• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

O'Toole declares 'the debate is over' on climate change, but his party's grassroots d

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by foragefarmer View Post
    Personally I would rather see an adoption to a Gay couple than an abortion
    Maybe the boat was rocked enough.

    Anyway, I totally concur. A child raised by any good set of parents regardless of gender or orientation is better than the alternative.

    There are couples spending hundreds of thousands of dollars in IVF. I would think a match between that group and the abortion side would be much preferable as well.

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by foragefarmer View Post
      Not a peep from the Social Conservatives of Agriville. Made a lot of noise against abortion but became deafening silent regarding legally married Canadian Gay Couples adopting a baby to prevent an abortion.


      Where are you Sheep, Fjlip, Ajl, Oliver88, Tom4Tom, still waiting.

      Personally I would rather see a Gay Couple adopting than an abortion, what about you Social Conservatives of Agriville
      And I stated the fact you are pro death. Not a peep. What difference does it make what I think of gay “marriage”? You’ll simply freak out and have a fit.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by Sheepwheat View Post
        And I stated the fact you are pro death. Not a peep. What difference does it make what I think of gay “marriage”? You’ll simply freak out and have a fit.
        Not pro death, learn to read, I support adoption 100% over abortion, but it's not my choice it's the women choice.

        Now answer the question are you in favour of an adoption to a legally Married Gay Couple in Canada if it prevents an abortion.

        Simple question, open to you Sheep and your Like Button Buddies.

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by foragefarmer View Post
          Not pro death, learn to read, I support adoption 100% over abortion, but it's not my choice it's the women choice.

          Now answer the question are you in favour of an adoption to a legally Married Gay Couple in Canada if it prevents an abortion.

          Simple question, open to you Sheep and your Like Button Buddies.
          If it prevents an abortion? Absolutely. Ridiculous as the premise may be. How’s that? Happy now?
          Last edited by Sheepwheat; Mar 22, 2021, 20:22.

          Comment


            #65
            Question for you forage. Leslyn Lewis proposed putting a stop to gender selection abortions in Canada. That was the extent of her abortion policy.

            Are you for or against the idea of killing babies because the gender doesn’t line up?

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by Sheepwheat View Post
              Question for you forage. Leslyn Lewis proposed putting a stop to gender selection abortions in Canada. That was the extent of her abortion policy.

              Are you for or against the idea of killing babies because the gender doesn’t line up?

              Again learn to read, I'm in favour of adoption 100% over abortion why would I support gender selection?

              Again it's the women choice not some sheep farmer in Sask.


              "If it prevents an abortion? Absolutely. How’s that? Happy now? Reply With Quote"

              I notice you had to edit your original post as it was just to hard for you to swallow. Referencing Gay Marriage as "ridiculous" will help you sleep better I guess.

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by dmlfarmer View Post
                Interesting you use Micheal Mann as an example of "outright frauds". There has been 7 investigations by both US and Uk governments into the hockey stick graph and not one of them found wrong doing. Micheal Mann himself has been the subject of investigations by Penn State and the National Science Foundation Inspector General and neither found him guilty of wrong doing or fraud. Mann filed libel suits in the US 9 years ago that are still working their way through the courts and to this point the defendants have not provided any evidence that his work was fraudulent, but they are claiming innocent only on free speech grounds. Granted, his case against Tim Ball was thrown out of court in Canada, not because it found his work was proven to be fraudulent but because Mann did not meet a deadline for providing requested information.

                So i would be interested in the proof you must have to publicly claim Mann is an "outright fraud"

                Oh, and BTW on Jan 22 of this year, Mann asked Washington DC Superior Court for a summary judgement because the defendants have failed to put forward any evidence challenging the validity of his science.
                for your edification

                https://www.steynonline.com/documents/10974.pdf https://www.steynonline.com/documents/10974.pdf

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by foragefarmer View Post
                  Again learn to read, I'm in favour of adoption 100% over abortion why would I support gender selection?

                  Again it's the women choice not some sheep farmer in Sask.


                  "If it prevents an abortion? Absolutely. How’s that? Happy now? Reply With Quote"

                  I notice you had to edit your original post as it was just to hard for you to swallow. Referencing Gay Marriage as "ridiculous" will help you sleep better I guess.
                  I doesn’t make me feel better. It’s just the truth. I am entitled to my opinion as a sheep farmer in sask.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by Sheepwheat View Post
                    I doesn’t make me feel better. It’s just the truth. I am entitled to my opinion as a sheep farmer in sask.
                    The premise that a bunch of gays are going to save millions of babies from being pulled piece by piece from their mother is a ridiculous premise.

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by Sheepwheat View Post
                      The premise that a bunch of gays are going to save millions of babies from being pulled piece by piece from their mother is a ridiculous premise.
                      God alone is the Judge of the motivations of human heart... and further the motivations of those who love their neighbours as themselves.

                      There are countless couples waiting for babies... the fictitious premise [of too few couples] is specious and vexacious... We are not called to judge [God alone is responsible, at the Great White Throne after we die physically]... https://davidjeremiah.blog/what-is-the-great-white-throne-judgment-in-revelation/

                      but we are called to forgive and help healing the pain/suffering, and be a compassionate humble spirit.

                      Cheers
                      Last edited by TOM4CWB; Mar 22, 2021, 23:58.

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...