Originally posted by Blaithin
View Post
I will highlight in bold what i find interesting
You can't know the ludicrous reasoning behind railway logic until you've dealt with them. I'm not saying that's for sure what happened in this case, but it's highly likely it plays a part. Saying trains go past it doesn't matter. The main drive behind loop tracks in new builds and changing spur lines to loops or kidney beans is the railways saying they want to service loops, not lines. Railways also want large trains, over 100 cars, to make it more worth their while. They don't want to piss around with 30 car spots.
Ok so the railways will allow G3, as an example , to operate CP's train on the loop for loading....
But an elevator with no other business on a branch line can't load straight through the same as a loop? You understand the logic I am suggesting...With the diminished business and the appropriate distance to load on these branch lines why do need to limit the carload to the spot anymore...
If Eyebrow could load 112 cars straight through ..surely the rules could be changed to treat it like a loop...the only other customer is the Viterra at Strongfield/GDT and one other...but surely to christ CP knows what they are sending for trains on that branch line...
Hope that is clear enough explanation...
Maybe that is some of the thought process I forgot to mention in my earlier musings about this point...
You have engaged in a good discussion...maybe some lurker at Viterra/CP will read our discussion.
Comment