Originally posted by jazz
View Post
There are many things; but in no particular order; and with option to extend the list:
Through innovative hard work; along with government supports (Trump at the forefront and many countries prepaying for doses that could have turned out worthless failures) it has created goldmines for the successful candidates (eg. Phizer, Modera and potential companies in the near and distant future which may further expand this newer technology.)
Some of those vaccines have specifically performed beyond expectations. Grant them that...
What was know from even before the phase3 trials was that little to no protection coming in the first week or so following especially the first injection. A certain portion of vaccine takers may well be exposed to infection; become scared into thinking about their own health (and maybe the benefits of the full Covid protection from two doses (in common world case)); but the first dose of vaccines is of next to no use if you are already exposed or even become exposed days later. SO HERE"S MY ANSWER TO THE FIRST OF MY DEEP LAMENTS...AND I ANTICIPATE JAZZ IS NOT WASTING MY VALUABLE TIME AND WILL RECIPROCATEIN A TTRUTHFUL WAY
Here's my suggestion for a missed potential game changing improvement that wasn't vigorously pursued; and still isn't well enough clarified. Why isn't and wasn't much more effort put into vigorously finding out if compounds such as ivermectin (etc. etc with anti viral safe known properties) given the same critical scutiny to determine its short term potential to bridge protection over until the vaccines could provide much longer term immunity. ie. the****udics
I can think of a dozen other additional comments to answer the jazz question. Including how those supporting governments could have negotiated patent foregiveness to allow the supply of vaccine to all manufacturers for an adequate period of time to potentially get the pandemic under control..or how protective equipment (masks; gowns and shields etc. should have been promoted vigorously once the critical dearth ofsupply for front line workers was assured. And how T***p could have had all the glory for his project; if only he could have brought himself to support it when he realized the vaccine couldn't get distributed before the Nov 4 election.
And on and on BUT BUT
Now its your turn to do what you asked of me. What one little thing do you regret that anti-vaxers (defined as those who would do anything including taking a bullet); before they would ever ever participate in a Pandemic vaccination program.
Comment