIH
Inconvenient truth. Damn details eh. Smash your keyboard and suck your thumb

[Guest]

A5 has no science to back up his opinions and gets distracted easily by irrelevant issues.

But don't let that stop you from bring up wacky theories and using the flat earth scientific method! LOL

Scott Moe and Saskpower are installing lots of wind power in Saskatchewan. 50% renewablse by 2030.

Oly, you better call them up and tell them they are killing all the geese that are eating your crop. Along with all the powerlines, vehicles and windows that kill many many many birds every year. No mention of those?

And large hail stones only hit solar panels! hahaaha If the hail stones are so big as the ones that caused the damage to the solar panels in the photo, your roof and windows, siding, vehicles will be done too. So should we stop using roofs too because of hail! LMAO

and the 50% renewalables will be 49% hydro

[Guest]

What is totally despicable is how (farm) organizations that are supposed to represent our interests are fully involved to the scam, using its language, working with its falsehoods, giving it another layer of false legitimacy.

they use all the catchphrases , its in the leftard bible ; "systemic racism" , "flat earthers" , "the science is settled" , the list can go on and on
and they're all too stupid to realize theyre are in a cult

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Over thousands of years. You really want to talk about the challenges of food production in a low CO2 environment thousands of years from now?

Your circular reasoning is keeping you from addressing the actual question.

Your thousands of years number is orders ( with an s) of magnitude too high. If this were an issue thousands of years from now, it would not be an issue, because we will have exhausted nearly every other resource long before that.

This is a much more immediate problem IF, the hairbrained politicians, inept UN bureaucrats, and mathematically challenged green movements actually succeed against all odds to "decarbonize" within a couple of decades.

If you have evidence to the contrary, please provide it, to alleviate my concerns.

[Jay-mo]

and the 50% renewalables will be 49% hydro

Yep, MB Hydro is currently building a transmission line to Saskatchewan to triple their supply of hydro power.

[burnt]

they use all the catchphrases , its in the leftard bible ; "systemic racism" , "flat earthers" , "the science is settled" , the list can go on and on
and they're all too stupid to realize theyre are in a cult

They come by that characteristic honestly - statistics show that one out of three Liberals is as stupid as the other two.