Bike lanes? Waste of money. Need scooter lanes for the elderly in the future.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Canada commits $400M to build sustainable transportation
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
-
So you guys are opposed to walking and cycling now? What next to hate for the angry mob? LOL
Every major city has parks with walking and cycling paths. Saskatoon has the Meewasin trail system of over 90km along the beautiful river . Its well used and well loved.
Wascana Park one of the largest urban parks in North America covering nearly a 2400 acres has over 10km of bike and walking paths that are also well used and well loved.
Most of the 14.9 billion where this 400 million for walking and cycling trails comes from, will be spent over 8 years to improve public transit.
Why are you opposed to encouraging people to get some excercise?
Most cities have identified public transit as a priority to reduce traffic congestion. These are all valuable and attractive assets and investments in any city. These investments will create jobs.
But on agrisilly all we get is complaining and bitching.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostSo you guys are opposed to walking and cycling now? What next to hate for the angry mob? LOL
Every major city has parks with walking and cycling paths. Saskatoon has the Meewasin trail system of over 90km along the beautiful river . Its well used and well loved.
Wascana Park one of the largest urban parks in North America covering nearly a 2400 acres has over 10km of bike and walking paths that are also well used and well loved.
Most of the 14.9 billion where this 400 million for walking and cycling trails comes from, will be spent over 8 years to improve public transit.
Why are you opposed to encouraging people to get some excercise?
Most cities have identified public transit as a priority to reduce traffic congestion. These are all valuable and attractive assets and investments in any city. These investments will create jobs.
But on agrisilly all we get is complaining and bitching.
Comment
-
Bike lanes, good public transit and less cars in the busy city centre make good sense. Pedestrians get in the way of cars, but nobody is suggesting getting rid of sidewalks and street crossings.
We have a big problem that people don't get enough exercise anymore. We are turning into a bunch of lazy slobs. There is a reason why there are so many fat assed Canadians and Americans that want drive through everything plus a 2000 calorie fast food fix in 30 seconds. Pass the donuts!Last edited by chuckChuck; Apr 10, 2021, 07:35.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sumdumguy View PostThe bikers like biking on the streets where people drive even when a beautiful bike path is a 1/2 block south. That’s sustainable?
Far as a I am concerned, all unlicensed and uninsured vehicles should be banned from public roads and paths including bikers who ignore all the road signs anyway. Designing a city around these people is plain stupid.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jazz View PostOr our astute urban planners put bikers doing 40kmh on walking paths where seniors and little kids walk.
Far as a I am concerned, all unlicensed and uninsured vehicles should be banned from public roads and paths including bikers who ignore all the road signs anyway. Designing a city around these people is plain stupid.
Comment
-
Guest
Originally posted by chuckChuck View PostNo designing a big city around only cars is stupid! Some of the best places to live are like villages within a city where you can walk or take public transit to everything you need. When you need a car call Uber or rent.
Tis the liberal way , no use owning a vehicle either
Own nothing and be happy
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment