Agriville is like going to the coffee shop to discuss the days news with a bit more depth. Sometimes interesting and fun, but not that important to the future of the world. LOL
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Deadline approaching: Ottawa wants answer from Prairies on AgriStability program
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
Originally posted by Hamloc View PostChuck2 you constantly talk about how irrelevant posters on “agrisilly†are, why do you continue to post?!
Comment
-
A5, you have provided more than your fair share of silly.
What are your thoughts on the proposed changes to Agristability?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostNot one farm organization is asking for that and its not going to happen. So why would you turn down very good improvements? Sask and Manitoba like the changes they are just concerned about paying for them.
I repeat they are not improvements and for it to be considered as such is stupid.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostNot one farm organization is asking for that and its not going to happen. So why would you turn down very good improvements? Sask and Manitoba like the changes they are just concerned about paying for them.
Crop insurance has a similar problem, but at least they are bankable in current yr disaster and always have coverage for spring mishaps like establishment from flooding or beetles. And you dont have to submit another layer of accounting records to qualify or pay out. Everything is adjusted on the ground in near real time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostA5, you have provided more than your fair share of silly.
What are your thoughts on the proposed changes to Agristability?
I am not in Agristability or crop insurance. I don't want a fiscally and morally corrupt government subsidizing farmers or any other business.
I support personal responsibility, and taking measured risk, not dependance on the nanny state. Subsidies, insurance and supports have had the opposite effect to what is intended. Taking away the risk only allows the big to get bigger faster, and I believe you are against that.
Comment
-
I also want to add that all Of these government programs easily turn into a carrot and stick , As they try to find ways to enforce their Definition of sustainability and Emissions regulations.
To take advantage of these programs will probably mean Enrolling in every other harebrained scheme they come up with in the name of the environment. We will end up throwing good money after bad chasing an ever moving goal post, with still no chance of seeing a return on investment.
If Chuck and by extension the NFU are in support, then we should be running the other way.
Comment
-
-
Guest
lots on here are good with it ?
gotta wonder WTF is rattling around in their F KN heads
Canada a country which is a natural sink , one of the most highly regulated in the world and one of the cleanest ??? how can these Sheeple be so simple as to not realize its just a liberano cash grab ??????
meanwhile numbnut's pals are building record amounts of coal fired generators
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment