• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sales reporting

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    You mean to the USSR on the never never plan?

    Or to Syria or Iraq with kickbacks to the dictators?

    Yea, I remember those.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by bucket View Post
      And were the sales also at the buyers (china) call and price?
      I don't recall and we can't even look it up because all the records got destroyed.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by wmoebis View Post
        I don't recall and we can't even look it up because all the records got destroyed.
        Of course!

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by bucket View Post
          And were the sales also at the buyers (china) call and price?
          And what's the difference if you substitute (China) with MNP, P&H, Cargill, Richardson, etc etc in todays grain markets you sell to ?


          Shortbox

          Ritz Cracker made sure those records were destroyed when he gave the CWB to the Saudi's. What did you get from that deal?
          Last edited by foragefarmer; Feb 9, 2021, 18:14.

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by SASKFARMER View Post
            Owned it will be paid.
            This thread has turned into the usual vinegar so I'll add this. Sometimes attitudes like yours are part of the problem. The percentage of rented land is not going away soon and the credits go with title. Another program that becomes useless or a gift to non farmers.
            On a similar note they postponed responsible grain till fall. Big f n surprise.

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by blackpowder View Post
              This thread has turned into the usual vinegar so I'll add this. Sometimes attitudes like yours are part of the problem. The percentage of rented land is not going away soon and the credits go with title. Another program that becomes useless or a gift to non farmers.
              On a similar note they postponed responsible grain till fall. Big f n surprise.
              bump

              you cant let this die - or it will...

              Comment


                #47
                Without knowing how much grain has been locked up for export there is no food security.
                That as much as anything is what was behind the start of sales reporting in the US.
                Second was that the real value of that food stock was not accounted for and it was gone.

                It is not the job of the importer to put a real value on what they want to import. They just want to get it as cheap as the can for as long as they need to.
                So, it is the job of the exporting entity to put a value on that product for export. Otherwise they will not have a domestic industry for long or it will be a very sick one.
                It's just basic accounting. You cannot account for what you don't count in the first place. And the best time to start counting is when it is signed up to go.

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by sumdumguy View Post
                  Does anyone (Tom) have the exact wording of the “sales reporting resolution”?
                  Found the ASG AGM Resolution that passed with over 90% in favour:

                  Resolution #3 – Compiled Weekly Export Sales Report
                  Background: The U.S. Department of Agriculture mandates the grain buying corporations to
                  report their grain sales over a certain set minimum tonnage to be reported daily and compiled
                  weekly. The structure of this system in the USA allows for a transparent marketplace so that
                  farmers have the ability to better gauge market conditions and execute their grain marketing
                  decisions by being more informed and therefore giving them a more strategic advantage.
                  WHEREAS, we as seed growers are directly affected by the current marketing disadvantage in
                  Canada, because it does not allow us the opportunity to be more proactive towards planning
                  our next years seed production based on current global exports;
                  WHEREAS, our pedigreed seed pricing is all relative to the commercial market of grain, so if the
                  commercial producers can gain the advantage of having the export data on a daily basis versus
                  every 6 weeks, the output of greater commercial grain profits will directly reflect positively on
                  our pedigreed seed business;
                  WHEREAS, several of the Saskatchewan Grain Councils have already put forward a resolution at
                  their 2021 AGM’s with respect to this requirement of more transparent and timely reporting of
                  crop exports in Canada. Alberta Seed Growers supporting and lobbying for this movement will
                  add value to our crop business and benefit all Pedigreed Seed Growers across Canada;
                  THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that it be mandated for Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and the
                  Canada Grains Council to establish a compiled weekly export sales report from all grain buying
                  commodity companies that must provide data on the amount of their export grain sales, and
                  this information be made public data on a more frequent basis every day.
                  Moved by: Stephen Sendziak Seconded by: Don Sendziak Passed Feb 2021

                  There was a small revision adding imports as well that because of the Virtual Meeting format was not in this original Resolution.

                  Thanks,
                  Tom4cwb

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by LWeber View Post
                    bump

                    you cant let this die - or it will...
                    Not sure what you mean Larry.
                    As long as carbon credits are assigned to title they will be a gift to non resident landowners. Especially if they someday go higher under some new scheme.
                    I've had landlords salivate over and specifically word leases ensuring they receive their "fair share" (all) should they ever increase.
                    With the antipathy of some and the arrogance of others, anything carbon will be structured unfavorably for half the industry. This past program may have been a joke. Is it the last????
                    I can bet I'm in the minority to be calling BS on this one.
                    What would you suggest be done?

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Cancellations get reported quick........

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...