• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Three pulse companies licenses lost?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #25
    Is the a Chief Commissioner yet? Ritz did away with the Office of Assistant Commissioners and down to Chief Commissioner and only 2 Ass't Commissioners. If there isn't a Chief do we really have anyone running it? We have a problem.

    Comment


      #26
      We need legislation when the grain is dumped the cheque is written period

      Comment


        #27
        Originally posted by the big wheel View Post
        We need legislation when the grain is dumped the cheque is written period
        We do it is Sec 61 (1) of the Grain Act problem is enforcement. Does nobody remember why or what the Office of Assistant Commissioners was for?

        Comment


          #28
          Originally posted by walterm View Post
          We do it is Sec 61 (1) of the Grain Act problem is enforcement. Does nobody remember why or what the Office of Assistant Commissioners was for?
          61 (1) Subject to subsection (2), if grain is lawfully offered at a licensed primary elevator for sale or storage, other than for special binning, the operator of the elevator shall, at the prescribed time and in the prescribed manner, issue a cash purchase ticket or elevator receipt stating the grade name, grade and dockage of the grain, and immediately provide it to the producer.

          Comment


            #29
            Didn't every link of the grain marketing chain get exactly what they wanted when marketing freedom was achieved?

            Not paying grain producers for their grain is the equivalent of fraud and theft.
            Company Principals, shareholders and Boards of Directors should be held to account, and not be able to hide behind corporations and BOD immunity. Maybe there would be less carelessness.

            Comment


              #30
              Originally posted by walterm View Post
              We do it is Sec 61 (1) of the Grain Act problem is enforcement. Does nobody remember why or what the Office of Assistant Commissioners was for?
              The problem is that so many of them don’t do it that if you want to move something you have to accept that’s the norm but it shouldn’t be.

              Comment


                #31
                Originally posted by the big wheel View Post
                The problem is that so many of them don’t do it that if you want to move something you have to accept that’s the norm but it shouldn’t be.
                Yes and that is exactly why the Grain Commission was started in the first place. "In the Interest of Producers" but Ritz and his supporters wanted to change it to "In the Interest of the Industry" Although it never passed parl. it seems to have been adopted by the industry because it suits them.

                I was at a presentation in Vancouver at the CGC office they used "In The Interest of the Industry" on their header in presentation showing their Mandate! This was the same presentation they showed international guests. This was when Ritz was still in charge so you can't blame this gov't for misleading.

                Comment

                • Reply to this Thread
                • Return to Topic List
                Working...