Originally posted by chuckChuck
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
500 million for electric vehicle production
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostThen why does the cheapest generation source result in the most expensive electricity in the world? You still haven't answered my question in the other thread about if that was the goal, or an unintended consequence?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Zephyr View PostTell me,
Why is it that most of you on here hold on so fervently to one energy source?
Geothermal can generate power and heat homes without emissions.
Hydrogen is largely untapped.
Hydroelectric dams last for hundreds of years and produce clean energy plus manage a resource.
Wind is always blowing. Might as well use it for something?
Battery packs keep getting better. Oil is a battery too.
Bio-waste can be turned into heat power and fuel for engines and turbines plus remove waste and gas from landfills.
Instead of trucks and cars think hyperloop and electric trains.
You truly want to know why we go nowhere in this country? It's because the majority of people - regardless of political spectrum - would rather bash an idea than come up with one, fund one, or build one.
Hell, I'm sure the wheel and fire would never have been adopted if the entire world was like you guys
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostThen why does the cheapest generation source result in the most expensive electricity in the world? You still haven't answered my question in the other thread about if that was the goal, or an unintended consequence?
In April 2020, Bloomberg New Energy Finance found "Solar PV and onshore wind are now the cheapest sources of new-build generation for at least two-thirds of the global population. Those two-thirds live in locations that comprise 71% of gross domestic product and 85% of energy generation. Battery storage is now the cheapest new-build technology for peaking purposes (up to two-hours of discharge duration) in gas-importing regions, like Europe, China or Japan."
Comment
-
Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View PostThen why does the cheapest generation source result in the most expensive electricity in the world? You still haven't answered my question in the other thread about if that was the goal, or an unintended consequence?
Comment
-
Originally posted by tweety View PostBetter update your knowledge there Mr Farmer
In April 2020, Bloomberg New Energy Finance found "Solar PV and onshore wind are now the cheapest sources of new-build generation for at least two-thirds of the global population. Those two-thirds live in locations that comprise 71% of gross domestic product and 85% of energy generation. Battery storage is now the cheapest new-build technology for peaking purposes (up to two-hours of discharge duration) in gas-importing regions, like Europe, China or Japan."
I have offered this challenge to Chuck for the past few years. Please find a location in the world where adding renewable energy hasn't resulted in higher costs to the end users, relative to a location who hasn't done so. Somewhere between generating the cheapest energy, and reliably delivering that energy to the consumer on demand 24/7, the cheapest becomes the most expensive. This experiment has been repeated over and over with the same results. When the results are different somewhere, I will gladly become a proponent.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tweety View PostBetter update your knowledge there Mr Farmer
In April 2020, Bloomberg New Energy Finance found "Solar PV and onshore wind are now the cheapest sources of new-build generation for at least two-thirds of the global population. Those two-thirds live in locations that comprise 71% of gross domestic product and 85% of energy generation. Battery storage is now the cheapest new-build technology for peaking purposes (up to two-hours of discharge duration) in gas-importing regions, like Europe, China or Japan."
Sell any of this garbage to farmers ??
Running about 1/3 of anything else in area regardless of seed company.
If not not to worry , but I know you big Dekalb guy from previous posts
Comment
-
Or actually who knows with some of you on here
You claim to be farmers , then not , then change your name , admitting it , then denying it
All the while continuing to bash 80% of the real farmers on here for differing opinions. You should be proud of yourselves .
Comment
-
Originally posted by furrowtickler View PostHow’s the office job ?
Sell any of this garbage to farmers ??
Running about 1/3 of anything else in area regardless of seed company.
If not not to worry , but I know you big Dekalb guy from previous posts
Comment
-
Originally posted by Misterjade9 View PostI would imagine that the bag of seed was a third of the price of other brands, right?
Yep they know sooooooo much lol
Comment
-
Dekalb pod shatter roundup was pure garbage, could not handle the heavy rains we had at all
Wish I would have put another variety on same field split it up to show how bad it was. All the canola was not good here but these were a joke.
Comment
-
Every SeedCo wants to say they have a variety in their portfolio that can be left to mature standing to be straight-cut, call it what you want.
But when the pods split open or fall to the ground Producers are supposed to just accept that.
Sounds like false advertising to me.
From "Electric vehicle production" to canola pod shatter, damn we're good!Last edited by farmaholic; Sep 25, 2020, 10:30.
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment