So I ate breakfast this morning as I do, iPad in hand, as usual, perusing news and items of interest. Girls got mail yesterday and in it were two farming mags, ‘farming better’ and ‘farming for tomorrow’.
I sighed. I knew from the cover, what would be in the pages. More of the same old, same old.
Which was confirmed upon cracking them open.
X and y farm seven million acres, blah blah blah. Expanded their acres, blah blah blah.
Why can we never see stories about up and coming people doing it differently? I have a friend who is starting out farming, no family backing, no established business, no land. I like what he is doing. I think he will succeed. Raising cattle. Marketing differently. Using old machinery. Using auction sale fence materials.
But no, x and y with their seven million acres takes precedence. Because that is working so well, is revitalizing our communities, putting more folks on the land. Pffft.
We need more ppl on the land, not fewer. We should be encouraging ppl like my friend who are breaking the mould. Instead all we hear is seven million acres, precision ag, fungicide for profit, blah blah blah.
Is size all that we see as being successful? More stuff to take with us when we die?
I’m writing the editors to ask if they are open to other ideas for future mags. Do small farmers have anything to contribute? Does the typical grow bigger farmer somehow have more insight, more sway in their voice?
I know quite a few small and new farmers with some pretty cool ideas, making it on their own without borrowed money, without government money. Can we not learn from them? How about the one quarter farm raising yaks for meat? The one quarter farm putting their meat products on restaurant plates in Saskatoon? The 80 acre farm producing goat cheese? The 40 acre garlic farm? The ten acre market garden?The Berkshire pork farm? The cricket farmer? These stories would encourage new entrants, it would let them see there IS a way to become a farmer, without following the seemingly set in stone, must have millions of acres to farm, with a fleet of machinery worth more than they can imagine.
We need more farmers not fewer. Let’s help the small and different idea ppl get going. Not belittle them and act arrogant towards them. I am letting my friend run cows on my land for free. I am also giving him some feed that I don’t need so he can get a bit of a leg up.
What are you all doing to help out the different thinkers in the industry? Farming and our rural communities will not be revitalized by worshipping and trying to be just like the big and “successful†farms. It will be revitalized by making a way for new farmers to farm. It will be revitalized by different ideas in how to grow and market food and other products. It will be revitalized only if we get more people back on the land. We ‘established farmers’ should be helping them.
If we don’t change our tune, this rural landscape is going to completely empty out of souls. Do we want that?
Thanks for listening...
I sighed. I knew from the cover, what would be in the pages. More of the same old, same old.
Which was confirmed upon cracking them open.
X and y farm seven million acres, blah blah blah. Expanded their acres, blah blah blah.
Why can we never see stories about up and coming people doing it differently? I have a friend who is starting out farming, no family backing, no established business, no land. I like what he is doing. I think he will succeed. Raising cattle. Marketing differently. Using old machinery. Using auction sale fence materials.
But no, x and y with their seven million acres takes precedence. Because that is working so well, is revitalizing our communities, putting more folks on the land. Pffft.
We need more ppl on the land, not fewer. We should be encouraging ppl like my friend who are breaking the mould. Instead all we hear is seven million acres, precision ag, fungicide for profit, blah blah blah.
Is size all that we see as being successful? More stuff to take with us when we die?
I’m writing the editors to ask if they are open to other ideas for future mags. Do small farmers have anything to contribute? Does the typical grow bigger farmer somehow have more insight, more sway in their voice?
I know quite a few small and new farmers with some pretty cool ideas, making it on their own without borrowed money, without government money. Can we not learn from them? How about the one quarter farm raising yaks for meat? The one quarter farm putting their meat products on restaurant plates in Saskatoon? The 80 acre farm producing goat cheese? The 40 acre garlic farm? The ten acre market garden?The Berkshire pork farm? The cricket farmer? These stories would encourage new entrants, it would let them see there IS a way to become a farmer, without following the seemingly set in stone, must have millions of acres to farm, with a fleet of machinery worth more than they can imagine.
We need more farmers not fewer. Let’s help the small and different idea ppl get going. Not belittle them and act arrogant towards them. I am letting my friend run cows on my land for free. I am also giving him some feed that I don’t need so he can get a bit of a leg up.
What are you all doing to help out the different thinkers in the industry? Farming and our rural communities will not be revitalized by worshipping and trying to be just like the big and “successful†farms. It will be revitalized by making a way for new farmers to farm. It will be revitalized by different ideas in how to grow and market food and other products. It will be revitalized only if we get more people back on the land. We ‘established farmers’ should be helping them.
If we don’t change our tune, this rural landscape is going to completely empty out of souls. Do we want that?
Thanks for listening...
Comment