WOW....

[agstar77]

Way to go Larry, we had gone 5 whole days without a post from the troll, then you started a new covid thread and woke him up again.

Yes the conspiracy trolls are at it again you just could not let us quietly get vaxed and get out of the pandemic. If you have not anything positive don't post.

[biglentil]

The sheep are asleep.

[agstar77]

Like I said the conspiracy trolls are back.

[agstar77]

Another false naritive by bgl. No such speech. Where do you find this crap troll? Did you know you can check things with google? Why do you post this stuff? Some kind of sickness?

[J88]

Those who disagree or say something different are quietly silenced. The doctors who believe in science and follow the protocols but systematically think out what is really going on are pushed aside in the media because supposedly they are in the minority they don’t tow the line with the supposed majority. Of course we have covid which our people in the medical community see every day I don’t dispute that. I can’t fault those in leadership who surround themselves with like minded people. Just saying don’t be stuck on the narrative that seems to be pushed

[Casered]

Like I said the conspiracy trolls are back.

Nobody likes you here. Be best if you just left and never came back. I bet nobody likes you in real life either.

[checking]

I would have understood consistency like organics and opposition to use of chemical formulations, and conventional and a support for forb destruction products. But no, it all gets reversed on agri vile posts on the value of vaccines.

Here is an analogy you might understand. Farmers have a Group 2 resistant problem in their fields. Do they continue to use this ineffective product, or give up on it? Does the chemical company continue to insist their Group 2 chemical will control the resistant weeds, or develop a new Group? I would hope that the prudent chemical company would have a next gen ready made shelf product to take over from a widespread resistant problem weed, for both their clients and their own company's well being?

I think Pfizer is testing the market with a tweaked product that will handle the change in characteristics of new troublesome variants. The client isn't convinced the old product is ineffective, and needs to be given up on, yet. The prudent company needs more convincing data to make the sale.

[Casered]

I would have understood consistency like organics and opposition to use of chemical formulations, and conventional and a support for forb destruction products. But no, it all gets reversed on agri vile posts on the value of vaccines.

Here is an analogy you might understand. Farmers have a Group 2 resistant problem in their fields. Do they continue to use this ineffective product, or give up on it? Does the chemical company continue to insist their Group 2 chemical will control the resistant weeds, or develop a new Group? I would hope that the prudent chemical company would have a next gen ready made shelf product to take over from a widespread resistant problem weed, for both their clients and their own company's well being?

I think Pfizer is testing the market with a tweaked product that will handle the change in characteristics of new troublesome variants. The client isn't convinced the old product is ineffective, and needs to be given up on, yet. The prudent company needs more convincing data to make the sale.

My analogy is when a new untested and unknown canola variety comes out do you blindly trust basf and seed all your acres to it? Cause we are seeding the whole farm by vaxing the world.

[agstar77]

Party on trolls the truth will set you free. Just call someone out for a false post and the hyenas are out.

[J88]

It’s like saying hats off to those who listened to the truth and sold all their Canola last fall and especially now those experts who say we have a Bumper crop coming

[shtferbrains]

It’s like saying hats off to those who listened to the truth and sold all their Canola last fall and especially now those experts wbho say we have a Bumper crop coming

There is a large part of the explanation on why farmers and ranchers assess information for themselves.
Education is expensive.
If we took all expert advice unchallenged we might have even less neighbors.

[checking]

My analogy is when a new untested and unknown canola variety comes out do you blindly trust basf and seed all your acres to it? Cause we are seeding the whole farm by vaxing the world.

Is that the way it is done with canola varieties? Must be a bumper crop of dead plant bodies. Where is the vaccinated human equivalency?

Why not accept the fact that we may have got lucky beyond what could have been expected. Pity that the world didn't have it sitting on the shelf at day one.

Or understand the chance of a positive outcome was better than knowing if we waited on your advice there would be a larger mega cluster of negative outcomes. I, again, refer you to Maryland as an example of proof of those who once believed you.