• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Referendum

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #97
    Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
    And may I add, what a perfect example of noble cause corruption this post was.
    So even though you were caught lying you justify it, and continue to do the same thing without apology, because you think the cause is that important.
    This is the exact same thing that is going on in the global warming community. So you have had very adept role models to learn from. They justify any data fudging, outright lies, exaggerations and falsifications because they believe that their cause is so Noble.
    After perfecting it in climate change, we see it being used in the covid debates just as unabashedly As you just demonstrated for us.
    A5 the issue is ivermectin should not be used to treat or prevent covid. But you persist in denying it is an issue. WTF is wrong with you?

    Just more distraction instead of dealing with the real issue. You are siding with the rabid antivaxers and ivermectin pushers.

    From the FDA

    https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19

    Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19

    Here’s What You Need to Know about Ivermectin

    The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals. Ivermectin is approved for human use to treat infections caused by some parasitic worms and head lice and skin conditions like rosacea.
    Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. Clinical trials assessing ivermectin tablets for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in people are ongoing.
    Taking large doses of ivermectin is dangerous.
    If your health care provider writes you an ivermectin prescription, fill it through a legitimate source such as a pharmacy, and take it exactly as prescribed.
    Never use medications intended for animals on yourself or other people. Animal ivermectin products are very different from those approved for humans. Use of animal ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans is dangerous.
    Last edited by chuckChuck; Oct 24, 2021, 07:32.

    Comment


      #98
      Oct. 20th
      Health Canada reports increase in calls to poison control centres over ivermectin usage

      https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/health-canada-reports-increase-in-calls-to-poison-control-centres-over-ivermectin-usage-1.5631181

      TORONTO -- Health Canada is reminding Canadians that ivermectin should not be used to treat or prevent COVID-19, after poison control centres saw an increase in reports about the anti-parasitic drug over the summer months.

      In an update to a warning on its site, Health Canada said ivermectin has been authorized for human use as a prescription drug to treat parasitic worm infections. It has not been authorized for use against COVID-19.

      “There is no evidence that ivermectin works to prevent or treat COVID-19, and it is not authorized for this use,” Health Canada said.

      “Health Canada has not received any drug submission or applications for clinical trials for ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19.”

      It added that prescription drugs should only be taken under the advice and supervision of a health-care professional.

      Health Canada first issued a warning against taking ivermectin to treat COVID-19 in August after receiving reports that people were using veterinary ivermectin to treat and prevent COVID.

      Veterinary ivermectin is approved for use in animals to prevent certain heartworm diseases and other parasites, but it can be dangerous for humans, especially if taken in high doses, Health Canada said.

      Side effects of taking veterinary ivermectin can include vomiting, diarrhea, low blood pressure, allergic reactions, and death in serious cases, said Health Canada.

      “Canadians should never consume health products intended for animals because of potential serious health risks, including seizures, coma and even death.”

      Scientists have been warning against taking ivermectin for COVID-19 since as early as January 2021.

      Comment


        #99
        I see. So you are justified in lying about it then.
        Noble cause corruption.
        And just like how the supposed fact checkers in the media turn a blind eye to blatant fake news, our own self declared fact checker dml, also gives you a free pass.
        Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Oct 24, 2021, 08:12.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Hamloc View Post
          With a quick google I found that since 1964 Alberta has payed over $600 billion more to the federal government than we have received back in transfer payments!! Wow! Quebec has done considerably better!
          Why not ask Steven Harper and Jason Kenney to explain why Alberta has paid so much in federal taxes and not received an equal amount of federal transfers? They were in power long enough to bring it up and fix it if it was such a big problem.

          The simple explanation is Alberta is richer per capita and has more fiscal capacity than most other provinces for a long time primarily because of the luck of sitting on very large and lucrative oil reserves.

          Whether your numbers are accurate or not, the reality is Alberta has still had a big advantage over other provinces when it comes to paying for provincial programs. And Albert still receives some federal transfers.

          Most provinces would like to have Alberta's advantage of being too rich! Its such a big problem! LOL

          Comment


            Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
            Why not ask Steven Harper and Jason Kenney to explain why Alberta has paid so much in federal taxes and not received an equal amount of federal transfers? They were in power long enough to bring it up and fix it if it was such a big problem.

            The simple explanation is Alberta is richer per capita and has more fiscal capacity than most other provinces for a long time primarily because of the luck of sitting on very large and lucrative oil reserves.

            Whether your numbers are accurate or not, the reality is Alberta has still had a big advantage over other provinces when it comes to paying for provincial programs. And Albert still receives some federal transfers.

            Most provinces would like to have Alberta's advantage of being too rich! Its such a big problem! LOL
            Spoken like a true jealous socialist
            The underground economy in Quebec , what do you think of that ?
            I worked there saw it first hand
            Daycare, post secondary education all subsidized
            I bet quebecers are better off than most provinces

            Comment


              Originally posted by caseih View Post
              Spoken like a true jealous socialist
              The underground economy in Quebec , what do you think of that ?
              I worked there saw it first hand
              Daycare, post secondary education all subsidized
              I bet quebecers are better off than most provinces
              So Only Quebec has an underground economy? LOL

              Guys in the oil patch I know, talk about the cronyism and corruption in the oil patch. Remember Bill Boyd and the GTH land deal?

              Since when is subsidized education and daycare a problem? Your kids went to public school didn't they? Or you would have preferred to pay for private school?

              So if these are priorities for Quebec that s there choice is it not?
              Last edited by chuckChuck; Oct 24, 2021, 08:43.

              Comment


                oh sorry , read the post , YDF
                DAY CARE, UNIVERSITY , we paid ourselves, and paid lots

                Comment


                  When was the last time Saskatchewan was a have not province ? I forget who was politically in charge of the province at that time

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by jwab
                    Exactly, how many of them have a Florida home compared to the rest of Canadians? There’s a community of them down there, on who’s dime?
                    And you don't know any Albertans or Saskys who have a place in Arizona, California or Florida or in BC? Who pays for their second homes or winter vacations?

                    Lets ask SF3 who paid for his second home in Florida? LOL

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by furrowtickler View Post
                      When was the last time Saskatchewan was a have not province ? I forget who was politically in charge of the province at that time
                      Wasn't it Grant Devine?

                      Times were tough with all the droughts, bad crops, low prices, high interest rates in the 1980s when Grant just about the bankrupted the province and 1/2 the caucus was charged and convicted of expense account fraud.

                      Those were the good ol days!

                      The money from those "eastern bastards" kept many a farm afloat. LOL
                      Last edited by chuckChuck; Oct 24, 2021, 10:45.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                        Wasn't it Grant Devine?

                        Times were tough with all the droughts, bad crops, low prices, high interest rates in the 1980s when Grant just about the bankrupted the province and 1/2 the caucus was charged and convicted of expense account fraud.

                        Those were the days!

                        The money from those "eastern bastards" kept many a farm afloat. LOL
                        Oh hold on there chucky cheese it the money stole from western farmers via the wcb they would owe us a hell of a lot more! “Lol”

                        Comment


                          Sask was last a have not province during the Calvert Romanow years - late 90s to early 2000s. When the entire world economy was going gangbusters, we got our little pathetic welfare cheque from the feds and were supposed to be happy.

                          Now the Sask economy is so resilient it can take an oil shock, a potash shock, an ag shock and a covid shock in the same year and still not trigger the formula for payout.

                          Meanwhile, look whos crying again.

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	que2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	54.8 KB
ID:	771873
                          Last edited by jazz; Oct 24, 2021, 10:22.

                          Comment

                          • Reply to this Thread
                          • Return to Topic List
                          Working...