CPR is suing Sask for a third of billion. They claim they have paid taxes they should not have. Must almost going bankrupt.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
CPR Feel The Love
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
-
Originally posted by Robertbarlage View PostAnd who owns cpr again? They just can't make enough money fast enough the bastards!
Don't tangle with railway lawyers... they are ruthless and well connected....I have felt the 'Love' personally.
Cheers
Comment
-
The right thing to do would be to re-nationalize the railways , settle all the pending " so called contracts" and start over.
They completely phucked up in 2013 , wouldn't pay a dime in penalties and the government ignored the harm to farmers much the same as today....and now this 380 million dollar claim.
Comment
-
The land should have reverted to the crown in return for rail rates. Unfortunately there was no one willing to fight the railways. The railbeds should be run by a crown corporation which would allocate running rights to all rail companies. May the most efficient survive.
Comment
-
Oxymoron
Crown Corporations. Most efficient.
Railways were set up to milk the taxpayer.
Always did. Always will.
Sleepy R has generations of experience.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shtferbrains View PostOxymoron
Crown Corporations. Most efficient.
Railways were set up to milk the taxpayer.
Always did. Always will.
Sleepy R has generations of experience.
Comment
-
-
It is so frustrating, just honour contracts. If they aren’t supposed to be paying taxes then they shouldn’t have to pay taxes, if they agree to a 15% freight reduction IN PERPETUITY they should have to provide a 15% freight reduction in perpetuity. If it makes them go broke or the tax break hurts the government more then they thought too bad.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Grahamp View PostIt is so frustrating, just honour contracts. If they aren’t supposed to be paying taxes then they shouldn’t have to pay taxes, if they agree to a 15% freight reduction IN PERPETUITY they should have to provide a 15% freight reduction in perpetuity. If it makes them go broke or the tax break hurts the government more then they thought too bad.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Grahamp;516870]It is so frustrating, just honour contracts.
We are light years ahead in railroading in Canada than where we were at 20 years ago, some of the most efficient service anywhere on the planet.
I for one am glad that CDN railways have kept us up and running through Covid, and done it efficiently.
Credit where credit is due, Hunter Harrison was a grumpy greasy stingy RR manager, he did bring about massive efficiency gains in railroading in North America. We can be thankful that Quebec and PM JT are not in charge of our RR in Canada!!!
Cheers
Comment
-
Originally posted by Grahamp View PostIt is so frustrating, just honour contracts. If they aren’t supposed to be paying taxes then they shouldn’t have to pay taxes, if they agree to a 15% freight reduction IN PERPETUITY they should have to provide a 15% freight reduction in perpetuity. If it makes them go broke or the tax break hurts the government more then they thought too bad.
… risky statement to say around these parts this year!
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment