• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Minister’s Order Septemer 13, 2021

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #25
    That exec order is way overkill for this virus. Sounds like they are prepping for some harsh measures this winter. Maybe like Australia going for covid zero and locking people into camps.

    Comment


      #26
      The leaked turd document is beginning to look alot less like a 'conspiracy theory' now that it is just a few weeks away from its birthday.


      "Projected COVID-19 mutation and/or co-infection with secondary virus (referred to as COVID-21) leading to a third wave with much higher mortality rate and higher rate of infection. Expected by February 2021.
      – Daily new cases of COVID-21 hospitalizations and COVID-19 and COVID-21 related deaths will exceed medical care facilities capacity. Expected Q1 – Q2 2021.
      – Enhanced lock down restrictions (referred to as Third Lock Down) will be implemented. Full travel restrictions will be imposed (including inter-province and inter-city). Expected Q2 2021.
      – Transitioning of individuals into the universal basic income program. Expected mid Q2 2021.
      – Projected supply chain break downs, inventory shortages, large economic instability. Expected late Q2 2021.
      – Deployment of military personnel into major metropolitan areas as well as all major roadways to establish travel checkpoints. Restrict travel and movement. Provide logistical support to the area. Expected by Q3 2021.

      Along with that provided road map the Strategic Planning committee was asked to design an effective way of transitioning Canadians to meet a unprecedented economic endeavor. One that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians. What we were told was that in order to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on a international scale, that the federal government was going to offer Canadians a total debt relief. This is how it works: the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc) which all funding will be provided
      to Canada by the IMF under what will become known as the World Debt Reset program. In exchange for acceptance of this total debt forgiveness the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever. The individual would also have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule, which would provide the individual with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living even under a full lock down (through the use of photo identification referred to as Canada’s HealthPass) .

      Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property and assets in that scenario and what would happen to lenders or financial institutions, we were simply told “the World Debt Reset program will handle all of the details”. Several committee members also questioned what would happen to individuals if they refused to participate in the World Debt Reset program, or the HealthPass, or the vaccination schedule, and the answer we got was very troubling. Essentially we were told it was our duty to make sure we came up with a plan to ensure that would never happen. We were told it was in the individuals best interest to participate. When several committee members pushed relentlessly to get an answer we were told that those who refused would first live under the lock down restrictions indefinitely. And that over a short period of time as more Canadians transitioned into the debt forgiveness program, the ones who refused to participate would be deemed a public safety risk and would be relocated into isolation facilities. Once in those facilities they would be given two options, participate in the debt forgiveness program and be released, or stay indefinitely in the isolation facility under the classification of a serious public health risk and have all their assets seized.

      So as you can imagine after hearing all of this it turned into quite the heated discussion and escalated beyond anything I’ve ever witnessed before. In the end it was implied by the PMO that the whole agenda will move forward no matter who agrees with it or not. That it wont just be Canada but in fact all nations will have similar roadmaps and agendas. That we need to take advantage of the situations before us to promote change on a grander scale for the betterment of everyone. The members who were opposed and ones who brought up key issues that would arise from such a thing were completely ignored. Our opinions and concerns were ignored. We were simply told to just do it.

      All I know is that I don’t like it and I think its going to place Canadians into a dark future."
      Last edited by biglentil; Sep 18, 2021, 16:20.

      Comment


        #27
        Originally posted by blueversi View Post
        I didn’t mention insurance companies I’m talking about tax payer funded health care. The kind where the Covid jab shamers are saying unvaccinated should pay for hospital costs should they be admitted.
        there is no one that has actual costs and risks penciled out as accurate as insurance companies do.a hospital stay whether being paid for by an insurance company or tax payer is irrelevant.The thing I say about unvaccinated going in for health care is if you do not trust the health system for a prevention how could you trust them for a treatment?

        Comment


          #28
          Originally posted by newguy View Post
          there is no one that has actual costs and risks penciled out as accurate as insurance companies do.a hospital stay whether being paid for by an insurance company or tax payer is irrelevant.The thing I say about unvaccinated going in for health care is if you do not trust the health system for a prevention how could you trust them for a treatment?
          I’d like to see an insurance company try ranching, those guys won’t last a generation.

          Comment


            #29
            Originally posted by burnt View Post
            If it's the doc that I just finished reading (September 17), it's another example of building policy of misinformation, garbage "science" and fear.

            Edicts developed by liars, scofflaws and megalomaniacs deserve to be burned publicly and their creators fastened in the stocks in the town square, pelted with tomatoes and rotten eggs for no less than two days and ridden out of town on a rail, tarred and feathered.

            I'm sure we all agree that the truth is worth preserving, right? Any other view would demonstrate terrible selfishness, of course.

            Or given the choice of public hanging. (Just so they have a choice, you know?)
            So much for the principle's of democracy...eh.

            Do you want to really own those words and ideas?

            Comment


              #30
              Originally posted by Taiga View Post
              I don’t think there is anything new there, the same order was filed March 2020, this is from the Sask Gov website:

              https://www.saskatchewan.ca/-/media/news-release-backgrounders/2020/mar/ministers-order.pdf

              Maybe I am missing something though.
              That wouldn't be the first or last time.

              Comment


                #31
                Gotta love the entertainment when the Drs argue on Agriville

                Comment


                  #32
                  Originally posted by biglentil View Post
                  Due to the Emergency they can do whatever they like.
                  That is exactly the initial disregard for Rule of law.

                  There is no reasonable cause for the Emergency declaration. The WHO had to change the definition of "pandemic" to make the current circumstances accommodate their purpose.

                  Comment


                    #33
                    Originally posted by oneoff View Post
                    So much for the principle's of democracy...eh.

                    Do you want to really own those words and ideas?
                    Hi there "oneoff" - now that you're here, would you please answer the question before you?

                    Or do you really want to own it that you're into violating women's bodies?

                    You're the one who needs to answer for the erosion of democratic rights since you are the one who provides imbecilic support for using force on people.

                    So just own it, little man.

                    Comment


                      #34
                      Originally posted by burnt View Post
                      Hi there "oneoff" - now that you're here, would you please answer the question before you?

                      Or do you really want to own it that you're into violating women's bodies?

                      You're the one who needs to answer for the erosion of democratic rights since you are the one who provides imbecilic support for using force on people.

                      So just own it, little man.
                      The more you argue with yourself...the the less sense you make.

                      Comment


                        #35
                        Originally posted by burnt View Post
                        If it's the doc that I just finished reading (September 17), it's another example of building policy of misinformation, garbage "science" and fear.

                        Edicts developed by liars, scofflaws and megalomaniacs deserve to be burned publicly and their creators fastened in the stocks in the town square, pelted with tomatoes and rotten eggs for no less than two days and ridden out of town on a rail, tarred and feathered.

                        I'm sure we all agree that the truth is worth preserving, right? Any other view would demonstrate terrible selfishness, of course.

                        Or given the choice of public hanging. (Just so they have a choice, you know?)
                        I see Burnt is frothing at the mouth more than usual.

                        Burnt must really hate Doug Ford's covid measures. But he has little to say about Ford.

                        As we have found out there are covidiots like Burnt who will go as far to bully and intimidate healthcare workers and patients with protests holding up access to emergency care in front of hospitals. All parties except the PPC have denounced the hospital protests. The PPC is in fact part of the protests in many cases.

                        Perhaps they don't know that hospitals don't make provincial policy? Not only are they stupid they are obnoxious and dangerous.

                        Comment


                          #36
                          Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post

                          As we have found out there are covidiots like Burnt who will go as far to bully and intimidate healthcare workers and patients with protests holding up access to emergency care in front of hospitals.
                          And yet you have no problem with the government's bullying and intimidation when it come to mandates and forcing the jab on healthcare workers

                          Comment

                          • Reply to this Thread
                          • Return to Topic List
                          Working...