Af5, you are ignoring the point I am making. I responded to Hamloc statement regarding the loss of land due to solar installations. The point I was trying to make is hydro, which most on the forum support also utiizes land some of which may be used for cropping, grazing or even forestry. Keephills is the largest open surface mine in Canada and has permitted over 12000 ha for coal mining to provide electrical power. Coal is not renewable, and at keephills has utilized land, some of which had agricultural potential.
Do you agree with opening the eastern slopes of the Rockies for coal mining? Some of that land has been used for generations for ranching. And that coal is not even generating power, it only provides a low royalty payment.
the fact is resource extraction also uses land, just as renewables do and if someone like Hamloc thinks a valid arguement against solar is to measure MW/acre, then it is fair game to look at the land cost for conventional electrical production including coal and hydro
Do you agree with opening the eastern slopes of the Rockies for coal mining? Some of that land has been used for generations for ranching. And that coal is not even generating power, it only provides a low royalty payment.
the fact is resource extraction also uses land, just as renewables do and if someone like Hamloc thinks a valid arguement against solar is to measure MW/acre, then it is fair game to look at the land cost for conventional electrical production including coal and hydro
Comment