Originally posted by farming101
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tesla Megapack
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
Originally posted by dalek View PostThe last 3 commercial elevators built here are running everything off NG generators
Comment
-
Originally posted by furrowtickler View PostThe only reason you guys farm ..... hmmm speaks volumes
BTW I agree with you post ðŸ‘
The last part is telling though
BTW, today is Tesla battery day. Solid state 400 whrs/kg? Maybe? No more lithium? Exciting. Waiting eagerly.
Comment
-
-
And dropping, wind now down to 0.02% of generation. When I saw those low numbers last winter I thought maybe it was just an anomaly during the cold weather. Apparently not so.
Comment
-
-
I checked a few more times lately. As low as 10 MW, up to 17 MW. At 10 MW, that is meeting 0.01% of Alberta's demand. Name plate would be almost 20%. California decommissioned a lot of conventional plants thinking wind and solar would replace them, with resulting blackouts and exorbitant price increases , fortunately AB hasn't yet done so.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostSee the gross ignorance in Chuck's post #60 as an example of what I am talking about. A wholly government owned utility is mandating expanding renewables way past the point of complete grid destabilization, and shills like Chuck just repeat it ad nauseum, as if repetition is somehow going to make all the technical hurdles magically disappear.
This is the type of ignorant misinformation, and the useful idiots we are up against, and the reason why some of us make the effort to point out the absurdity and shortcomings of such wishful thinking.
Here is one hurdle, I hadn't checked ASEO for months, so I had a look this AM. Wind generation in Alberta is currently at ~7% of nameplate capacity and falling steadily all morning so far. As we pointed out last winter, it fell to zero sometimes. Solar was 0 until after 8 AM today. If grid scale battery storage existed at at cost that could be remotely competetive with fossil fuels, then these periods would be a non issue. A recent MIT study found that storage costs need to decline by a full order of magnitude to be competitive.
As Oneoff likes to say, anything is possible if you put enough horsepower behind it. Or in this case, taxpayer dollars, and consumer extortion. Can sask reach 50% average.? Definitely. Will that reduce CO2 output, or fossil fuel consumption when it all needs to be backed up by fossil fuels? Will anyone be able to afford the electricity coming out the other end?
Fossil fuels also have hidden environmental and health costs which are not included in their pricing. They are also subsidized in various ways so when you add it all up they are not as cheap as you think they are. But you don’t want to discuss these issues! HahaLast edited by chuckChuck; Sep 22, 2020, 16:38.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment