Being a northern producer with no practical means to ship south; neighbour did haul wheat to USA in the bad old days and after all the buy back bs and freight he was $1 better. Kinda a unique situation at the time where it had some ergot but protein off the chart. It’s only been 9 years since the thing’s been gone. We are still in transition and fumbling our way to a post cwb west. Like communism’s 70 year grip on Eastern Europe, you just don’t change overnight. Heck Russia’s still a mess while east Germany is a powerhouse. It’s a testament to proper transition and mindset of the people. That is where Ritz messed up. Could have foreseen problems with transparency.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Western Seducer reporter urges producers to question their devotion to conservatives
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
Originally posted by the big wheel View PostBahaha
You made rhe comment about saving and new farms. Since 2012
The exodus of farms has been massive has nothing
The main reasons are way more important than rhe
Cwb there or not no programs increased freight
If you don’t like wheat just don’t grow it lots of other crops
The main issue he destroyed rhe programs and were
Fuuked now sitting here wondering what to do with
A provincial dudd that doesn’t earn our vote either.
Ooooooh scarey ndp scarey liberals. Lmao
Not promoting it but do you understand with
A canola board last year we likely would have had
5 to 6 bucks????
Cwb was a minor factor in saving farms.
Comment
-
Getting rid of the CWB was all Closet Boy Harper's doing. Harpo had his sights on the CWB way back when he was president of the National Citizen Coalition.
Gerry Ritz Cracker just happened to be the Ag minister that followed the boss's instructions. Cracker was nothing more than the mouth piece.
Ask yourself how a failed ostrich farmer could manage anything other than fill his fat face at the public trough.
Gerry did nothing for Western Canadian farmers other than gut Ag programs, with very little to no opposition from Western Canadian farmers.
You guys can take down your Ritz Cracker posters from your bedroom walls.
Comment
-
Elevators and railways have been cooperating to reduce delivery points long before the end of the CWB, that is true, but does anybody have any empirical, non cherry-picked data that proves farmers are better off without the CWB? The extra basis over and above reasonable costs in all but 2 of the last 9 years would seem to be proof that we are not.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CptnObvious View PostElevators and railways have been cooperating to reduce delivery points long before the end of the CWB, that is true, but does anybody have any empirical, non cherry-picked data that proves farmers are better off without the CWB? The extra basis over and above reasonable costs in all but 2 of the last 9 years would seem to be proof that we are not.
Good riddance. Never look back.
Comment
-
EVERY year has been way better without the crooked bastards at the CWB skimming $$$ from sales of WESTERN Canadian farmers grain!!!!
Just being able to sell as much wheat or malt barley when the FARMER chooses to (or needs to for cash flow) is worth having the CWB gone!!!
Can sit on a couple years grain and when the price jumps can dump it all in a couple days with a phone call or two.
And get a cheque for the FULL amount in minutes to a week.
Now to get rid of the CBC and get some fair balanced reporting out of the other networks!!!
The western producer is down to about 4 pages of interesting unbiased information and I can NOT believe an editor let such pro Liberal drivel be published during an election in w Western Canadian farm paper!!
Do they truly have no idea that their readers/subscribers are 80% right wing CPC even though it seems they have 90% Commie left wing wacko's that dominate the letters to the editor!!!
Comment
-
-
Poll came out in the US saying only 58% believe mainstream media.
Way down from 2016 when it was like 90%
Even worse only 34% of Republicans as opposed to 78% of Democrats.
Those numbers will obviously get worse as they print what thier readers want to see.
So when that happens they only have potentially half the potential listeners???
CBC is a prime example.
I used to wake up every morning at 6am and turn on CBC news. It was the best news. Worth listening to.
When they went to the one hr nightly it started to go to hell. Once internet matured it wasnt worth turning on.
Got stuck listening in the truck yesterday morning and they had absolutely nothing. COVID numbers from the previous day and some SJW forest storey from Big River.
Played same shit every half hour. Can they expect to survive with less than half the audience interested in anything they have to say?
They have far outlasted thier mandate. Time for them to go.
Comment
-
One of rhe best questions ever written
We get absolutely fuuk all benefit
From a conservative government as
Farmers. Because we re too stupid to
Play the political game just a bunch of
Muted suckers played as fools stuck in the
Back pockets of these useless do nothing
Western MPs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by the big wheel View PostOne of rhe best questions ever written
We get absolutely fuuk all benefit
From a conservative government as
Farmers. Because we re too stupid to
Play the political game just a bunch of
Muted suckers played as fools stuck in the
Back pockets of these useless do nothing
Western MPs.
Every party will have its handful of buddies , every one else is left to fend for themselves.
Comment
-
Originally posted by furrowtickler View PostName one party anywhere in Canada that would benefit farmers ????.... answer is zero other than a handful of deep party leetch’s like Bill Boyd
Every party will have its handful of buddies , every one else is left to fend for themselves.
I am really amazed how quickly the checkoff funded organizations are on this file. Wasn't a resolution at the last AGM about this but they are on top of it. They have had a decade to get contracts changed to make a fair penalty for both sides. They are being reactive to the problem. No one is ever proactive in changing things. Worst part is everyone ends up paying for it.
The very guys that didn't want to pay for the CWB phuckups when the CWB got caught short , have a reference point as to what could happen, are probably the same group lobbying in the back rooms about contract shortages and losing grandpas farm because of it. And are expecting everyone to help them out of their shortage ...
Then don't forget the 500 donors to the sask party that are getting 4 billion wealth transfer.
Meanwhile 25000 ranchers and farmers are essentially ignored.Last edited by bucket; Sep 1, 2021, 07:08.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ry0972 View PostEVERY year has been way better without the crooked bastards at the CWB skimming $$$ from sales of WESTERN Canadian farmers grain!!!!
Just being able to sell as much wheat or malt barley when the FARMER chooses to (or needs to for cash flow) is worth having the CWB gone!!!
Can sit on a couple years grain and when the price jumps can dump it all in a couple days with a phone call or two.
And get a cheque for the FULL amount in minutes to a week.
Now to get rid of the CBC and get some fair balanced reporting out of the other networks!!!
The western producer is down to about 4 pages of interesting unbiased information and I can NOT believe an editor let such pro Liberal drivel be published during an election in w Western Canadian farm paper!!
Do they truly have no idea that their readers/subscribers are 80% right wing CPC even though it seems they have 90% Commie left wing wacko's that dominate the letters to the editor!!!
As for the quoted post: Nobody was skimming, the whole thing was audited, nobody got rich and there were no piles of leftover money. With the CWB you could book a cash sale for however much on whatever day you wanted( and many did - but less than 10% beat the pool price) or you could sit on uncontracted grain for as long as you wanted.
I ask again; is there any economic EVIDENCE( that a real, actual economist would accept) that farmers are better off BECAUSE we lost the CWB?
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment