Antarctic Ice

[chuckChuck]

A5, rabid deniers such as yourself shouldn't be lecturing about lack of scientific understanding! The "we are going to run out of CO2 idea" doesn't play well in public or amongst scientists. LOL

You can cling to slower ice loss in the antarctic to try to make your case that human caused climate change isn't happening, but nobody takes you seriously. Just another fringe conspiracy theorist.

[sumdumguy]

Everytime you put food in your mouth, gas in your car, turn on any appliance, drink a can of Coke, you can get on your knees and thank the good lord for CO2. You dingbats can thank the other side for depleting it. 👎

[jazz]

Its always best to put up one of these climate posts every few days to trap trolls like chuck.

He will literally spend weeks trying to find peer reviewed articles to support his delusion.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

You can cling to slower ice loss in the antarctic

I don't cling to that, since according to NASA, it isn't true.

NASA claims it is gaining ice.

Do you understand the differenc between slower loss, and gain?

I used short simple sentences to help you out.

[shtferbrains]

A5, rabid deniers such as yourself shouldn't be lecturing about lack of scientific understanding! The "we are going to run out of CO2 idea" doesn't play well in public or amongst scientists. LOL

You can cling to slower ice loss in the antarctic to try to make your case that human caused climate change isn't happening, but nobody takes you seriously. Just another fringe conspiracy theorist.

So when we slow C02 rise when do the glaciers stop melting?
Do the zelots expect that to happen at the new 2030 targets or the 2050 target?
Or do we have to wait for the C02 levels to drop in about 1000+ years as all those hockey stick charts you like to post show has supposedly happened in the past when levels wern't as high as you are predicting?
1000 yrs ago Mayan civilization was at it's peak.
Wonder is they will be obsessing over C02 1000 yrs from now?

[Guest]

arseholes are making money like gore and suzuki ,
nothing more , nothing less
and wingnuts do there bidding for free

[Stormin]

Just a thought... water expands about 9% when frozen. About 90% of an iceberg or ice shelf should be under water. Wouldn't that leave net zero rise in water if all the polar ice melted? Just asking.

[fjlip]

"NASA claims it is gaining ice.

Do you understand the difference between slower loss, and gain?

I used short simple sentences to help you out. " Better BOLD that, slow people can't absorb facts?

And again CC...



And all Climate Lies/BS/agenda as much as you TruAnons wish, it's NOT happening!

[furrowtickler]

A different perspective ...

https://youtu.be/ViY2J3LPgN4

[dmlfarmer]

Just a thought... water expands about 9% when frozen. About 90% of an iceberg or ice shelf should be under water. Wouldn't that leave net zero rise in water if all the polar ice melted? Just asking.

Much of the glaciation is not icebergs, but rather on top land masses or in the form of ice shelves above the water in which case 100% of that ice adds to sea level.

But an even bigger factor than the addition to melt water is thermal expansion of the oceans. Any temperature rise results in expansion of water and given the amount of water covering our planet it does not take much of a temperature rise to result in rising sea levels.