You are bang on Bucket.
Growers don’t have a mechanism to hedge the risk of pre pricing or selling the crops they grow:
Yes farmers can use futures and options
yes farmers can use exporter contracts
Those are both physical and paper mechanisms. What if there is a drought, hail, insects, disease, political, logistical issues? How do growers hedge that, and crop insurance or agristabilty don’t cut it. Those are insurance programs.
Growers need information, to make the correct decisions, analyzing opportunities and risks. This is the one piece of information that is missing for growers to help mitigate this risk.
Let’s look at this year, and use canola as the example:
- 20,000,000 mt production roughly
- Roughly 25% through our marketing year (3 months of 12, I understand aug 1, but new crop isn’t available until sept 1)
- Roughly 7,000,000 mt grower deliveries so far according to CGC
- NOW The question “What are the rest of the volumes the crushers have purchased or the exporters contracted�
- at the current producer deliveries should run out of canola by May
- it’s not ok for the crushers and exporters to hold hostage growers with their “internal†analysis, maximizing there profits with information growers cannot access. Why would the exporters and crushers not want sales reporting? How could this harm their current business? How can the USA do this and still have a thriving export system?
Futures are not enough, nor are exporter or crusher forward contracts or internal futures hedge / pricing programs.
What % of this crop(2020) has been physically, sold through contract to importers or domestic users?
What % of (2021) crop has been sold?
It looks like price rationing needs to happen to slow down usage. This isn’t happening, the canola buyers are holding back price offers to growers buying creating “positions†that growers can’t make informed decisions with.
Etc
Growers don’t have a mechanism to hedge the risk of pre pricing or selling the crops they grow:
Yes farmers can use futures and options
yes farmers can use exporter contracts
Those are both physical and paper mechanisms. What if there is a drought, hail, insects, disease, political, logistical issues? How do growers hedge that, and crop insurance or agristabilty don’t cut it. Those are insurance programs.
Growers need information, to make the correct decisions, analyzing opportunities and risks. This is the one piece of information that is missing for growers to help mitigate this risk.
Let’s look at this year, and use canola as the example:
- 20,000,000 mt production roughly
- Roughly 25% through our marketing year (3 months of 12, I understand aug 1, but new crop isn’t available until sept 1)
- Roughly 7,000,000 mt grower deliveries so far according to CGC
- NOW The question “What are the rest of the volumes the crushers have purchased or the exporters contracted�
- at the current producer deliveries should run out of canola by May
- it’s not ok for the crushers and exporters to hold hostage growers with their “internal†analysis, maximizing there profits with information growers cannot access. Why would the exporters and crushers not want sales reporting? How could this harm their current business? How can the USA do this and still have a thriving export system?
Futures are not enough, nor are exporter or crusher forward contracts or internal futures hedge / pricing programs.
What % of this crop(2020) has been physically, sold through contract to importers or domestic users?
What % of (2021) crop has been sold?
It looks like price rationing needs to happen to slow down usage. This isn’t happening, the canola buyers are holding back price offers to growers buying creating “positions†that growers can’t make informed decisions with.
Etc
Comment