O'Toole declares 'the debate is over' on climate change, but his party's grassroots d

[foragefarmer]

Conservatives just can't get along with each other.

The Reformers highjacked the CP party, as they knew they were not ever going to form government in Canada.

These social Reformers should just reinvent another party so the fiscal Conservatives can move on and Govern Canada again.

[Sheepwheat]

Conservatives just can't get along with each other.

The Reformers highjacked the CP party, as they knew they were not ever going to form government in Canada.

These social Reformers should just reinvent another party so the fiscal Conservatives can move on and Govern Canada again.

Liberals don’t get along either. They simply force everyone to think the same, quashing any diversity at all.
When Trudeau chose candidates, he ensured each one was for killing babies, for example.

[foragefarmer]

My point has been proved, move on Reformer.

[Sheepwheat]

My point has been proved, move on Reformer.

So you are pro killing? Because I’m pro life. Quite proud to be too.

[sumdumguy]

Jazz, the thing was that his garbage surfaced at the very worst time, just before Canada went to the polls and they came pelting down, almost every day and he was so evasive answering to the citizenship, kids schooling. It just looked really bad. IMHO, Trudeau never won the election, Cons lost it. They have to show strength and resolve not smiley faces and duh.

[Sheepwheat]

Jazz, the thing was that his garbage surfaced at the very worst time, just before Canada went to the polls and they came pelting down, almost every day and he was so evasive answering to the citizenship, kids schooling. It just looked really bad.

The blackface story came out at what would have been a terrible time as well though. But it didn’t matter even a little bit to the immoral creeps in this country who chose Trudeau.

[blackpowder]

If quebec can have its own national party, why not the prairies??
We need a two term law.

[jazz]

The election is just theatre. trudeau is going to get in again on the backs of the media and $500B in cash thrown around during a pandemic. People love that and only the party in power can do it. But he or Freeland is going to own the aftermath as well.

Frankly, I wouldnt want to be in power when Canada is stripped its AAA rating. borrowing costs skyrocket and the currency tanks. Let him have it I say.

The west has 3 things upcoming that will define this nation for the future;

1. https://globalnews.ca/news/7707953/supreme-court-canada-carbon-tax-2/ carbon tax (scam) review at SC this month;
2. https://financialpost.com/news/fp-street/aimcos-next-move-as-alberta-contemplates-cpp-exit-investment-manager-focuses-on-rebuilding-trust Alberta withdraw from CPP (decision expected in summer);
3. Fall referendum

The who knows where it all goes. There will be a constitutional crisis in the country inside of a yr.

[burnt]

Conservatives had every chance of winning last election if not for Scheer’s baggage - American citizenship, kids schooling paid out of election fund, just too much garbage did him in. And sister in law working in constituency office. Rona or Pierre could win, no problem.

Yes, indeed.

If only someone could find some flaws in the liberal party leader and bring them to the media's attention.

Not likely it will happen though, since he's the model of integrity, equanimity, morality, intelligence and selflessness.

I'm sure that CBC would just run with such new information, and positively change the outcome of the next election! If only...

Right?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I see Chuck is back to using the non-scientific word "believe" in reference to global warming again.

Does it concern anyone else that national policy decisions are potentially being decided by what certain people "believe"?

Or that those certain people are not climate scientists, and in the case of the leader, is not a scientist (or STEM) of any description? Does he have any credentials that would lend credibility to him taking a position on this issue?

Or that anyone in any sphere can ever declare a scientific debate over? That is the most unscientific approach possible. This is reminiscent of the dark ages, or the inquisition, or a cult, where the leaders have the authority to declare something to be true, and outlaw all debate or evidence to the contrary. MIght as well declare hte end of progress, that would be the same.

Perhaps most concerning is that the party or the leadership thought this was an appropriate time to sow some excess split and disunity in the party by even bringing this subject up, when the population of the country is much more concerned about a pandemic(and that includes those on either side of that debate), and the ensuing financial implications. Global warming isn't even on the radar as a priority of the majority of Canadians according to polling, so why not lose some more votes by bringing this into the spotlight?