Why is Covid political?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Perhaps if we all thought twice before posting on sm the world would be a better place.

Even thinking once before posting would be a good start for some of us...

As dml rightly points out, the flip flopping of the detractors according to the latest political winds hasn't helped their cause.
Unfortunately in the era of social media, all of those comments and wild prognostications are recorded forever on the www.
Some sober second thought before posting might also involve reading through our own Old posts to avoid contradicting one's self. And considering the permanency of the posts.

[sumdumguy]

Yep, Astra Zeneca is only good for Trudeau and his buddies👍

[Taiga]

Liberals/Dems:
“ID is not, should not be, required to vote. It is racist to think otherwise. “
“We need vaccine passports, show me your papers if you want to pass through. “

I don’t see any politics involved.

[burnt]

Yep, Astra Zeneca is only good for Trudeau and his buddies👍

Is Trudeau over 55?

[jazz]

Is Trudeau over 55?

Yeah who made it political.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/astrazeneca-under-55-1.5968128

A cast of keystone cop clowns running this country.

I am surprised dmls instant recall memory doesn't hark back to when our top health expert said travel bans are racist, masks aren't necessary, risk is low and 2 weeks to flatten the curve.

And then some elite retards starting inserting great reset, build back better and new normal back into the narrative.

Where is oneoff, he said take whatever they tell you to without question.

[dmlfarmer]

Yet another study, this one from the cdc, says mask wearing decreases spread of Covid, by a whopping 0.7 per cent. But the EVIL msm, refuse to report on that, because they are complicit with the EVIL leaders.

That is not what the study investigated or the conclusions it came it. This claim by far right wing media has been disputed by the CDC and a number of fact checking organizations.
https://www.factcheck.org/2021/03/scicheck-posts-distort-cdc-study-supporting-masks-mandates-to-reduce-covid-19/ https://www.factcheck.org/2021/03/scicheck-posts-distort-cdc-study-supporting-masks-mandates-to-reduce-covid-19/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/03/12/fact-check-cdc-study-links-mask-mandates-slowed-covid-infections/6938262002/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/03/12/fact-check-cdc-study-links-mask-mandates-slowed-covid-infections/6938262002/

[fjlip]

"The study found that mask mandates were associated with a 0.5 percentage point decrease in daily COVID-19 case growth rates within the first 20 days. The reductions in growth rates increased with time, reaching 1.1, 1.5, 1.7 and 1.8 percentage points within 21 to 40, 41 to 60, 61 to 80, and 81 to 100 days, respectively, after implementation."

"In the first 20 days after implementing mask mandates, new cases slowed by 0.5 percentage points. They continued to fall over the 100 days analyzed in the study. COVID-19 death rates dropped by 0.7 percentage points in the first 20 days after masks were required."

Not the same wording?

Bet these are all Russian Conspired.











Not very effective...

[dmlfarmer]

"The study found that mask mandates .....

Do you honestly believe that the moment a mask mandate is implemented that every person puts on a mask and wears it all the time they are in close contact with another person, including family?

Mask mandates were the subject of the study, not mask effectiveness and there was no accounting for how many people did not wear masks even if mandated.

Second, there was a measureable decrease rate of growth in transmission, spread and death therefore the study concluded mask mandates are effective. If mask mandates are effective, then masks must be.

[Taiga]

0-19 years of age, 99.9% survival rate

20-49 years of age, 99.8% survival rate

Why would you even consider a vaccine if you are under 50.

Who the F would give it to their kids.

The cure is worse than the disease.

These vaccines are unproven and only approved for use by using various Emergency Acts.

Proven, readily available, successful, and cheap anti-virals that have been in use for decades are suddenly vilified simply because Trump suggests people talk to their doctors about them.

Real doctors are pissed off, fane doctors like One-off and Agstar continue their fear campaigns.

Real people continue to suffer and die because resources are pulled and directed to the China-sniffle-flu, surgeries are cancelled, cancers morph to Stage 4. Just so the Ken’s and Karen’s can glare at you over their masks, which do absolutely nothing.

Liberal cronies and friends with benefits suddenly overnight are running PPE companies and distribution centres from their houses.

No politics here.

[burnt]

Wesley Wark is likely just politicizing Tam's WuFlu response in his assessment report to the Auditor General on the government's response, right?

BTW, he said she was wrong, which was proven by her flip-flopping faster than a fish on a river bank.



Tam criticized for supporting ‘indefensible’ assessment of COVID-19 risk Tam criticized for supporting ‘indefensible’ assessment of COVID-19 risk