• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

$700/tone canola

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #25
    You are bang on Bucket.

    Growers don’t have a mechanism to hedge the risk of pre pricing or selling the crops they grow:
    Yes farmers can use futures and options
    yes farmers can use exporter contracts
    Those are both physical and paper mechanisms. What if there is a drought, hail, insects, disease, political, logistical issues? How do growers hedge that, and crop insurance or agristabilty don’t cut it. Those are insurance programs.

    Growers need information, to make the correct decisions, analyzing opportunities and risks. This is the one piece of information that is missing for growers to help mitigate this risk.

    Let’s look at this year, and use canola as the example:
    - 20,000,000 mt production roughly
    - Roughly 25% through our marketing year (3 months of 12, I understand aug 1, but new crop isn’t available until sept 1)
    - Roughly 7,000,000 mt grower deliveries so far according to CGC
    - NOW The question “What are the rest of the volumes the crushers have purchased or the exporters contracted”?
    - at the current producer deliveries should run out of canola by May
    - it’s not ok for the crushers and exporters to hold hostage growers with their “internal” analysis, maximizing there profits with information growers cannot access. Why would the exporters and crushers not want sales reporting? How could this harm their current business? How can the USA do this and still have a thriving export system?

    Futures are not enough, nor are exporter or crusher forward contracts or internal futures hedge / pricing programs.

    What % of this crop(2020) has been physically, sold through contract to importers or domestic users?

    What % of (2021) crop has been sold?

    It looks like price rationing needs to happen to slow down usage. This isn’t happening, the canola buyers are holding back price offers to growers buying creating “positions” that growers can’t make informed decisions with.

    Etc
    Last edited by Rareearth; Nov 23, 2020, 08:40.

    Comment


      #26
      Originally posted by Richard5 View Post
      Everyone should be 50% sold of 2020's crop. If you don't like $12 nearby price then book something for May/June with 35-40 cents more. If the price is fortunate to keep rising you can always price 10-15% more a couple times and keep averaging up.

      I fear another big stock market crash/correction coming in the very near future. Many have been able to manage finances but a second shutdown/slowdown will cause a lot of bankruptcies
      Well then I'm way behind. Haven't even considered 2020 crop yet. What percent of 2019 crop should be priced by now? I just finished selling 2017 and 2018, unfortunately, too early in this rally. Seemed like a great opportunity at the time though.

      Comment


        #27
        There is a real probability that this would make the CGC statistics more reliable and timely. Reporting should be for all grains. The CGC could be functional and provide a valuable service for industry again (and tax payers, who help fund and stabilize through insurance programming for ag industry) vs select portions of the value chain.

        Why wouldn’t the CGC lobby for this?

        Why wouldn’t producer groups?

        Apps?

        NFU?

        Provincial Ag dept.

        This would provide forecasting, demand for the railways to plan- execute rail car needs, as well for the rest of the supply chain.
        Last edited by Rareearth; Nov 23, 2020, 08:32.

        Comment


          #28
          Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
          Lots is uncertainty ahead , but stocks may be very thin come June?
          June? By the action in the trade I figure by April stocks get thin.

          And now that they are trying to draw out bushels early to get ahead of that, producers are probably seeing that, probably hold on longer.

          The markets and commentators are transparent as can be. They did the exact same thing last yr to keep prices in check. Run out of #1 supply in march, then start buying heated stuff and blending it in, then get to the seeding season and start peppering the news with stories of a bumper crop to bridge the summer gap. They drew a lot of presellers in to the charade in early August dumping crop for $2 less than it is now.

          Comment


            #29
            Originally posted by Rareearth View Post
            There is a real probability that this would make the CGC statistics more reliable and timely. Reporting should be for all grains. The CGC could be functional and provide a valuable service for industry again (and tax payers, who help fund and stabilize through insurance programming for ag industry) vs select portions of the value chain.

            Why wouldn’t the CGC lobby for this?

            Why wouldn’t producer groups?

            Apps?

            NFU?

            Provincial Ag dept.
            Because theyre masters wont let them
            This would provide forecasting, demand for the railways to plan- execute rail car needs, as well for the rest of the supply chain.
            Because theyre masters wont let them

            Comment


              #30
              Originally posted by jazz View Post
              June? By the action in the trade I figure by April stocks get thin.

              And now that they are trying to draw out bushels early to get ahead of that, producers are probably seeing that, probably hold on longer.

              The markets and commentators are transparent as can be. They did the exact same thing last yr to keep prices in check. Run out of #1 supply in march, then start buying heated stuff and blending it in, then get to the seeding season and start peppering the news with stories of a bumper crop to bridge the summer gap. They drew a lot of presellers in to the charade in early August dumping crop for $2 less than it is now.
              The question I ask, is what will higher prices in the middle of winter accomplish? It won't increase supply in the Northern Hemisphere, harvest is long since over, any seeding intention changes won't have any effect until next September. As I understand, most southern Hemisphere canola is winter, so won't increase acres or inputs there. the only thing higher prices can do is motivate stubborn sellers to part with their crop. But lower prices have the same effect. When prices go up every day, it is easy to get complacent and keep waiting for better opportunities. A sharp correction seems to be more effective at scaring some bushels loose.

              Can higher prices curb demand, is there any alternative anywhere right now?

              Comment


                #31
                We have been lied to for many yrs why prices were where they were.
                Who do you believe any more?

                Comment


                  #32
                  Alternative to canola would be Palm, soy, sunflower, ( and I’ll throw in corn).
                  Canola is undervalued, why, so exporters and crushers (record crush margins ?) can increase profits.



                  At who’s expense?

                  Comment


                    #33
                    Farmers are in one of the strangest positions when it comes to markets they deal with.

                    Input side and selling our production.

                    Since when should you put 100% faith in the information coming from the people who sell you inputs or buys your production? Whose best interest is being taken care of?

                    You are both a purchaser and a seller with not alot of control over prices of either side of the transaction that affects you.

                    Comment


                      #34
                      Originally posted by Rareearth View Post
                      Alternative to canola would be Palm, soy, sunflower, ( and I’ll throw in corn).
                      Canola is undervalued, why, so exporters and crushers (record crush margins ?) can increase profits.



                      At who’s expense?
                      Yes, alternative products, but I meant alternatives that haven't experienced similar price appreciation. They all seem to be following the same trajectory.

                      Comment


                        #35
                        Originally posted by farmaholic View Post
                        Farmers are in one of the strangest positions when it comes to markets they deal with.

                        Input side and selling our production.

                        Since when should you put 100% faith in the information coming from the people who sell you inputs or buys your production? Whose best interest is being taken care of?

                        You are both a purchaser and a seller with not alot of control over prices of either side of the transaction that affects you.
                        Worse is when you can only get delivery if you buy the inputs from them....and yet the old saying goes...dont sell to them...Thats right drive another hour to deliver grain...

                        Comment


                          #36
                          A local buyer at a line co (winnipeg families), told me that one time as well, buy his inputs, or no grain contracts. I wonder how well that is working out for them now with all the new competition around them who dont sell inputs (viterra, G3 Bunge). Plus their bids always the worst. I prefer to buy my inputs from independent retailers, much better service.

                          Comment

                          • Reply to this Thread
                          • Return to Topic List
                          Working...