apples to apples

[jazz]

Your inherent human rights are enshrined in the constitution and charter of freedoms. You do not have to give any reciprocal fealty to exercise your rights. Discrimination based on faulty public orders would fall square into that realm.

There is nothing in that document saying you have to do anything in exchange to get your rights protected. You have to obey the laws of the land. Public health orders are not laws and were not passed by any of our elected representatives. They are illegal by their very nature.

dml needs a little brush up on the law.

[burnt]

Burnt, how was my argument a non sequitur? I stated that a person should follow the rules and wear a mask to mitigate covid risk or stay home. tubs turned that around and said I should stay home and he should be able to do what he wants (ignore covid mitigation rules). I want to know if tubs feels that an individual should have the right to ignore rules extends to other risk mitigating rules such as drinking and driving. This is not a non sequitur or gaslighting. Nor is it a weak argument. Your jumping in and name calling and insinuation of me "knowing" is closer to the definition of gaslighting than my question of tubs

Name calling.

Wow.

As if further evidence was needed, you continue to undermine yourself.